Maddow Uses Obama-Era Photos to Slam Trump Border Policy

[BaghdadBob]

Norah O'donnell, you're fired.

She's too hawt to fire. She sure is low energy, tho.

[BaghdadBob]

It was available at the time by a simple image search. Then Google started to weed out anything that could be used against Democrats. Try to find it today.

Oh, yeah! There used to be a ton of pix of slick willy with Epstein. The google started to de-index them. If you find one today it's by accident.

[BaghdadBob]

FYI - madcow was being sued & her pleading was that nothing she says on air should be construed as truthful. That's a hell of an admission. face-icon-small-shocked.gif

[TheLiquidGuy]

FYI - madcow was being sued & her pleading was that nothing she says on air should be construed as truthful. That's a hell of an admission. Attachment 31159

No one should construe your comment here as truthful until you provide a link to the exact phrase.


Oh and sorry but, Rachel Maddow won the lawsuit.

Rachel Maddow Wins Dismissal of OAN Defamation Lawsuit

https://variety.com/2020/biz/news/rachel-maddow-oan-defamation-dismissed-1234614682/

[DGUtley]

If you call this stuff fake news it’s only because you are desperate to find something worthy of that title.

Were Kids in cages Fake news because they used the wrong pic??? There are plenty of pics of that. You dont think Maddow’s people could have found some? Seriously? Like i say, you guys are desperate.

Latinos supporting Bidden is fake news? The polls say otherwise and you know it. Again, you guys are desperate.

Tax returns? You are in no position to call maddow a liar when you do not know the culture of the show. It was partly tongue in cheek, and 100% factually correct by the way. I knew it was just a tease.


You are struggling to Cope with the reality of reporting on Trumpism, so you are in this permanent stage of denial. Its all lies! Thats your only way to escape painful cognitive dissonance.
Call it all fake. Call it a lie.

Desperate.

yeah ok.gif

[BaghdadBob]

No one should construe your comment here as truthful until you provide a link to the exact phrase.


Oh and sorry but, Rachel Maddow won the lawsuit.

Rachel Maddow Wins Dismissal of OAN Defamation Lawsuit

https://variety.com/2020/biz/news/ra...ed-1234614682/

So, to contradict me you fail to quote her argument? icon_lmao.gif There's not a single word quoted from him/her/it in the article you linked.

He / she / it won because the judge agreed his /her /its comments should never be taken by normal people as truth, but the judge failed to take into account that normal people would never watch his / her / its crap. So, there's that ...


In response to him / her / it claiming that OAN was "literally paid Russian propaganda," he/she/it argued ...

“…the liberal host was clearly offering up her ‘own unique expression’ of her views to capture what she saw as the ‘ridiculous’ nature of the undisputed facts. Her comment, therefore, is a quintessential statement ‘of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false.”

[TheLiquidGuy]

So, to contradict me you fail to quote her argument? Attachment 31166 There's not a single word quoted from him/her/it in the article you linked.

Are you joking??? Of course I didn't provide the non-existent quote. *You* are the one who lied about what she said, not me. Therefore, YOU are the one who has to find the quote. That's just how debate works. Let me know when you can substantiate your false claim that "her pleading was that nothing she says on air should be construed as truthful."
BaghdadBob, you lied. No one should construe anything you say as truthful until you can provide that quote. Good luck restoring your credibility.


WARNING: the following is another blatant BagdadBob lie:

he/she/it won because the judge agreed his/her/its comments should never be taken by normal people as truth,

No one should ever believe anything Bagdadbob says in the future.

but the judge failed to take into account that normal people would never watch her crap. So, there's that ...

In response to her claiming that OAN was "literally paid Russian propaganda," he/she/it argued ...

“…the liberal host was clearly offering up her ‘own unique expression’ of her views to capture what she saw as the ‘ridiculous’ nature of the undisputed facts. Her comment, therefore, is a quintessential statement ‘of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false.”

Nowhere in that quote does it imply that Rachel Maddow lied. The only one lying here is you.

I am starting a lie log for you.
I keep track of people who lie in order to win arguments. I encourage everyone to keep a log of my "lies" we need to keep each other honest in this forum. If we dont, then people will try to do what you tried just now. Smear a highly respected Rhodes scholar and investigative journalist.



Rachel Maddow won the lawsuit, because it was a frivolous suit.

[TheLiquidGuy]

Attachment 31160

That's a compelling point you make.

[Tahuyaman]

What kind of idiot takes Rachel Maddow seriously? No one answer that. I already know.

[The Booman]

Maddow is one of those people who has absolutely no self respect whatsoever and is willing embarrass herself to the nth degree in order to hurt republicans. Both sides sadly have these types of awful people. the left however have cornered the market of pathetic.