President Donald Trump declines to commit to peaceful transfer of power:

[Captain Krunch]

Sooo... Your assertion is that half the people who support tRump are embarrassed to admit it?

Got any evidence?

No genius.

See the part where I said we don't want us or our families to be bullied, harassed, and assaulted by you commies and your hate and violence.

Lest we have to bust yall's ass.

Which we will do when pushed to far.

Evidence, is all around you, and will be on your TV this Nov.

Get your tissues and trans LGBTQXYZ blankey ready.

BTW: Ruth Ginsburg died, President Trump will fill her seat, have a great day!

[Crepitus]

That is PHOTOGRAPHIC evidence of what happens to a Trump supporter around Nazis.

Seig Heil, brownshirt.

Ah, so did you misunderstand the question or did you just decide to deflect?

[Crepitus]

No genius.

See the part where I said we don't want us or our families to be bullied, harassed, and assaulted by you commies and your hate and violence.

Lest we have to bust yall's ass.

Which we will do when pushed to far.

Evidence, is all around you, and will be on your TV this Nov.

Get your tissues and trans LGBTQXYZ blankey ready.

BTW: Ruth Ginsburg died, President Trump will fill her seat, have a great day!

So that's a "no"?

Cool.

[pjohns]

I do think that President Trump handled this question rather clumsily: A far better answer would have been that yes, of course, he would abide by all precedent and constitutional requirements in this regard--and then just let the matter drop.

But I really cannot imagine that he would attempt to cling to power, if he were to lose, like some Third World dictator might.

Presumably, he was considering the possibility that there may be widespread "ballot harvesting" in 2020--which would, of course, throw the election results into disarray.

[invictus]

Trump is definitely undermining the election results before they happen. He's trailing in polls, he knows this. He has yet to explain how mail in ballots would be used in a fraud but somehow the fraud will take place? Or maybe he took a look at the polls and realized that half of democrat voters are planning to vote by mail while only 1 in 4 of republicans plan to vote by mail. In other words, it's to Trumps advantage that mail voting is undermined somehow. He did the same thing back in 2016 when the polls said he's lose and he went on to claim fraud before anything happened. Then ofcourse there was a shift and him and Hillary were neck and neck in the polls and he wound up winning while still claiming there was widespread fraud. Which there wasn't. I don't know the reason he does this but not too worried about it as I think the system is good enough to push him out if he loses.

As far as this election goes, democrats, don't celebrate too early. While Trump is behind on the polls, those same polls say that it's close in battleground states, like Florida. So, there's a real chance he wins the electorate while losing the popular vote. A repeat of 2016 is very possible.

[Peter1469]

He does that a lot.

I do think that President Trump handled this question rather clumsily: A far better answer would have been that yes, of course, he would abide by all precedent and constitutional requirements in this regard--and then just let the matter drop.

But I really cannot imagine that he would attempt to cling to power, if he were to lose, like some Third World dictator might.

Presumably, he was considering the possibility that there may be widespread "ballot harvesting" in 2020--which would, of course, throw the election results into disarray.

[Peter1469]

The Prog Transition Integrity Project is planning a color revolution in the United States should Trump win. A color revolution like those the US orchestrated in other nations such as Ukraine. That is sedition, not merely undermining the election results.

Trump is definitely undermining the election results before they happen. He's trailing in polls, he knows this. He has yet to explain how mail in ballots would be used in a fraud but somehow the fraud will take place? Or maybe he took a look at the polls and realized that half of democrat voters are planning to vote by mail while only 1 in 4 of republicans plan to vote by mail. In other words, it's to Trumps advantage that mail voting is undermined somehow. He did the same thing back in 2016 when the polls said he's lose and he went on to claim fraud before anything happened. Then ofcourse there was a shift and him and Hillary were neck and neck in the polls and he wound up winning while still claiming there was widespread fraud. Which there wasn't. I don't know the reason he does this but not too worried about it as I think the system is good enough to push him out if he loses.

As far as this election goes, democrats, don't celebrate too early. While Trump is behind on the polls, those same polls say that it's close in battleground states, like Florida. So, there's a real chance he wins the electorate while losing the popular vote. A repeat of 2016 is very possible.

[stjames1_53]

I do think that President Trump handled this question rather clumsily: A far better answer would have been that yes, of course, he would abide by all precedent and constitutional requirements in this regard--and then just let the matter drop.

But I really cannot imagine that he would attempt to cling to power, if he were to lose, like some Third World dictator might.

Presumably, he was considering the possibility that there may be widespread "ballot harvesting" in 2020--which would, of course, throw the election results into disarray.

That is the plan of the democrats to throw the election.

[stjames1_53]

Trump is definitely undermining the election results before they happen. He's trailing in polls, he knows this. He has yet to explain how mail in ballots would be used in a fraud but somehow the fraud will take place? Or maybe he took a look at the polls and realized that half of democrat voters are planning to vote by mail while only 1 in 4 of republicans plan to vote by mail. In other words, it's to Trumps advantage that mail voting is undermined somehow. He did the same thing back in 2016 when the polls said he's lose and he went on to claim fraud before anything happened. Then ofcourse there was a shift and him and Hillary were neck and neck in the polls and he wound up winning while still claiming there was widespread fraud. Which there wasn't. I don't know the reason he does this but not too worried about it as I think the system is good enough to push him out if he loses.

As far as this election goes, democrats, don't celebrate too early. While Trump is behind on the polls, those same polls say that it's close in battleground states, like Florida. So, there's a real chance he wins the electorate while losing the popular vote. A repeat of 2016 is very possible.

the popular vote doesn't mean squat.

[invictus]

The Prog Transition Integrity Project is planning a color revolution in the United States should Trump win. A color revolution like those the US orchestrated in other nations such as Ukraine. That is sedition, not merely undermining the election results.

Oh dear lord, are you Russian by any chance? Russia orchestrated a revolution in Ukraine, really?