Then call them out when you see it, jet! Agree with me that this forum needs to know its' limitations and history nor historical perspective are one of its' skills. In fact, as a group, it's f'n deplorable. No one has been a slave....or even known anyone who has owned a slave(cept for Kamala Harris' family). No one disputes that, my point is no one has ever seen a slave owner, or a Nazi...and wouldn't know one if one drove up their ass.....in an RV...and did a u-turn to get out.
And while we might know there were slaves in this country.........few....and a mean very few jet57....know how slavery came to an end in this country. Nor how many sacrificed indeed to end slavery. What of Irish-Americans in the United States, for example? I think the Irish and Irish Brigades who were mowed down at Antietam.....have they earned their Black Lives Matter merit badges...as an example. What more sacrifice would you ask of them.
You read of some of their exploits. Read the history of so many who gave their lives up to rid the planet of Nazis or Imperial Japan who wreaked their own holocaust on the Chinese.
No one disputes there was slavery, jet. Who disputes how it all came to an end. What it took to to bring slavery to an end. I'll assert many more whites than blacks took Black Lives Matter as a policy in the 1860's, do their ancestors get a pass. Does America even know it's ancestry?
Given many of their family's trees these days.....are f'n sticks?
Then call it out....both ways, Rip. You see someone making an idiotic Hitler analogy, point that out. See someone claiming today's police are Gestapo.....call em out. See someone like the Speaker of the House calling the President an enemy of the state, intervene. Don't just sit there.
Ransome, I thank you for making an earnest effort. What you are now on to is really more of historical knowledge, good or bad, and moving away from the subject you've introduced. All of things you mention are very very well documented and written about by experts and are undisputed. I think that what you're trying to get at here is the flaming effect that such labels have. I just posted a response to chris that includes probably thee worst flamer on this board in action once again.
The other issue about these labels DOES come from discussions of politics and the sources from where such "political opinion" derives. hat too is a source of contention that I commented on earlier. Only because said histories are - applied or - misapplied in order to give one's opinion an authoritative appeal. Left-wing nuts and right-wing nuts are cut from the very same combative cloth and I "physically ignore" nine or ten of them right now. THAT is a great solution to cutting them out of the discussions; if that's your goal.