User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 51

Thread: The new intolerance

  1. #1
    Points: 665,213, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433307
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    197,542
    Points
    665,213
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    31,981
    Thanked 80,896x in 54,714 Posts
    Mentioned
    2011 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    The new intolerance

    The new intolerance is another expose of Critical Theory, parent of Critical Race Theory.

    After half an hour I’d had enough of this book. Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay seemed obsessed by a straw man, a fake foe. Their opponents, I felt, were surely well-intentioned and did not really believe what they were accused of believing. I read on and now think differently. The authors describe a totalitarian cult that is hostile to the rule of reason and that has infiltrated academic and cultural institutions across Britain and the US. Its adherents seek to persecute those who disagree with them, censor academic discourse and promote manifest falsities to the point that silence is a treason against liberal values. The straw man had turned concrete.

    The thesis is broadly familiar. Something called Critical Theory and latterly Social Justice Theory (both demanding the dignity of capital letters) has burst out of academia since the turn of the century, initially in the US. It holds that truth in all forms is subjective, a function of power exerted by the privileged over the victimized. This power envelops not just the “marginalized” but everyday language, law, science, medicine and academic research. All these intellectual realms are mere creations of “an entrenched patriarchal ascendancy”. Only identities and emotions may be treated as “reified” or real.

    Pluckrose and Lindsay trace the rise of this “Theory” to postmodernist philosophy in the 1960s and 70s. They delve into Gramsci, Derrida and Foucault and the “deconstruction” of the biases embedded in European language. I recall being drawn to deconstruction as an analysis of a then illiberal state and was ready to respect the concept. Since then waves of liberalization, at least in western democracies, have seen a transformation of policy and practice on race, gender and homosexuality, to such an extent that Theory had to find new rationales for its radicalism. The authors suggest that “since the most significant legal battles had been won, all that remained to tackle were sexist, racist and homophobic attitudes and discourses”. Every time the liberals shot another of their foxes, radical Theorists had to shift their target from “material advances within social structures” to ever more obscurantist grievances.

    ...

    What is refreshing about this book is its conclusion. The authors have no counter-revolutionary strategy. They make no demand that Theory be suppressed. They plead simply that those who hold the central tenets of western liberalism stand up for them, for reason, debate, tolerance, democracy and the rule of law. What is shocking is that making such a plea in this day and age should require the authors to conceal where they live and work. I am sure this moment will pass, but I sense we are glimpsing one of those sidetracks in Western ideology that led to both Salem and Weimar.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    HawkTheSlayer (10-09-2020),pjohns (10-09-2020),RMNIXON (10-09-2020),stjames1_53 (10-09-2020)

  3. #2
    Points: 25,022, Level: 38
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 628
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    CCitizen's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1253
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,581
    Points
    25,022
    Level
    38
    Thanks Given
    2,963
    Thanked 1,244x in 949 Posts
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sadly the New Left is extremely Totalitarian.

    I belong to Old Left. In 1960s, Liberals fought for Free Speech and burned their draft cards.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CCitizen For This Useful Post:

    RMNIXON (10-09-2020),Sunsettommy (10-10-2020)

  5. #3
    Points: 62,451, Level: 61
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 1,999
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger First ClassVeteranRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive50000 Experience Points
    Calypso Jones's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    26181
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
    Posts
    14,239
    Points
    62,451
    Level
    61
    Thanks Given
    5,075
    Thanked 10,860x in 6,374 Posts
    Mentioned
    109 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Even then the left had been taken hostage WILLINGLY, by the Communist party....and they were too stupid to get it.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Calypso Jones For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (10-09-2020)

  7. #4
    Points: 79,997, Level: 68
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 53
    Overall activity: 0.3%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    nathanbforrest45's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    77960
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    In a house on a hill
    Posts
    28,260
    Points
    79,997
    Level
    68
    Thanks Given
    7,102
    Thanked 16,261x in 10,568 Posts
    Mentioned
    129 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CCitizen View Post
    Sadly the New Left is extremely Totalitarian.

    I belong to Old Left. In 1960s, Liberals fought for Free Speech and burned their draft cards.
    They still shouted down or blew up anyone who didn't agree with them. As for burning their draft cards (very few actually did) they did so because they supported the totalitarian North Vietnamese regime (along with Chairman Mao and Fidel Castro)

  8. #5
    Points: 114,156, Level: 82
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 2,494
    Overall activity: 62.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    RMNIXON's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    30546
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    30,790
    Points
    114,156
    Level
    82
    Thanks Given
    31,824
    Thanked 30,540x in 17,981 Posts
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Social Justice is a way to undermine our legal traditions of Equal Protection and Individual Rights. That the person is ultimately responsible for their behavior in any circumstance.

    In exchange the Justice System will be constantly tilted toward Group Rights depending on whatever favored categories you can count yourself a part of: Race of course, gender including the gender confused, Poverty and income, drug abuse, ect.....

    It might even go so far that one day having a criminal record will be in your favor. The "No Bail" trend is already pushing that direction. People with long criminal records and a high chance of committing other crimes in the near future are on equal footing as a first offender.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RMNIXON For This Useful Post:

    CCitizen (10-09-2020),MisterVeritis (10-09-2020)

  10. #6
    Points: 114,156, Level: 82
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 2,494
    Overall activity: 62.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    RMNIXON's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    30546
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    30,790
    Points
    114,156
    Level
    82
    Thanks Given
    31,824
    Thanked 30,540x in 17,981 Posts
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CCitizen View Post
    Sadly the New Left is extremely Totalitarian.

    I belong to Old Left. In 1960s, Liberals fought for Free Speech and burned their draft cards.



    A Left that once stood up for Civil Liberties. That protested NSA mass surveillance and I agreed.

    Now they look the other way with FISA Court and FBI abuse. That is a different left indeed!

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to RMNIXON For This Useful Post:

    CCitizen (10-09-2020)

  12. #7
    Points: 25,022, Level: 38
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 628
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    CCitizen's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1253
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,581
    Points
    25,022
    Level
    38
    Thanks Given
    2,963
    Thanked 1,244x in 949 Posts
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RMNIXON View Post
    A Left that once stood up for Civil Liberties.
    Now the Old Left is rare and far between, but it still exists.

  13. #8
    Points: 25,022, Level: 38
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 628
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    CCitizen's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1253
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,581
    Points
    25,022
    Level
    38
    Thanks Given
    2,963
    Thanked 1,244x in 949 Posts
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
    As for burning their draft cards (very few actually did) they did so because they supported the totalitarian North Vietnamese regime (along with Chairman Mao and Fidel Castro)
    They opposed Draft -- a form of Temporal Slavery.

    They also opposed US disregard for civilian lives in Southeast Asia.

  14. #9
    Points: 25,022, Level: 38
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 628
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    CCitizen's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1253
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,581
    Points
    25,022
    Level
    38
    Thanks Given
    2,963
    Thanked 1,244x in 949 Posts
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RMNIXON View Post
    Social Justice is a way to undermine our legal traditions of Equal Protection and Individual Rights. That the person is ultimately responsible for their behavior in any circumstance.
    Definitely. They find some forms of bigotry, bias, Discrimination, and abuse acceptable.

  15. #10
    Points: 25,022, Level: 38
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 628
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    CCitizen's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1253
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    4,581
    Points
    25,022
    Level
    38
    Thanks Given
    2,963
    Thanked 1,244x in 949 Posts
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Where are you Old Left?



    Last edited by CCitizen; 10-09-2020 at 04:02 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts