Members banned from this thread: Peter1469 |
Captain Krunch (10-27-2020),montana (10-17-2020)
Captain Krunch (10-27-2020),HawkTheSlayer (10-17-2020),montana (10-17-2020),Sunsettommy (10-17-2020)
Abby08 (10-17-2020),Captain Krunch (10-27-2020),CaveDog (10-27-2020)
Captain Krunch (10-27-2020),HawkTheSlayer (10-17-2020),montana (10-17-2020),Tahuyaman (10-26-2020)
Captain Krunch (10-27-2020),Tahuyaman (10-17-2020)
Yeah, I found a couple of articles in regards to loosening regulations on later stage pregnancies but nothing to the nonsense you're talking about. I'm from NY, no such nonsense either. Nothing post-birth, that's for sure. That wouldn't even be an abortion. Might want to rethink your sources of information.
No. I don't see anyone saying "kill the baby after birth"
I hear the gov saying "resuscitate" the baby if the mother chooses. No one is smothering a conscious living baby.
I think the rest of the clip is missing where the gov then says "there would then be a conversation" presumably to discuss whether they would want to have a "Do Not Resuscitate" order for the child. Again, not killing the baby.
So no. this is not an example of state-condoned infanticide.
“Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
--Donald Trump
Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.
Captain Krunch (10-27-2020),HawkTheSlayer (10-17-2020),montana (10-18-2020),Perianne (10-17-2020)
Captain Krunch (10-27-2020)
Captain Krunch (10-27-2020)