Fake news from the conservative side.

[The Booman]

Why did the cops show up?

[Retirednsmilin308]

doesn't alter the fact that she's freakin' out crazy doing what she's doing. Now it doesn't APPEAR that she hit the car in front? but she was definitely driving without hands on wheel, looking at road, all in car. Why did the cops show up?

I would imagine the cops were in the area because of the rally.

I am only making one point. NO...She DID NOT hit anyone.

Now, who has 360 degree clear vision and can see this very real fact too.

No embellishments.

She DID NOT hit anyone...YES...or....NO.

My clear vision says no....and therefore the guy who made this video is pushing fake news and lieing.

[Retirednsmilin308]

The car in front pulled ahead. Minor bumps don’t produce much of anything.

There was no bump. Not even a minor one. You do not have clear vision. it is tainted by a political lens.

Look at all the room between the two. She hit the brakes early enough to NOT hit the guy.

This one point, and this one point only, is what I am saying.

This one point separates those with common sense and clear vision from those that have a tainted lens due to politics.

[Retirednsmilin308]

clearly Mz CrazyRage registered hitting the car.

No she did not. Clear vision and common sense says so.

[Retirednsmilin308]

True but who is Michael Knowles?

I have no idea who the guy is, but if he pushes fake and biased news like this, I am better off not knowing.

I only saw the video when it popped up this morning when I turned on the TV.

As soon as I saw how much of a liar he was, I had to share it and see how many here also can see with their eyes instead of their political bias.

YES, she is a complete nut to be triggered by others free speech that differs from hers enough to hang half her body out the window while she is supposed to be driving.
A completely hazardous situation from the get-go.

But NO, she did not hit the vehicle in front of her. She did not even bump it. There was a lot of space between them both.

It is always best to see things as the really are.

[Retirednsmilin308]

Please tell me you are joking here. The reporting of what this woman did was not an example of fake news.

OK...how about a lie. A lie perpetuated on a a You Tube video.

I call it fake news. You call it whatever you like.
I am here to show the lie and nothing else.

NO, she did not hit the vehicle.

[Tahuyaman]

OK...how about a lie. A lie perpetuated on a a You Tube video.

I call it fake news. You call it whatever you like.
I am here to show the lie and nothing else.

NO, she did not hit the vehicle.

It sure looks like she did. Besides no one claimed that it was a major accident involving significant damage, injuries or debris spread on the street. She was being ridiculed for her idiotic actions which were not faked.

If you wanted to find a right wing version of fake news, you failed miserably on that one.



You must have overindulged in sangria in your nan cave when you came up with that.

[Retirednsmilin308]

Yeah cause that's exactly the same as NETWORK NEWS scaring people in July by harping about "record numbers of new cases each day" while covering up the fact that they were testing 3,4 5 times the number of people that they were when those records were set. Or running OP-ED hit pieces while the TV says "NEWS"
That is the kind of thing we are talking about. It does not make what whomever this guy is right but there is a certain matter of degree and frequency here.

Yep, it seems everyone wants to get into the act.

EXAMPLE: I took the wife out to Chili's today for dinner. Afterward we shared a chocolate overload cake.
I let her have the last few bites.
A liar with a video camera could have shot her having those last few bites and said she ate the whole thing.

Notice in the vieo I posted they DID NOT show the front of her car hitting the other one. They did not because it never happened.
She slammed on the brakes giving the appearance of a collision, but when you see all the distance between them, anyone with clear vision and common sense can see she did not hit them at all.

Yet the liar says she did, but also notice the other driver never got out of their vehicle either.
She also had a passenger that probably warned her before she hit it and that is why she did not.

I have no doubt if she did not have that passenger in the front seat, she would have plowed right into the other guy.
She is acting completely distracted and deranged.
Good for her, she had someone watching the road for her.

No bump, no collision.

...and not truth to the story.

[Chris]

I have no idea who the guy is, but if he pushes fake and biased news like this, I am better off not knowing.

I only saw the video when it popped up this morning when I turned on the TV.

As soon as I saw how much of a liar he was, I had to share it and see how many here also can see with their eyes instead of their political bias.

YES, she is a complete nut to be triggered by others free speech that differs from hers enough to hang half her body out the window while she is supposed to be driving.
A completely hazardous situation from the get-go.

But NO, she did not hit the vehicle in front of her. She did not even bump it. There was a lot of space between them both.

It is always best to see things as the really are.

Agree. She slammed on the brakes a foot from the car in front of her.

Think I've come across his video before but nothing impressive.

[Retirednsmilin308]

It sure looks like she did. Besides no one claimed that it was a major accident involving significant damage, injuries or debris spread on the street. She was being ridiculed for her idiotic actions.

If you wanted to find a right wing version of fake news, you failed miserably on that one.



You must have overindulged in sangria in your nan cave when you came up with that.

Naw, I saw waiting for my grits & sausage to finish steeping.
I posted it before 6 this morning.