User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 16 of 16 FirstFirst ... 61213141516
Results 151 to 152 of 152

Thread: Rules for appointing Supreme Court Justices?

  1. #151
    Points: 139,043, Level: 89
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 407
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    stjames1_53's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    58445
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    50,860
    Points
    139,043
    Level
    89
    Thanks Given
    105,014
    Thanked 29,466x in 20,422 Posts
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by invictus View Post
    Yeah, we've been over this. If it was 'designed to fail' the Republicans wouldn't try to undermine it's every aspect and let the damn thing implode on it self. They couldn't even repeal it though.

    You pay for abortions for the same reason women and young people are paying for viagra pills. There's plenty of stuff in there that are covered but would unlikely to be never used.
    Over 50,000 abortions last year does not qualify as "unlikely to be never used" does it?
    Viagra is what got them into trouble to begin with. It shouldn't be sold to anyone under 35. But it's ok as long as my tax dollars are there to bail them out of an unwanted pregnancy.............
    For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
    "The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
    - Thucydides

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  2. #152
    Points: 19,941, Level: 34
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 809
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    invictus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1594
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    8,453
    Points
    19,941
    Level
    34
    Thanks Given
    614
    Thanked 1,584x in 1,215 Posts
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by stjames1_53 View Post
    Over 50,000 abortions last year does not qualify as "unlikely to be never used" does it?
    Viagra is what got them into trouble to begin with. It shouldn't be sold to anyone under 35. But it's ok as long as my tax dollars are there to bail them out of an unwanted pregnancy.............
    Shouldn't in this case the man receive just as much criticism for not using a condom or not pulling out? Although it's true that maintenance of a woman's body is generally more expensive than a man's, I think what they were going for is to put as many people as possible into the same boat. Where insurance is affordable to as many people as possible.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts