We May Get a Conservative Chief Justice

[jet57]

The WSJ has an article on We May Get a Conservative Chief Justice and it's paywall let's me see



And that's it.

Great idea but how would it be possible for Thomas to become Chief Justice?

Your source requires a subscription.

[Chris]

Your source requires a subscription.

Yes. And those cost money.

[jet57]

Yes. And those cost money.

Well, then your source is no good for the discussion. If the whole article can't be researched, then your thread is as limited as your source.

[Calypso Jones]

roberts was wrong and here's why.

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...heres_why.html

2016 started a whole new ballgame. If The President is re-elected......

Justice Roberts was wrong to do this...but...i think the left has something on him. they got him right where they want him.

[Chris]

Well, then your source is no good for the discussion. If the whole article can't be researched, then your thread is as limited as your source.

And yet here we are 80 some posts later. I suggest you're not a good judge of good discussion.

[jet57]

And yet here we are 80 some posts later. I suggest you're not a good judge of good discussion.

But, only about 3 or 4 on the actual subject: I read through the all the pages.

[Chris]

But, only about 3 or 4 on the actual subject: I read through the all the pages.

I can't help strays. So you can read.

[Ethereal]

con·spir·a·cy the·o·ry

/kənˈspirəsē ˈTHiərē,ˈTHirē/


noun

• a belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for a circumstance or event.
  "they sought to account for the attacks in terms of a conspiracy theory"

So are you saying that such a belief cannot be true?

[Ethereal]

When he supports something, he's a libertarian. When he doesn't, he justifies draconian laws being enforced by government force. Pickle in a nutshell, basically been his MO his whole time here

It's easy to stand up for your own freedoms. Not so easy to stand up for the freedom of others.

[MMC]

And yet here we are 80 some posts later. I suggest you're not a good judge of good discussion.

Good thing some bloggers put up the whole WSJ piece.