Joe Biden’s gaffe could sink his US presidency bid

[MMC]

538 gives Trump an 11% chance of winning. Still too big, but Biden’s the overwhelming favorite at this point. Anyone claiming otherwise is just wishcasting.

Relax, Democrats. Biden Can Still Win If He Loses Pennsylvania
Nate Silver, 538

[RichardMZhlubb]

Relax, Democrats. Biden Can Still Win If He Loses Pennsylvania
Nate Silver, 538

I don’t know why you keep mentioning this article? If anything, it shows how Biden is in a much stronger position than Hillary. Biden has numerous paths to 270, far more than Trump.

[MMC]

I don’t know why you keep mentioning this article? If anything, it shows how Biden is in a much stronger position than Hillary. Biden has numerous paths to 270, far more than Trump.

For the same reason I keep mentioning Norpoth.



Professor doubles down on prediction model of Trump's ...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/professor-doubles...
“The Primary Model gives Trump a 91 percent chance of winning in November,” Norpoth said. "This model gets it right for 25 of the 27 elections since 1912, when primaries were introduced." As...




To help you go into depression.

[RichardMZhlubb]

For the same reason I keep mentioning Norpoth.



Professor doubles down on prediction model of Trump's ...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/professor-doubles...
“The Primary Model gives Trump a 91 percent chance of winning in November,” Norpoth said. "This model gets it right for 25 of the 27 elections since 1912, when primaries were introduced." As...




To help you go into depression.

Far from it. I fully understand that you're full of shlt, and I'm looking forward to proving it next week.

[MMC]

Far from it. I fully understand that you're full of shlt, and I'm looking forward to proving it next week.

You should take heart as to what the Doobie Brothers are telling you.

[Peter1469]

Yes, the Economist. It's pathetic how you guys continually link to fly-by-night right wing sites no one ever heard of and then dismiss real journalistic enterprises like the Economist.

‘Economist’ Failed to Disclose Lucrative Beijing Ties

Respected? In the tank for China.

[MisterVeritis]

‘Economist’ Failed to Disclose Lucrative Beijing Ties


Respected? In the tank for China.

"The Economist provided sympathetic coverage of a Chinese tech giant widely considered a national security risk without disclosing the publication's lucrative business relationship with the firm that spanned nearly a decade.Huawei Technologies commissioned the Economist‘s business consulting division to advance its policy agendas and deflect cybersecurity concerns raised by Western governments. The influential British magazine produced reports on a wide range of subjects—including a report on broadband access in the United Kingdom that Huawei credits to have influenced British policy."

[Peter1469]

"The Economist provided sympathetic coverage of a Chinese tech giant widely considered a national security risk without disclosing the publication's lucrative business relationship with the firm that spanned nearly a decade.Huawei Technologies commissioned the Economist‘s business consulting division to advance its policy agendas and deflect cybersecurity concerns raised by Western governments. The influential British magazine produced reports on a wide range of subjects—including a report on broadband access in the United Kingdom that Huawei credits to have influenced British policy."

Where did the supporters of the Economist go?

Is it time to charge and imprison the soft coup supporters?

[MisterVeritis]

Where did the supporters of the Economist go?

Is it time to charge and imprison the soft coup supporters?

Good idea. The nation needs an enema.

[MMC]

Btw Ritchie here is touting Wassermann and the Cook Report. This mope also has come out and said Texas would turn Blue. Yes this election. But then Wassermann is a long time Democrat and democrat Donor. Kind of like Nate Silver is.