Fox losing to worst network in TV history

[carolina73]

I am not the only viewer who saw their election coverage as a stab in the back.

Just putting Chris Wallace in as the commentator was a stab in the back. Especially after his biased debate performance that he was not supposed to be performing in. The 2020 Trump-Wallace debate.

[carolina73]

Again, I could care less what you think. I don't think highly of you, I think you're a low information dummy like most of the other blow-up dolls around here and you need to project falsehoods to soothe your insecurity with yourself.

I have no $#@!s to give about your opinion so you do what it takes to help you sleep at night.

Low information beats no information. I am one up on you as the deflated blow up doll.

[carolina73]

Perhaps you will look askance at that concept; but I certainly will not.

Fair and balanced is precisely what I want, in journalism. (Anything else is essentially a form of yellow journalism, it seems to me.)

The MSM is so biased that FOX was the only mainstream counterpoint. That is why it was so popular. Now you can only watch their talk show hosts for any contrary news to the MSM and FOX news itself.

[pjohns]

The MSM is so biased that FOX was the only mainstream counterpoint. That is why it was so popular. Now you can only watch their talk show hosts for any contrary news to the MSM and FOX news itself.

You are not really wrong here; the MSM is, indeed, biased. (The left seems to think that CNN and MSNBC present the news in a straight up-and-down fashion; which is really rather funny.)

And I would, indeed, like to see a "counterpoint" to them.

But I would not wish for that counterpoint to be a right-wing (or even center-right) presentation of the news. (The opinion hosts, at night, are an entirely different matter.)

Rather, I would much prefer that this counterpoint should be an unbiased presentation of the news (unlike the presentations made by CNN and MSNBC).