Or not. As I noted elsewhere:
If you follow the link in the article, it leads to Science Direct,
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...208?via%3Dihub,
which references
Environmental Research, a legitimate, peer-reviewed scientific journal.
Wikipedia has this to say about that publication:
Environmental Research is a
peer-reviewed environmental science and
environmental health journal published by
Elsevier.
[1] The
editor in chief is
Jose L. Domingo.
[2] The journal's 2017 impact factor of 4.732 placed it 24th (10th percentile) out of 242 journals in the category Environmental Sciences, and 12th (7th percentile) out of 181 journals in the category Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health.
[3]
So: Finding in a legit, peer-review journal with a decent reputation? Sounds like the ball is in YOUR court to actually SHOW that it is bad science, rather than just mindlessly denigrating it.
I'll wait.