User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Judge orders portraits of mostly white past judges tossed from courthouse so

  1. #1
    Points: 44,031, Level: 51
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 1,219
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger First ClassOverdrive25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Sybil Ludington's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5507
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Lansing, KS
    Posts
    6,946
    Points
    44,031
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    13,702
    Thanked 5,497x in 3,308 Posts
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Judge orders portraits of mostly white past judges tossed from courthouse so

    so black defendant can get a fair trial

    A state judge in the liberal bastion of Fairfield County, Va., in the D.C. suburbs, has ordered the removal portraits of past judges in advance of a January 4 trial of an African-American defendant because of what might amount to bad optics that, in turn, could adversely affect the outcome of a trial.


    In an 11-page opinion letter which was issued in response to a motion filed by the defendant, Judge David Bernhard, a former defense attorney, observed that 45 0f the 47 judges whose portraits are on display in the courtrooms of Fairfax Circuit Court in northern Virginia are white, and the decor needs to change “in the furtherance of justice.”


    “[T]he Court is concerned the portraits may serve as unintended but implicit symbols that suggest the courtroom may be a place historically administered by whites for whites, and that thus others are of a lesser standing in the dispensing of justice. The Defendant’s constitutional right to a fair jury trial stands paramount over the countervailing interest of paying homage to the tradition of adorning courtrooms with portraits that honor past jurists.


    “Consequently, the jury trial of the Defendant, and of any other defendant tried before the undersigned judge, shall henceforth proceed in a courtroom devoid of portraits in the furtherance of justice,” the judge concluded.


    continued:
    https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/12...ampaign=bizpac




  2. #2
    Points: 44,031, Level: 51
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 1,219
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger First ClassOverdrive25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Sybil Ludington's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5507
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Lansing, KS
    Posts
    6,946
    Points
    44,031
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    13,702
    Thanked 5,497x in 3,308 Posts
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How did a judge this stupid ever pass the bar?

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sybil Ludington For This Useful Post:

    carolina73 (12-24-2020),Peter1469 (12-24-2020)

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,614, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497494
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,829
    Points
    863,614
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,678
    Thanked 148,504x in 94,946 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Critical Race Theory was advanced in the US first through the law schools.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    carolina73 (12-24-2020),MisterVeritis (12-24-2020),Sybil Ludington (12-24-2020)

  6. #4
    Points: 145,036, Level: 91
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 1,614
    Overall activity: 72.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    carolina73's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    44113
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    58,019
    Points
    145,036
    Level
    91
    Thanks Given
    56,482
    Thanked 44,118x in 28,517 Posts
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He must be looking for advancement in the Democrat Party.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to carolina73 For This Useful Post:

    Sybil Ludington (12-24-2020)

  8. #5
    Points: 5,426, Level: 17
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 324
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second ClassSocialVeteran5000 Experience Points
    EvilCat Breath's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    975
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    1,372
    Points
    5,426
    Level
    17
    Thanks Given
    38
    Thanked 965x in 637 Posts
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.
    George Orwell, 1984

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to EvilCat Breath For This Useful Post:

    Sybil Ludington (12-24-2020)

  10. #6

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 479,212, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 65.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    201348
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    53,436
    Points
    479,212
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,190
    Thanked 46,618x in 25,162 Posts
    Mentioned
    892 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sybil Ludington View Post
    How did a judge this stupid ever pass the bar?
    I read the entire opinion. Let's say that you are an uneducated, barely literate, poor white woman and you are charged with a serious crime in a predominantly black county. You walk into the courtroom with your black lawyer and there's a black judge and a black prosecutor - and pictures of 47 black judges with two white judges adorning the courtroom walls. Do you think that would be a symbol of black dominance? Do you think that it might cross your mind that you you might not get treated equally to the blacks that walk in that courtroom?

    I'm not saying I do or don't buy it - I want to reread the decision again, but for purposes of generating discussion on issues sometimes I find it helpful to put myself in their shoes.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    Captain Obvious (12-24-2020),Private Pickle (12-31-2020)

  12. #7
    Original Ranter
    Points: 314,886, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranYour first Group
    Captain Obvious's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    773942
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    80,473
    Points
    314,886
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    30,199
    Thanked 40,087x in 27,208 Posts
    Mentioned
    1041 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    I read the entire opinion. Let's say that you are an uneducated, barely literate, poor white woman and you are charged with a serious crime in a predominantly black county. You walk into the courtroom with your black lawyer and there's a black judge and a black prosecutor - and pictures of 47 black judges with two white judges adorning the courtroom walls. Do you think that would be a symbol of black dominance? Do you think that it might cross your mind that you you might not get treated equally to the blacks that walk in that courtroom?

    I'm not saying I do or don't buy it - I want to reread the decision again, but for purposes of generating discussion on issues sometimes I find it helpful to put myself in their shoes.
    It might be like voting in North Korea with huge portraits of two Kim's displayed by the voting box surrounded by armed North Korean guards.
    my junk is ugly

  13. #8

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 479,212, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 65.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    201348
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    53,436
    Points
    479,212
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,190
    Thanked 46,618x in 25,162 Posts
    Mentioned
    892 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Obvious View Post
    It might be like voting in North Korea with huge portraits of two Kim's displayed by the voting box surrounded by armed North Korean guards.
    LOL. Not quite but your point is well taken.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts