Exposed: The Media Has Been Lying About The Capitol Protests

[TheLiquidGuy]

No, it's an opinion piece consisting of an argument based on facts. Why you find that laughable is beyond me.

It starts with very bold assertions. "Not one of them is true. Not. One." And then uses conjecture to get there.

It's better called a 'speculation piece' than an 'opinion piece.'

For the life of me, I cannot understand why anyone would think to use that article as the basis for a thread entitled:

"EXPOSED: The media has been lying..."

Seriously?

[TheLiquidGuy]

Because, you don't really expose the truth, you just repeat the same talking points all liberals are spouting.

You talk about people changing? You sure have, you've gone from being opinionated but reasonable to, hateful and bitter.

projection?

[TheLiquidGuy]

*Leave my awesome double girls out of this. That's totally sexist*

The only thing "sexist" is your misandrist remark.

*What do you think happened January 6th?*

What happened or what one believes happened on 1/6/21 has absolutely nothing to do with House Majority's rush to judgement before all the facts were known, which is something you say you adhere to. So I ask again,

"Why did the House Majority rush to judgement for a second impeachment before "all the facts are known ??

I don't think they rushed. I think they were slow.

Also. they knew all the facts that they should have needed to know. We all knew them. Republicans were never gonna convict Trump even if he was leading the charge up the steps.

[TheLiquidGuy]

Yup, and I'm still waiting for the Federal LEO's to indict and try private citizen Trump for "incitement of insurrection".

He incited it, over months. He did. Just because the criminal code won't recognize that fact doesn't mean he didn't incite them.

The impeachment trial is not a criminal trial. It doesn't need to meet that standard.

The most bipartisan house impeachment and Senate conviction vote in history should give you a clue that wrong was done.

[TheLiquidGuy]

The media is an enemy of the people. We need to bring MSNBC and CNN et al... to trial.. convict and execute these Communist Traitors

Isn't there a rule against calling for people's execution ?

[The Booman]

Isn't there a rule against calling for people's execution ?

Ooh! He actually did what you lot claim Trump sorta wouda done....

[Peter1469]

No he didn't.

He incited it, over months. He did. Just because the criminal code won't recognize that fact doesn't mean he didn't incite them.

The impeachment trial is not a criminal trial. It doesn't need to meet that standard.

The most bipartisan house impeachment and Senate conviction vote in history should give you a clue that wrong was done.

I have listed the elements of incitement of riot and insurrection a couple of times. Trump did not meet those elements.

[stjames1_53]

He incited it, over months. He did. Just because the criminal code won't recognize that fact doesn't mean he didn't incite them.

The impeachment trial is not a criminal trial. It doesn't need to meet that standard.

The most bipartisan house impeachment and Senate conviction vote in history should give you a clue that wrong was done.

You know what? You cannot prove any of that.
If you claimed Trump was responsible for all the war zones being created over the past year and beyond. You're claiming Trump is responsible for what a bunch of ass wipes think and do?
That's like blaming the Jews for Hitler's execution of Jews. "It's their fault they are Jews!"
The only people responsible for a riot are the people themselves. It is what they feel that's important.
Trump got elected.
Let's burn the country down!
It's Trump's fault we are destroying the neighborhoods we live in.
It is Trump's fault we rape and loot.
It is Trump's fault that we murder...
well, it is because of Trump that we allow our worst behavior to com e out.
Why should they take responsibility when they can blame it on others..................
hardly woke....................
How much did Biden donate of his paycheck for the next four years?

[hanger4]

I don't think they rushed. I think they were slow.

Also. they knew all the facts that they should have needed to know. We all knew them. Republicans were never gonna convict Trump even if he was leading the charge up the steps.

He incited it, over months. He did. Just because the criminal code won't recognize that fact doesn't mean he didn't incite them.

The impeachment trial is not a criminal trial. It doesn't need to meet that standard.

The most bipartisan house impeachment and Senate conviction vote in history should give you a clue that wrong was done.

"Incitement of insurrection" ain't no jaywalking charge, it's treasonous. And I'm fully aware and you've made quite clear you're not interested in justice being served, but just a partisan political bludgeon being swung.

B Clinton's impeachment in the House lasted 70 plus days for the undisputed penny-ante charge of perjury and suborning perjury (OoJ). Of course the House Majority rushed to judgement, then Pelosi held the article for 12 days to ensure a Democratic Majority was in the Senate. All partisan politics TLG, all.

[Chris]

It starts with very bold assertions. "Not one of them is true. Not. One." And then uses conjecture to get there.

It's better called a 'speculation piece' than an 'opinion piece.'

For the life of me, I cannot understand why anyone would think to use that article as the basis for a thread entitled:

"EXPOSED: The media has been lying..."

Seriously?

I think you need to read the OP again. It starts with a factual set of false claims by the media. Then it generalizes "Not one of them is true. Not. One." One of them referring to the false stories presented.

Do you have a challenge to anyone of those false stories?