Exposed: The Media Has Been Lying About The Capitol Protests

[hanger4]

(chuckle) If the source is not credible and shown to be false, THAT is not ad-hom dude: it's pointing out facts.

You're still wrong jet57;

*The ad hominem attack involves the faulty premise that an attack against the source of an argument necessarily constitutes a successful refutation of that argument.*

[hanger4]

You're just lying.

/

Back it up little man ??

[Chris]

(chuckle) If the source is not credible and shown to be false, THAT is not ad-hom dude: it's pointing out facts.

But you did not show that. You merely declare as if your word alone is credible.

[TheLiquidGuy]

You just keep repeating yourself and I keep rebutting you, it gets tiresome.

You have lost. You know it. Be graceful about it or continue like this and lose credibility. It's your choice.

Do you deny the article has AT LEAST three factual errors?

1) Weapons were found inside. (unrefuted by you)
2) No one accused zip tie guy of planning hostages (unrefuted)
3) There were rioters who expressed intent to kill officials. (unrefuted)

[Chris]

You have lost. You know it. Be graceful about it or continue like this and lose credibility. It's your choice.

Do you deny the article has AT LEAST three factual errors?

1) Weapons were found inside. (unrefuted by you)
2) No one accused zip tie guy of planning hostages (unrefuted)
3) There were rioters who expressed intent to kill officials. (unrefuted)

Same three rebutted points. Boring.

[DGUtley]

You're just lying. /

Back it up little man ??

Notice

@hanger4 and @jet57 TB'd for insults and bad faith posting.

If you have questions or concerns about this moderation action, please use the Report button to let us know.

[mamooth]

At this stage, no need to continue. Nothing new is being added. The Trump cult has made their choice of tactics clear, over and over.

1. Declare the media is evil and biased for reporting what law enforcement told them.
2. Redefine the word "armed" to a new speshul PC definition of "holding a gun".
3. Deny reality by claiming all the evidence is just a liberal media hoax, and that we need to believe the Trump cult's story over our lying eyes and ears.
4. Deflect, deflect, deflect. Troll, troll, troll.
5. Throw out a buttloads of nonsense from a conspiracy website, and then declare the burden of proof is on those debunking the crap. That is, shift the burden of proof.

Why do they act that way? Because they still endorse their side's violent fascist coup attempt, and they very much want to see more violent fascist coup attempts. Yes, it is that obvious. They know they can't win democratically any more, so they've renounced democracy.

Trump supporters engaged in a violent armed fascist coup attempt. That's not debatable by any honest person, hence the Trump cultists are all trying to debate it. However, they're only brave enough to try that in online SafeSpaces where they can gather in mobs. They know that if they tried defending their violent fascist coup out in the real world, the decent people would spit at the ground and walk away.

[TheLiquidGuy]

Same three rebutted points. Boring.

not one was rebutted. but I guess I have your answer