Legal Discrimination’s Return: Whites Banned From City’s Police Oversight Board

[Sybil Ludington]

[COLOR=var(--text)]What happens when you remove “al” from “equality”? You get “equity,” leftists’ latest obsession and social-engineering justification, one eliminating even the superficial claim that equality is a priority. Thus did we just hear about white high-school students being investigated for advocating equality — and thus do we now hear about the Madison, Wisconsin, Police Civilian Oversight Board (PCOB), whose policy essentially is “No whites need apply.”

[/COLOR]
[COLOR=var(--text)]The notoriously left-wing Madison government had established the board “in response to activists concerned with police relations,” writes the Federalist. “The board’s mission is rather vague: ‘provide input,’ ‘engage in community outreach,’ and ‘make policy-level recommendations.’ What the board is not vague about is who is allowed to participate.” The site then continues:


continued:
https://thenewamerican.com/legal-dis...eid=2c06d5fdc1
[/COLOR]

[murdock]

[COLOR=var(--text)]What happens when you remove “al” from “equality”? You get “equity,” leftists’ latest obsession and social-engineering justification, one eliminating even the superficial claim that equality is a priority. Thus did we just hear about white high-school students being investigated for advocating equality — and thus do we now hear about the Madison, Wisconsin, Police Civilian Oversight Board (PCOB), whose policy essentially is “No whites need apply.”

[/COLOR]
[COLOR=var(--text)]The notoriously left-wing Madison government had established the board “in response to activists concerned with police relations,” writes the Federalist. “The board’s mission is rather vague: ‘provide input,’ ‘engage in community outreach,’ and ‘make policy-level recommendations.’ What the board is not vague about is who is allowed to participate.” The site then continues:


continued:
https://thenewamerican.com/legal-dis...eid=2c06d5fdc1
[/COLOR]

The retards can't exist without whites

[Standing Wolf]

When the legal cases that result from bureaucratic stupidity like this reach the federal courts and these racist policies are slapped down, perhaps the courts will get more love from conservatives for their "activism". The White citizens being denied employment and representation must have a strong advocate in their struggles against discrimination by state and local officials, and the federal courts, including of course the SCOTUS, are that advocate. When local control becomes local bigotry and local violation of the U.S. Constitution, I think a little "statism" is called for.

[Cotton1]

I hate racists

[FindersKeepers]

When the legal cases that result from bureaucratic stupidity like this reach the federal courts and these racist policies are slapped down, perhaps the courts will get more love from conservatives for their "activism". The White citizens being denied employment and representation must have a strong advocate in their struggles against discrimination by state and local officials, and the federal courts, including of course the SCOTUS, are that advocate. When local control becomes local bigotry and local violation of the U.S. Constitution, I think a little "statism" is called for.

I think part of this current wave of retribution we're seeing focuses on the idea that it's time whites felt what it was like to be shut out of various industries and parts of society.

The problem is that you can never erase the sins of the past by piling more sins on top of them. You cannot punish the innocent for the crimes of the guilty.

They're headed in the wrong direction with this type of thing, but I don't think they see it that way.

[Peter1469]

When the legal cases that result from bureaucratic stupidity like this reach the federal courts and these racist policies are slapped down, perhaps the courts will get more love from conservatives for their "activism". The White citizens being denied employment and representation must have a strong advocate in their struggles against discrimination by state and local officials, and the federal courts, including of course the SCOTUS, are that advocate. When local control becomes local bigotry and local violation of the U.S. Constitution, I think a little "statism" is called for.

Using courts to enforce laws is not statism.

[Standing Wolf]

Using courts to enforce laws is not statism.

Oh, I know. That's why I put the word in quotes. But too often when the SCOTUS or another federal court overturns a state or local law or policy, that is one of the things that supporters will claim is happening. Cries of "states' rights" and "local control" resound, and we're told that the courts, particularly the federal courts, have no right to interfere - that they should only be sending these matters back to state legislatures and local authorities to be revised.