Members banned from this thread: Tahuyaman


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 16 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 158

Thread: Proof Bill Barr was little more than a political operative

  1. #61
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hanger4 View Post
    *How do you know the leak about it becoming a criminal investigation was not Barr’s attempted surprise*

    A year before the 2020 elections ?? Seriously TLG ??
    Cmon now......you knew he would deflect to other issues concerning Barr. Liquids assumes because there is a perceived dispute about the Chinese, that he can play on that. To bad an Inspector General Weighed in.


    But he really can't.



    From The Washington Examiner:

    Politicization problems exist in U.S. spy agency assessments on foreign influence in the 2020 U.S. election, including analysts who appeared to hold back information on Chinese meddling efforts because they disagreed with the Trump administration’s policies, according to an intelligence community inspector.


    Barry Zulauf, an analytic ombudsman and longtime intelligence official, issued a 14-page report obtained by the Washington Examiner to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, revealing his investigation was “conducted in response to IC complaints regarding the election threat issue.” In addition, he lamented the “polarized atmosphere has threatened to undermine the foundations of our Republic, penetrating even into the Intelligence Community.”


    The intelligence community’s classified assessment on foreign influence in the 2020 election, which will not focus on claims of mail-in fraud or unfounded allegations of voting machines flipping millions of votes, was also submitted to Congress on Thursday. Expected in December, the assessment was delayed as senior intelligence officials clashed over the role played by China, and as director of national intelligence, John Ratcliffe sought to include more viewpoints in the final analysis.


    “Given analytic differences in the way Russia and China analysts examined their targets, China analysts appeared hesitant to assess Chinese actions as undue influence or interference. The analysts appeared reluctant to have their analysis on China brought forward because they tend to disagree with the administration’s policies, saying in effect, I don’t want our intelligence used to support those policies,” Zulauf concluded, saying this behavior violated analytic standards requiring independence from political considerations.....snip~



    Inspector: Intel Analysts Downplayed China's Election ...


    https://thepalmierireport.com/inspector-intel...
    Jan 08, 2021 · According to a new report from The Washington Examiner, Intel Analysts downplayed China’s influence in the 2020 election. Exclusive: IC report concluded “China analysts appeared hesitant to assess Chinese actions as undue influence” in 2020 election & “appeared reluctant to have their analysis on China brought forward” b/c they disagreed w/ Trump admin policies.


    Its a Dead issue.....China interfered. Russia Interfered and even Iran Interfered. Its a reality that Liquids refuses to believe.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    donttread (05-08-2021)

  3. #62
    Points: 172,917, Level: 98
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 733
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88545
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    51,904
    Points
    172,917
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,289
    Thanked 20,513x in 14,777 Posts
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLiquidGuy View Post
    A newly declassified intelligence report reveals that there was no attempt by China to interfere in 2020 election.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/chin...rt-says-2021-3




    Now listen to Barr outright lie to the public about it in September 2020.


    37 Second Clip starting at 0:12






    Told ya. He always was a political operative.

    At first he sounded good about getting after the dictator governors and anti trust against the media giants hijacking America.

    Then when he didn't move on what he said he'd do I thought naw he's all talk

    Finally I realized he was a swamp plant who's job it was to delay these necessary actions

  4. #63
    Points: 172,917, Level: 98
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 733
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88545
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    51,904
    Points
    172,917
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,289
    Thanked 20,513x in 14,777 Posts
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    You really should pay more attention to the bull$#@! you try to feed everyone here.

    That report was released how long ago?

    Barr made the statement you posted... when?

    The jury is in now and Barr was a swamp plant, he delayed action on media anti-trust and the abuse of power of the dictator governors knowing that if Biden was awarded the whiter house those things would be much more difficult to challenge.

  5. #64
    Points: 172,917, Level: 98
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 733
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88545
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    51,904
    Points
    172,917
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,289
    Thanked 20,513x in 14,777 Posts
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carolina73 View Post
    Your telling me China did not try to interfere in the election? LOL

    Everyone tries to interfere in our election.The UK, Israel, France...They all want a certain result that benefits them.
    Anyone that says China did not without at least a qualifier is a liar in my book. The only question is where, how and to what degree.
    In turn we saw Obama interfere in Brexit and with the Israeli election as examples of where we do the same.

    We all spy on each other as well.

    I'm guessing we have done far more to influence foreign elections than the world combined has done to us. The real threat to our elections was always tyrfanny from within which I will point out happened even as we fought about external influences.

  6. #65
    Points: 172,917, Level: 98
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 733
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88545
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    51,904
    Points
    172,917
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,289
    Thanked 20,513x in 14,777 Posts
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLiquidGuy View Post
    A newly declassified intelligence report reveals that there was no attempt by China to interfere in 2020 election.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/chin...rt-says-2021-3




    Now listen to Barr outright lie to the public about it in September 2020.


    37 Second Clip starting at 0:12






    Told ya. He always was a political operative.

    Trying to increase racial tension? We did not need China for that. The DNC has done a much better job than they could have.
    I have long said that Barr was all talk then I realized that he was worse than that. A bi-partisan swamp plant who's place was to talk tough and stall. He was going to get after the dictator governors but never tried to, he was going to address media and SM obvious anti-trust violations. But he had no real inbtent to. and by the time the snake in grass's motives were apaprent it was too late.

  7. #66
    Points: 75,653, Level: 67
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 2,097
    Overall activity: 80.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first Group50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Calendar Award
    TheLiquidGuy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2037
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    19,933
    Points
    75,653
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    2,588
    Thanked 2,027x in 1,731 Posts
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carolina73 View Post
    Your telling me China did not try to interfere in the election? LOL
    No. The intelligence community consensus is telling you.


    “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
    rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
    --Donald Trump

    Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.



  8. #67
    Points: 143,738, Level: 91
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 2,912
    Overall activity: 75.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    carolina73's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    43644
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    57,478
    Points
    143,738
    Level
    91
    Thanks Given
    56,058
    Thanked 43,649x in 28,239 Posts
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLiquidGuy View Post
    No. The intelligence community consensus is telling you.
    I could care less what the Deep State says.

    I don't trust liars and they qualify as the worst of the worst.


    I can remember the last time they sold the term consensus of the Intelligence agencies. All 17 of the 16 that included the Coast Guard and the DEA about Russia Russia Russia. Later Brennan said it was 3 and they turned out to be the ones behind the fraud.
    Last edited by carolina73; 05-03-2021 at 12:27 PM.

  9. #68
    Points: 75,653, Level: 67
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 2,097
    Overall activity: 80.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first Group50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Calendar Award
    TheLiquidGuy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2037
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    19,933
    Points
    75,653
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    2,588
    Thanked 2,027x in 1,731 Posts
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carolina73 View Post
    I could care less what the Deep State says.

    I don't trust liars and they qualify as the worst of the worst.


    I can remember the last time they sold the term consensus of the Intelligence agencies. All 17 of the 16 that included the Coast Guard and the DEA about Russia Russia Russia. Later Brennan said it was 3 and they turned out to be the ones behind the fraud.
    Yep, line seven of the creed kicks in.

    Republican Creed
    News is fake
    Polls are fake
    Statistics are fake
    Science is fake
    Judges are rigged
    Elections are rigged
    Career civil servants are deep state
    What you're seeing and hearing is not really happening
    Believe us. Only us.


    “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
    rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
    --Donald Trump

    Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.



  10. #69
    Points: 172,917, Level: 98
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 733
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88545
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    51,904
    Points
    172,917
    Level
    98
    Thanks Given
    18,289
    Thanked 20,513x in 14,777 Posts
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Cmon now......you knew he would deflect to other issues concerning Barr. Liquids assumes because there is a perceived dispute about the Chinese, that he can play on that. To bad an Inspector General Weighed in.


    But he really can't.



    From The Washington Examiner:



    Politicization problems exist in U.S. spy agency assessments on foreign influence in the 2020 U.S. election, including analysts who appeared to hold back information on Chinese meddling efforts because they disagreed with the Trump administration’s policies, according to an intelligence community inspector.


    Barry Zulauf, an analytic ombudsman and longtime intelligence official, issued a 14-page report obtained by the Washington Examiner to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, revealing his investigation was “conducted in response to IC complaints regarding the election threat issue.” In addition, he lamented the “polarized atmosphere has threatened to undermine the foundations of our Republic, penetrating even into the Intelligence Community.”


    The intelligence community’s classified assessment on foreign influence in the 2020 election, which will not focus on claims of mail-in fraud or unfounded allegations of voting machines flipping millions of votes, was also submitted to Congress on Thursday. Expected in December, the assessment was delayed as senior intelligence officials clashed over the role played by China, and as director of national intelligence, John Ratcliffe sought to include more viewpoints in the final analysis.


    “Given analytic differences in the way Russia and China analysts examined their targets, China analysts appeared hesitant to assess Chinese actions as undue influence or interference. The analysts appeared reluctant to have their analysis on China brought forward because they tend to disagree with the administration’s policies, saying in effect, I don’t want our intelligence used to support those policies,” Zulauf concluded, saying this behavior violated analytic standards requiring independence from political considerations.....snip~



    Inspector: Intel Analysts Downplayed China's Election ...


    https://thepalmierireport.com/inspector-intel...
    Jan 08, 2021 · According to a new report from The Washington Examiner, Intel Analysts downplayed China’s influence in the 2020 election. Exclusive: IC report concluded “China analysts appeared hesitant to assess Chinese actions as undue influence” in 2020 election & “appeared reluctant to have their analysis on China brought forward” b/c they disagreed w/ Trump admin policies.


    Its a Dead issue.....China interfered. Russia Interfered and even Iran Interfered. Its a reality that Liquids refuses to believe.
    We all interfere in each other's elections. That's the least of the intrusive things the CIA does for example. We can fix that by pardon the term "defunding political spending" Limit it, stop any tax advantages associated with it. Give the top 5 or more parties an equal chance to get their message out by setting campaign spending limits low enough where they can compete with each other with no need for or use for shady investments foreign or domestic. This would however damage the lucrative influence for sale industry in Washington as well as the Donkephant stranglehold.
    I used to think AG Barr was just all talk until I realized he was just a swamp plant.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to donttread For This Useful Post:

    TheLiquidGuy (05-08-2021)

  12. #70
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70166
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,163x in 27,727 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    We all interfere in each other's elections. That's the least of the intrusive things the CIA does for example. We can fix that by pardon the term "defunding political spending" Limit it, stop any tax advantages associated with it. Give the top 5 or more parties an equal chance to get their message out by setting campaign spending limits low enough where they can compete with each other with no need for or use for shady investments foreign or domestic. This would however damage the lucrative influence for sale industry in Washington as well as the Donkephant stranglehold.
    I used to think AG Barr was just all talk until I realized he was just a swamp plant.
    It would be better if outside state spending could be ended. Let the people of whatever state be the ones to spend the money for their own State's Election. Start there.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts