Supreme Court agrees to hear major gun rights case

[BenjaminO]

Replacing members is not court packing. Please try to consider the meaning of phrases before you misuse them.

Appointing Supreme Court justices, via the constitutional process, to the traditional nine seat SCOTUS, is not "court packing". Are you seriously this uninformed?

So long as the judges being appointed are conservative.

[countryboy]

So long as the judges being appointed are conservative.

No, period. It's never been considered court packing. Attempting to add Justices to the court beyond the traditional nine, is the definition of "court packing". Were you seriously unaware of this? Wow.

FDR was the last US president to attempt to pack the SCOTUS. Damn dude, peruse a history book once in a while.

[MisterVeritis]

Replacing members is not court packing. Please try to consider the meaning of phrases before you misuse them.

So long as the judges being appointed are conservative.

All justices should be conservative, if you mean, as I do, the justices should conserve the original meaning and intention of the Constitution.

Anything less is imperfect and tilts toward tyranny.

Replacing members is not court packing.

[Chris]

So long as the judges being appointed are conservative.

It's not called court packing.

[MMC]

No, period. It's never been considered court packing. Attempting to add Justices to the court beyond the traditional nine, is the definition of "court packing". Were you seriously unaware of this? Wow.

FDR was the last US president to attempt to pack the SCOTUS. Damn dude, peruse a history book once in a while.

Meh, the Leftness didnt say Obama was court packing when he appointed Kagan and Sotomayor. Then got stuffed with Picking Garland.

[countryboy]

Meh, the Leftness didnt say Obama was court packing when he appointed Kagan and Sotomayor. Then got stuffed with Picking Garland.

Neither did the "right", that's the point.

[PaulyWalnuts]

I never leave home with out a heater.. Who cares what the law is?

[Chris]

Neither did the "right", that's the point.

No one did, it's just another case of the left twisting words and writing new definitions.

[countryboy]

I just heard they won't even hear the case until their next term, in October. So much for swift justice.

[MMC]

Neither did the "right", that's the point.

Leftists start with dishonesty. People should expect that off the top.