The Right of Revolution in the American Founding

[Mister D]

He's back! lol

[Chris]

Okay well, I posted the credible definition Ständestaat as a corporate state that began under feudalism. Secondly such a state had nothing to do with our founding and you haven't shown anything that says it did. The point is that you are comparing apples to oranges because you have not grasped Ständestaat​ and are misusing the word.

Right, but corporate back then meant something different than it does today. Anachronism dismissed.

[jet57]

Right, but corporate back then meant something different than it does today. Anachronism dismissed.

Oh please. You’re floundering now. You’re OP is oil and water, it’s been shown, so that’s it. I’m not allowing you to troll you’re way around it.

/

[jet57]

He's back! lol

And your intelligent contribution is - nothing again.

[Chris]

Oh please. You’re floundering now. You’re OP is oil and water, it’s been shown, so that’s it. I’m not allowing you to troll you’re way around it.

/

Then when you say "Ständestaat translates into corporate state" define what you mean by "corporate state." Say something substantial.

[Mister D]

Then when you say "Ständestaat translates into corporate state" define what you mean by "corporate state." Say something substantial.

What is his point? lol That the so called right of resistance is a Medieval inheritance seems clear.

[Chris]

What is his point? lol That the so called right of resistance is a Medieval inheritance seems clear.

To troll the thread off-topic.

[jet57]

To troll the thread off-topic.

The point is correcting your historical nonsense.

[Chris]

The point is correcting your historical nonsense.

But you haven't corrected anything. It's like most other threads you disrupt, telling people they're wrong and you're right, except you never explain what's wrong or right.