The condescension can stop now.
Read what I said: The part of the article that you quoted spells out the convoluted sense in the article. It tries to link two completely different scenarios, one having absolutely nothing to do with the other and the author does nothing to correct that. Therefore, no actual point can be gleaned by reading it.
CRT claims US spreads racist oppression throughout the world. If that's true, then our pull-out from Afghanistan should have removed racist oppression. But it got worse. Therefore CRT is BS.
More convoluted thinking. The racism that "advocates of CRT must be talking about"; because THAT'S not clear either (another fault with the article), must be referring to is the commercialization of third world countries for monetary gain. That is know as exploitation, which this country got going on following WWI: see Standard Oil of New York and the Rockefellers. The disrespect for native people could be described as racism, just like our treatment of the American Indians which was racism, just like our treatment of American blacks was and still is in some circles, racism.
Racism got worse when we pulled out of Afghanistan?? Where do get this silly information? uh, Afghans are racist against Afghans?
The convolution just gets worse? How do explain that?