A man gets just $1 for his fence that was destroyed by a town snow plow...
Joe_Brean_fence.webp
The town is probably responsible for some damage to the damaged fence. However ... it is impossible to put a value on a seriously dilapidated fence,' the judge wrote
Joe_Brean_fence.1.webp
[25]It is appropriate here to mention some of the conduct of the Plaintiff during the trial. As noted earlier, he is not a litigation neophyte. During the trial he referred to the court clerk as “the girl”. I corrected him. A few minutes later, he called the clerk “the girl” again. Throughout the trial, the Plaintiff repeatedly interrupted Mr. Finn, Q.C., and he also interrupted the witnesses and me. He failed to call any reliable evidence as to the cost of labour and materials to repair or replace his fence. When it was explained to him that he had failed to lead any reliable evidence as to quantum, he attempted to change his claim from a claim for damages to one of specific performance.
[26]In short, the Plaintiff has wasted the better part of two days of court docket time, while failing to prove the quantum of his claim. This must be discouraged.
[27]Judgement is entered for the Plaintiff in the nominal amount of one dollar. Given his conduct during the trial, there is no order for costs.
0BJECT.jpg
Bull$#@!.gif
giphy.gif