Transferism, Not Socialism, Is the Drug Americans Are Hooked On
OK, true enough but socialism by any other name is still socialism. The article ignores the historic fact that in the 90s with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the concession to Mises and Hayek in the economic calculation problem, neoMarxists abandoned their old argument advocating for the control of the means of production to advocating for control of the ends of production. Robert Reich's The Answer Isn't Socialism; It's Capitalism That Better Spreads the Benefits of the Productivity Revolution explains that very well....Socialism is state control of the means of production. The intent is that these means are to be used for the public good. By contrast, capitalism is simply private ownership of the means of production. The intent is that these means are to be used to advance the interests of those who own them, which will in turn create conditions of general prosperity that can be enjoyed by all.
...These four in ten Americans, and the politicians who speak for them most vocally, are not advocating socialism at all; they are advocating what we should really call “transferism.” Transferism is a system in which one group of people forces a second group to pay for things that the people believe they, or some third group, should have. Transferism isn’t about controlling the means of production. It is about the forced redistribution of what’s produced....