The defendant chose not guilty.
Members banned from this thread: Mister D |
The defendant chose not guilty.
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." - Patrick Henry
No. Only a claim a year later after the Biden admin hammered the DOJ to find something, anything. This is simply political harassment using the power of government and the left, as usual, believes anything a democrat says even when patently wrong and believes in guilty until proven innocent.
When Donald Trump said to protest “peacefully”, he meant violence.
When he told protesters to “go home”, he meant stay for an insurrection.
And when he told Brad Raffensperger to implement “whatever the correct legal remedy is”, he meant fraud.
War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.
MisterVeritis (01-16-2022),stjames1_53 (01-16-2022)
I do have to wonder if there should be a rule against blatantly lying about what another member has said.
I see you are still quite unhinged. I'm not sure why I cause some people to become so unglued.Your military experience is laughable.
It's not an issue of being an "expert" or having the "right to pass judgment". Those are just your strawmen.Just as mine is. It gives you zero right to pass judgment on a use of force case. Just because you were issued ROE (and never had to use them) gives you zero experience in use of force.
Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
--John Adams
Yes, you keep asserting this. But you still haven't explained WHY it's not relevant.
How would you know the difference between military ROE and law enforcement ROE?Military rules of engagement are far different than law enforcement.
Where did I say or imply that it was?Knowledge of firearms isn’t the same as a knowledge of police procedures.
I am "trained and accredited" in the use of force by the US military. It was my specialization.Even if you’ve studied and researched police procedures, your opinions won’t be a valid as someone who is actually trained and accredited.
Again, I am not the one arguing "expertise" here, you are. You keep using the word "expert" because it's so subjective and so easy to manipulate. You and little PP will just define "expert" to mean whatever you want it to mean, just like you do with the term "conspiracy theory". You cannot make a real argument, so you just make appeals to authority and traffic in meaningless jargon.While a person who has read about medicine extensively and who has experience as let’s say a firefighter, would have more knowledge than your average person, his credibility will not exceed an actual medical doctor. Claiming otherwise just wouldn’t make sense.
An expert is someone who is educated and accredited in their specific field. An expert can also be someone who has mastered a skill or discipline to the point of being an authority. Words have meanings and expert refers to someone with accreditation and authoritative knowledge.
Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
--John Adams
I find your lack of faith...disturbing...
-Darth Vader
When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.“ - Benjamin Franklin.
“When people get used to preferential treatment equal treatment seems like discrimination.” - Thomas Sowell
When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.“ - Benjamin Franklin.
“When people get used to preferential treatment equal treatment seems like discrimination.” - Thomas Sowell