Twitter bans ads that deny climate change

[Carl Young]

https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproje...ange-rcna25707


BERLIN — Twitter says it will no longer allow advertisers on its site who deny the scientific consensus on climate change, echoing a policy already in place at Google.

“Ads shouldn’t detract from important conversations about the climate crisis,”

More at link

Posters are forbidden to discuss the direction of this change, up or down, but only that it's 'changing'. Science is not a subject which should be openly discussed in public. It's a new Victorian age with science now a substitute for sex.

[hanger4]

BTW @invictus HRC's email server was physically handed over to the DOJ/FBI

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbs...-email-server/

[Tahuyaman]

If any ads should be banned it’s those that say there’s such a thing as scientific consensus.

[Jeb!]

Nuclear war with Russia ending the planet is more likely to happen in my lifetime than climate change ending the planet.

[Cotton1]

Posters are forbidden to discuss the direction of this change, up or down, but only that it's 'changing'. Science is not a subject which should be openly discussed in public. It's a new Victorian age with science now a substitute for sex.

Good thing. Have you checked out the liberal females lately ? Terrible sight

[testsubjectalpha]

is there a scientific consensus on climate change?

https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproje...ange-rcna25707


BERLIN — Twitter says it will no longer allow advertisers on its site who deny the scientific consensus on climate change, echoing a policy already in place at Google.

“Ads shouldn’t detract from important conversations about the climate crisis,”

More at link

[Cotton1]

is there a scientific consensus on climate change?

Not sure. They are waiting on Greta Dumberg to make a decision

[testsubjectalpha]

Let's not bring Greta into it. She is a spirited young woman, a mustang. Greta does not constitute a consensus.

[OLD GUY IN FLORIDA]

You have a link to that because I'm pretty sure you're pulling this out of your butt-hole...


Regardless, the main point stands... There was legitimate reasons to investigate Trump... And that's based on Trumps own behavior... And quite frankly, it's also a proven fact that Trump would have accepted a foreign interference. Given the fact that Trumps jumped at the chance to get info on Hilary from that Russian lawyer....

I know you want to pretend like this issue was pulled out of thin air but it simply wasn't. To compare that to the ridiculous "Democrats are baby eating cabal" belief is pure ridiculous nonsense and you folks are like drowning people, looking to grab anything to stay afloat...

Amazing. You still believe in the Russia Russia Russia hoax!!!!

[testsubjectalpha]

Sounds like the Democrats were colluding with Russia.

Amazing. You still believe in the Russia Russia Russia hoax!!!!