Sen. Gillibrand Accuses SCOTUS Justices of Perjury

[TheLiquidGuy]

Any woman who gets an abortion and any man that supports it, is pro-death.

The pro-death cult will fund the poor mothers who want to kill their babies. If they really believe in the right to kill babies.

I see this frequently with people who have reached the end of their rationality rope.

Instead of admit anything, they resort to using inaccurate, but emotionally charged descriptions. They appeal to emotion, because the rational argument has been lost. Arguing with such people is usually useless.

[Hoosier8]

I see this frequently with people who have reached the end of their rationality rope.

Instead of admit anything, they resort to using inaccurate, but emotionally charged descriptions. They appeal to emotion, because the rational argument has been lost. Arguing with such people is usually useless.

The linguistic opposite of pro-life is pro-death. Who was it that said “words matter”?

[stjames1_53]

I see this frequently with people who have reached the end of their rationality rope.

Instead of admit anything, they resort to using inaccurate, but emotionally charged descriptions. They appeal to emotion, because the rational argument has been lost. Arguing with such people is usually useless.

Each one of my words were correctly chosen and accurate. Killing anything is still killing.
You kill it to keep it from becoming. You kill it to stop it before it transforms. That is fear.
And you say I'm emotional? smh
At least I'm not killing anything, much less out of fear.

[TheLiquidGuy]

The linguistic opposite of pro-life is pro-death. Who was it that said “words matter”?

But it is very clearly inaccurate. Yet you guys persist because it is an effective emotional appeal. For “pro-death” to be accurate, you would need to show people always want to kill the fetus. No one wants that.

if you want to have an honest discussion, stop using that term.

BTW, The linguistic opposite of pro-choice is anti-choice. Lets assess some other terms…

pro-choice: accurate. These people favor the mother choosing all the time.
pro-life: accurate. These people always want the fetus to live.
anti-choice: accurate. These people never want the pregnant woman to have a choice.

[Hoosier8]

But it is very clearly inaccurate. Yet you guys persist because it is an effective emotional appeal. For “pro-death” to be accurate, you would need to show people always want to kill the fetus. No one wants that.

if you want to have an honest discussion, stop using that term.

BTW, The linguistic opposite of pro-choice is anti-choice. Lets assess some other terms…

pro-choice: accurate. These people favor the mother choosing all the time.
pro-life: accurate. These people always want the fetus to live.
anti-choice: accurate. These people never want the pregnant woman to have a choice.

Here you do exactly what you say is wrong.

[stjames1_53]

But it is very clearly inaccurate. Yet you guys persist because it is an effective emotional appeal. For “pro-death” to be accurate, you would need to show people always want to kill the fetus. No one wants that.

if you want to have an honest discussion, stop using that term.

BTW, The linguistic opposite of pro-choice is anti-choice. Lets assess some other terms…

pro-choice: accurate. These people favor the mother choosing all the time.
pro-life: accurate. These people always want the fetus to live.
anti-choice: accurate. These people never want the pregnant woman to have a choice.

So, killing isn't killing......................huh, I would have never known that.

[Admiral Ackbar]

I agree that ridicule is an unfair weapon. That's why I only use it after unfair weapons have been used on me. Take for an example, your ridicule of me...








So, you managed to say something intelligent. Now, try for coherent.

I was not ridiculing only pointing out the irony of Communists line of thinking