Maxine Waters and ignoring the SCOTUS

[Peter1469]

An insurgent. A seditious person.

[donttread]

and a law breaker

Yes. My point is basically that she is the government she rebels against , unlike the others in @mamooth examples

[mamooth]

I can't predict what may happen as you pretend to do, but I would hope the Party trying so hard to restrict freedom of speech, promoting race hatred, and destroying prosperity in this country will be the ones judged most harshly in any positive future...........

The nation and the world _are_ judging you Republicans harshly, because of those things, and for the many other things you've embraced on your march towards fascism.

Got any new books you want to burn today?

Go any more restrictions for women in mind?

Any more white supremacists you want to suck up to, besides the usual ones?

I thank you for such a perfect example of the "Every Republican accusation is a confession" rule. That rule holds 100% of the time, no exceptions.

[MisterVeritis]

The nation and the world _are_ judging you Republicans harshly, because of those things, and for the many other things you've embraced on your march towards fascism.

Got any new books you want to burn today?

Go any more restrictions for women in mind?

Any more white supremacists you want to suck up to, besides the usual ones?

I thank you for such a perfect example of the "Every Republican accusation is a confession" rule. That rule holds 100% of the time, no exceptions.

Fascists are members of your team.

[mamooth]

Yes. My point is basically that she is the government she rebels against , unlike the others in mamooth examples

Your point seems to be that you think those who voted for the Fugitive Slave Laws are awesome people.

My, you are in a tough spot. You either have to admit your "YOU MUST ALWAYS BACK THE LAW!" premise is garbage, or you have to endorse slavery. Which one do you choose?

[DGUtley]

Your point seems to be that you think those who voted for the Fugitive Slave Laws are awesome people. My, you are in a tough spot. You either have to admit your "YOU MUST ALWAYS BACK THE LAW!" premise is garbage, or you have to endorse slavery. Which one do you choose?

Which one do you choose? It's either: Follow the Court or Ignore the court and you endorse an insurrection. Which one do you choose?

[mamooth]

Which one do you choose? It's either: Follow the Court or Ignore the court and you endorse an insurrection.

I point out your obvious false dichotomy fallacy.

In contrast, my situation is not fallacious, since you are using an "only two choices exist" assumption.

[donttread]

Your point seems to be that you think those who voted for the Fugitive Slave Laws are awesome people.

My, you are in a tough spot. You either have to admit your "YOU MUST ALWAYS BACK THE LAW!" premise is garbage, or you have to endorse slavery. Which one do you choose?

Breaking the law for principal can be a bold and even patriotic thing to do. But part of that means understanding their may be consequences and facing them.
Secondly, this is the Constitution we are talking about The 1973 SC was wrong to have nullified the Constitution. Their job is to uphold it.