User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 62

Thread: By Ignorance or by Design

  1. #1
    Points: 84,798, Level: 70
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 52
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    27584
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    11,128
    Points
    84,798
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    14,094
    Thanked 9,553x in 5,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    By Ignorance or by Design

    I would like to share something I put together, it is 153 pages. It is a chronology for why I believe we are seeing events taking place in the world. Much of this you will already know about, and much of it I have also written about before. But I put it together in a way as to show the big picture, and where I believe all of this is headed. It is non partisan, and there is something to hate, and agree with on all sides. If I got something wrong, or there is something you disagree with I hope you will still continue reading, as there is a lot of information here. This is long so I will have to post it in parts since it wont all fit in one post. If anyone would like a pdf copy for easier reading dm me your email, and I will send it to you.



    By Ignorance or by Design


    Introduction
    President Trump
    Digital Transition
    Population Control
    Suppressing the Cure
    Chemicals and More
    Suppressing the Cure, NAC
    Suppressing the Cure, Vitamin D
    Hospice
    War
    Manufacturing a Crisis
    Manufacturing a Crisis & Suppressing the Cur
    Mind Control: Torture and Hypnosis
    Vaccines
    Deception and Loss of Freedom
    Presidents Bush Sr and Jr
    President Obama
    President Trump 2
    President Biden
    Surveillance
    Artificial Intelligence and the True Objective
    Further Study on Sodium Benzoate
    Permissions




    By Ignorance or By Design


    The current events we see occurring in the world right now are deeply rooted in the past, and to better uncover the truth, we need to look back in time and go deep down the rabbit hole. The truth matters because it determines what we will stand for, prepare for, or allow. I hope you stay with me, or at least skim through, it will make sense as I go on.


    In this chronology, I will share actual events that took place, and all will be verifiable with a quick internet search. My goal is to lay out these events in a concise manner that flows quickly and doesn’t spend too much time on any one subject.


    I will use quotes from medical studies, news articles, and other easily searched online sources, so that what you hear from me is not just my words or opinions but verifiable facts, and events that actually took place.


    As I cover events, I will move forward and backward through time, because it’s important to see how things connect. Though they may not be in order, if you follow, you will see patterns that emerge. I believe that there is a lot we don’t see even though it is sometimes happening before our eyes, part of the reason being we don’t know what happened in history. Much of what happened in history is redacted and classified.


    Throughout history the builders and architects have always shaped the world by pushing the masses in a desired direction. Only now we have the advent of social media, and their power is without limits, shaping the world in real time. I invite you to look at the world through unbiased eyes, beyond the colors red or blue, and see facts just as they are beyond party or political ideals, raw truth just as it is.


    This is about truth, the plight of humanity, and the egregious crimes committed against them in the name of power.


    President Trump


    When Donald Trump was president he began to take strange actions, all of them with a specific pattern.


    In April of 2017 Trump signed into law the “internet privacy repeal”. This removed consumers rights to how their data would be used and harvested. This gave the companies total control of how to harvest and utilize customers data. This new law was a clear violation of our privacy and civil liberties. https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...privacy-repeal



    In January of 2018 the NSA internet surveillance program was renewed. This program is for spying on foreign agents, but as often happens Americans information is scooped up in the process. Privacy advocates say it allows the NSA and other intelligence agencies to grab data belonging to Americans in a way that represents an affront to the US Constitution. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1F82MK



    In August of 2019 the Trump administration asked congress to reauthorize the NSA’s Deactivated calls records program, it is a domestic spying program used on our own citizens. After 9-11 our Gov was illegally spying on their own citizens. In 2013 Edward Snowden revealed the existence of the program. Congress then passed it into law making the spying on it’s own citizens legal. Trump asked that it be made permanent. https://www.benton.org/headlines/tru...ecords-program


    Trump floated the idea of a new agency called HARPA, that would use AI to screen subjects for mental health issues for gun ownership. The troubling aspect is that they will determine who has the potential for violence and is mentally fit by data collected through their smart devices. https://themillenniumreport.com/2019...y-gun-control/


    August of 2019 after a slew of mass shootings, Trump was heavily criticized after he said we need to start locking people up. He said we need to bring back the institutions. https://www.alternet.org/2019/08/tru...tal-illnesses/ This was not a new concept for him. Long before he ever became President he spoke of locking up the mentally ill. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-th...orell-donilon/ It went deeper than just institutionalizing the mentally ill, but the homeless too. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a9100151.html While on the way to a speaking event in California he said he would create an individual task force to deal with this issue. https://www.latimes.com/california/s...eless-problems


    During the Trump administration in 6 states across the Midwest, the Military began testing testing high altitude solar powered balloons, allowing the pentagon to conduct continuous surveillance on it’s own citizens. An FCC filing was made explaining that the craft are being designed to provide “persistence surveillance systems to locate and deter narcotics trafficking, and homeland security threats”. There are concerns among civil rights activists who suggest surveillance operations will necessarily collect large amounts of data on citizens going about their day to day lives. https://www.newsweek.com/pentagon-su...ything-1452323


    Also during the Trump admin, Attorney William Barr asked for encryption to be designed with a back door for Police access. The Director of Cyber security has warned that we can’t make a back door that only the good guys can go through. William Barr, along with others, asked Facebook to give authorities a way to read encrypted messages form ordinary users. https://apnews.com/article/william-b...442abdf66c5d0f


    Trump called on the DOJ to work with Social Media companies to identify mass shooters. https://thehill.com/policy/technolog...-identify-mass


    The Trump administration was calling on implementing pre-crime tactics and surveillance against his own fellow Americans. William Barr said we would use early engagement tactics, and on October 16th 2019, he sent out a Memorandum to all United States Attorney’s, all heads of Department Components, and all Law Enforcement Agencies. What was most worrisome in this memorandum is his talk of the use of early engagement tactics that the new program would utilize, and how they were born of the posture we adopted with respect to terrorist threats. It is suggested that mass surveillance and the use of algorithms to analyze bulk data for vaguely defined symptoms of mental illness will be used. Individuals who are deemed violent or of a terroristic threat before they commit a crime, will be subject to detention, court ordered mental health treatment, and or substance abuse counseling. These are the same exact excuses that China is currently using. They are stating that they are getting to these people before they commit a crime and reforming them. https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...&sidebar=false


    The Trump administration was moving full speed ahead with this agenda. He signed an executive order, ordering William Barr to establish a new commission to study causes of crime and policing practices. They were to have a have a one year study to see what they would like to implement and what works best. Some of the issues they were studying were as follows:


    1) Increase respect for law.


    2) Challenges to law enforcement associated with mental illness, homelessness, substance abuse, and other social factors that influence crime and strain criminal justice resources.


    3) The need to promote public respect for the law & law enforcement officers.


    4) The use of targeted deterrence approaches to reduce violent crime.


    5) New and developing methodologies, technologies, and best practices for combating criminal activity, delinquency, and public disorder.
    https://www.govexec.com/management/2...ctices/160911/


    It seems to me that there is somewhat of a theme, and an obvious agenda taking form. It is also noteworthy to mention that Representative Will Hurd of Texas publicly announced during the Trump admin, that he would not be seeking re-election. He would step down from congress to serve our nation in a different way, here is a quote in his own words.


    “We are in a geopolitical competition with China to have the world’s most important economy. There is a global race to be the leader in artificial intelligence, because whoever dominates AI will rule the world. We face growing cyberattacks every day. Extreme poverty, lack of economic opportunity and violence in Central America is placing unbearable pressure on our borders. While Congress has a role in these issues, so does the private sector and civil society.


    After reflecting on how best to help our country address these challenges, I have made the decision to not seek reelection for the 23rd Congressional District of Texas in order to pursue opportunities outside the halls of Congress to solve problems at the nexus between technology and national security.”
    https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/po...3-3c01cfa5dd88
    On the one hand Rep. Hurd says seeking advancements in AI is to help our nation, on the other hand he says it is because whoever dominates AI will rule the world. This is a statement that should concern us all.


    DARPA and the Pentagon begin seeking AI to uncover enemy thoughts. But just what are those enemy thoughts? Who is the enemy? https://www.activistpost.com/2018/03...ughts-war.html


    A short time before the start of the pandemic a team was put together by the Trump administration to help us become the world leader in AI. Coincidentally many of the people who were on that team were also on the team responsible for opening up the economy and contact tracing.


    A document was released telling of what was needed in order for us to surpass China.


    In this document it describes what they have labeled as our "Legacy Systems". Just what is a legacy system anyways?


    Cash
    In person shopping
    In person doctor visits
    Driving
    Freedom of privacy
    Personal ownership

    In this document it describes how our nation cannot move forward because we are being held back by these legacy systems. Coincidentally the pandemic opened the door for all of this to take fruition.


    They want to do away with rural living and urbanize cities, they want to wire the entire world, not just create smart cities but a smart world. Rolling out 5G is part of it. This would be a world of total surveillance, total control, and loss of liberties. https://epic.org/wp-content/uploads/...uction-pt9.pdf
    Also, part of that document talks about the need to collect a DNA database. It tells of how America is being held back, because of our rights. https://www.mintpressnews.com/nation...llance/266820/


    The Trump admin put teams, task forces, and committees in place to implement this new world vision. During that same time China went full Orwell, the EU went Digital looking to create a new world. The Digital EU is not just a database but a platform that will give corporations total control over all facets of society. The same members of Trump’s committees and task forces are also heavily invested in the Digital EU. https://www.digitaleurope.org/corporate/


    US tech giants invest billions to keep data in Europe. https://walstreetonline.blogspot.com...in-Europe.html


    More on the Trump actions a bit later let us look deeper at the world


    Digital Transition


    We have been told that plans like Agenda 21 are nothing more than murmurs of conspiracy theorists. The truth is these are actual agendas, not conspiracy at all. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...ents/agenda21/ The vision for Agenda 21 was adopted into Agenda 2030 https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda And now the Great Reset. https://www.weforum.org/great-reset These agendas are presented under the guise of benevolence and the need to create a better world. In reality, they have merely hijacked the green movement. Much like the Digital EU, which could be seen as the first step, these agendas are completely corporate owned. These are agendas that would give corporations control of the world. These are the same corporations who have destroyed and polluted the earth. They will give us a new green world, one controlled by them. Not only that, they have a strong lean towards total surveillance, transhumanism & population control. This would mean the end of freedom and liberty, the end of what it means to be a human being.


    Policy Horizons Canada is a strategic foresight organization within the Government of Canada with a mandate to help the Government develop future-oriented policy and programs, and they have a vision for the future based on biodigital convergence. In their own words, “By tapping into the nervous system and manipulating neurons, tech can be added to an organism to alter its function and purpose. New human bodies and new senses of identity could arise as the convergence continues”. This vision also includes (in their own words), “Altering the human genome – our core biological attributes and characteristics, Monitoring, altering and manipulating human thoughts and behaviours, New ways to monitor, manage, and influence bodily functions”. https://horizons.gc.ca/en/2020/02/11...l-convergence/


    Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, has expressed that the "fourth industrial revolution" will involve changing what it means to be human. https://thepulse.one/2022/02/04/klau...ifying-humans/ “Transhumanism is part of the transformation that comes with the fourth Industrial Revolution, as artificial intelligence (AI) will surpass even the best human performances at specific tasks. The new technologies “will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us—they will become part of us, Schwab declares”. https://libertarianinstitute.org/art...manist-future/


    “Build back better”, it’s not just a Biden slogan, but the “Great Reset” slogan. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/...lism-heres-how


    Elon Musk has long been vocal about his vision and belief that man must merge with machine. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/13/elon-musk-humans-merge-machines-cyborg-artificial-intelligence-robots.html “becoming “one” with them would allow humans to stay relevant in an age where automation and technology threaten our usefulness as organic organisms”. https://futurism.com/elon-musks-and-...-with-machines


    Scientist Charles Lieber and his team have developed syringe-injectable electronics. “Seamless and minimally invasive three-dimensional interpenetration of electronics within artificial or natural structures could allow for continuous monitoring and manipulation of their properties”. https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2015.115


    (2022) Elon Musk’s brain chip firm Neuralink lines up clinical trials in humans. https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...ials-in-humans Controversy emerges as physicians sue Elon, “The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) claims that Neuralink’s experimental technology and testing at UC Davis, funded by taxpayer cash, resulted in the monkeys suffering serious health problems and death as a result of implanted electrodes in their brains”. 15 out of 23 monkeys were killed in the trial. https://techstory.in/elon-musks-neur...eys-out-of-23/


    Elon is not alone in his endeavor to link man to machine, meet his rival Blackrock. https://blackrockneurotech.com/


    As mentioned above Trump implemented the idea of a new government agency called HARPA that would monitor people for mental illness. Trump’s vision is now becoming a reality under the current Biden administration using the name ARPA-H. https://geopolitics.co/2021/05/08/tr...-dictatorship/ This is being implemented under the guise of “health”. During the State of the Union, Biden called on congress to fund DARPA for health. https://www.fedscoop.com/darpa-for-h...-h-biden-sotu/ “ARPA-H will be tasked with building high-risk, high-reward capabilities (or platforms) to drive biomedical breakthroughs – ranging from molecular to societal – that would provide transformative solutions for all patients”. https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/adva...health-arpa-h/ “To improve the U.S. government’s capabilities to speed research that can improve the health of all Americans”. https://www.nih.gov/arpa-h


    The NeuroRights Foundation: “Any technology that records or interferes with brain activity is defined as Neurotechnology. Neurotechnology, especially brain-computer interfaces , has the potential to foundationally alter society. In the coming years, it will be possible to decode thought from neural activity or enhance cognitive ability by linking the brain directly to digital networks. Such innovations could challenge the very notion of what it means to be human”. https://neurorightsfoundation.org/


    Rethinking the Brain Machine Interface: Polina Anikeeva 2015, “ Maybe we can start hacking the brain, without it ever noticing that it is being hacked”.







    Whitney Webb | Neurorights and Neuromarkets. https://www.$#@!ute.com/video/WnOJVTKbJev5/


    Now let us move a bit back in time, and look at another piece of the puzzle, “population control”.


    Population control


    In December of 1974 the Kissinger report is born. US global population strategy is discussed, and actions to create conditions for fertility decline. This document, that is still part of the US Government discusses the need to not allow the population to exceed 8 billion, (keep in mind we are currently at 7.9 billion) and to take steps to reduce the world population especially in third world nations where population is rising the fastest.


    “The World Population Plan of Action is not self-enforcing and will require vigorous efforts by interested countries, U.N. agencies and other international bodies to make it effective”. “Concentration on key countries. Assistance for population moderation should give primary emphasis to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is special U.S. political and strategic interest”. “this goal would result in 500 million fewer people in 2000 and about 3 billion fewer in 2050. Attainment of this goal will require greatly intensified population programs”. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf


    “Investigations by EIR have uncovered a planning apparatus operating outside the control of the White House whose sole purpose is to reduce the world's population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease, and any other means necessary. This apparatus, which includes various levels of the government, is determining U.S.foreign policy”.


    “There is a single theme behind all our work-we must reduce population levels," said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department's Office of Population Affairs (OPA). "Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut.


    Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it "The professionals," said Ferguson, "aren't interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population-or else we will have trouble”. https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1...population.pdf


    William Paddock on extermination: “The following is excerpted from an interview with William Paddock made available to EIR. Paddock is outspoken proponent of global population reduction, and a
    self-professed supporter of the Global 2000 doctrine.


    Q. : Can it be done without the pain and suffering?


    A: I don't think so at all. I don't think so for a couple of reasons. First of all, speaking of the population growth rate, to level off or drop, the problem is that the people who are going to cause the stress, in the next 20 years, are already here, they're born, they're walking around. Half the population is under the age of 15. It would be well if no one had any more kids, between now and the year 2000, but the big problem's already there. The other reason is, we don't know how to motivate people to want to have fewer children. We just don't know how to do it. …


    Malthus, in his dismal theorem, said that the only check on population growth is starvation and misery”. https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1...population.pdf


    The Global 2000 Report: “Given the premise of no change in the rate of technological advance, the report predicts that the projected growth of the world's population from 4 billion in 1975 to 6.35 billion in A.D. 2000 will lead to severe regional water shortages, extensive deforestation, irreparable deterioration of agricultural soils, and other horrors. The conclusion a policy-maker is supposed to draw is that these consequences must be forestalled by stopping population growth short, by whatever means”. https://archive.org/details/global20...ge/n7/mode/2up


    Subcommittee gathers to discuss the Global 2000 Report, discussing the future state of the world and the need for population control. “The President also made it clear that he wanted us to develop a
    quick and effective response to the report. He has asked a group of us to work with other agencies which have expertise on these issues and to develop this response for him. We are now engaged in that task”.


    “Despite these depressing forebodings, the Global 2000 Report ends on a potentially upbeat note. Disaster need not be our inevitable fate, the globalists tell us. These projections will materialize only if we fail to take the "vigorous, determined new initiatives" necessary to change the course of present trends and present policies”. https://www.jec.senate.gov/reports/9...port (998).pdf


    “We lowered child and other mortality rates, through cheap tricks with medicine. . . . We $#@!ed up with DDT. Malaria, a major killer, was eradicated. It was the wrong thing to do-we upset the natural balance. We let too many people live. Maybe we' ll get lucky and there will be another great killer”. https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1...0_a_map_of.pdf


    David Attenborough: The planet can’t cope with overpopulation: “The naturalist David Attenborough once said the creature he finds "most extraordinary" is a nine-month-old human baby. But now he believes the planet can’t sustain many more.


    In an interview for BBC Newsnight, the 92-year-old British broadcaster said: “In the long run, population growth has to come to an end”. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/...verpopulation/


    Bill Gates has a warning about population growth: “Rapid population growth in some of Africa’s poorest countries could put at risk future progress towards reducing global poverty and improving health, according to a report by the philanthropic foundation of Bill Gates”. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/...sk-says-gates/


    At UN, Gore Demands ‘Ubiquitous’ Population Control for Climate. https://www.climatedepot.com/2018/12...l-for-climate/


    The Overpopulation Project: A list of Organizations Dealing with Overpopulation. https://overpopulation-project.com/o...verpopulation/


    United nations scrubs it’s page discussing population control. https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/population/


    World Health Organization scrubs it’s page discussing population control. https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/90/2/12-040212/en/


    “Human population planning is the practice of intentionally controlling the growth rate of a human population. The practice, traditionally referred to as population control”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_population_planning


    Suppressing the cure


    In 1976 Dr. Burzynski discovers a cure for cancer. He discovered a strain of peptides and found that people with cancer lacked these peptides. He began giving his cancer patients a peptide called Antineoplaston. In 1986 he presented 40 cured patients to the Texas medical board. The FDA did everything in their power to stop him. They suspended his license and kept him in court for years. Cured patients were testifying on his behalf, so time and time again judges could find no fault. But the FDA wouldn’t give up suppressing his cure, they continued to do so for 40 years, until recently. It’s hard to fathom how many people have died from cancer in the last 40 years world wide, and the people who we made responsible for our health were the ones that prevented the cure from coming out.





    Chemicals & More


    Additives in Kids' Foods Could Cause Disease and Disability, Researchers Warn: “Some of the most prevalent compounds found in food and its packaging cause the most harm, disrupting puberty, inciting obesity and damaging future fertility”. https://www.newsweek.com/food-additi...ns-say-1039869


    Food additives that are known to cause infertility in both men and women, cancer, cardiovascular & heart damage. In many of these cases the additives are unnecessary. https://www.ewg.org/consumer-guides/...tassiumbromate


    For example, there is a seemingly harmless ingredient that is in nearly everything. It is called sodium benzoate. It is used as a preservative, as well as an acid and flavor enhancer, but it does so much more. For one, it is used in the pharmaceutical industry to treat psychiatric illness, including schizophrenia and psychosis. Not sure about you, but that doesn’t sit well with me. It has been shown to cause infertility, cancer, DNA damage, and it starves mitochondria of oxygen, damaging them at the cellular level. It has been shown to reduce a hormone called leptin that is responsible for telling your body it is satiated, resulting in obesity. Not only that but low levels of leptin also negatively affect fertility. The FDA considers it to be a safe additive. As if that dirty laundry list wasn’t already long enough, the worst part is that sodium benzoate can form benzene when combined with citric acid. Benzene is a known carcinogen.


    The FDA considers this additive safe as long as levels are below a certain level per item. However, if you happen to use cosmetic products, or eat processed foods a short trip around the house reading labels will show you just how much you are being exposed to. You will find it in your hand soaps, shampoo, bodywash, wet wipes, processed foods, and god forbid you eat foods with citrus in them or vitamins, because you will be forming low levels of benzene in your body on a daily basis. Benzene accumulates over time, what happens after 20 years of every day exposure? Not only does benzene form in the body but in the foods, drinks and products themselves. In some products it forms during processing, some during storage, light and heat speed up the process, and certain products contain both citric acid and sodium benzoate, and that is the recipe for benzene, so you know what that means.


    What’s more is that sodium benzoate is made from stuff like Toluene, Benzotrichloride and phthalic anhydride. These themselves are toxic compounds, between them they are often byproducts of manufacturing things like crude oil, coal tar, making coke from coal, and uranium mining. They are used in making plastics, paint thinners, and so on. These toxic compounds are then refined, and put into our food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical supply and labeled as safe by the FDA.


    (For further study on sodium benzoate please see page 142)




    2015 New Study: Pesticides a “Major Cause” of Infertility: “Male fertility is declining, and for years researchers have been trying to figure out why. The numbers may seem shocking, but between 60-80 million couples around the world are having a difficult time conceiving, and there is a likely culprit”. https://naturalsociety.com/new-study...e-dysfunction/


    Pesticides in produce linked with reduced fertility in women: “Eating fruits and vegetables with high amounts of pesticide residue—such as strawberries, spinach, peppers, or grapes—may reduce women’s chances of conceiving and bearing children”. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hs...rtility-women/


    Environmental Toxins and Infertility: “While much of the decrease in fertility worldwide is by choice, an increasing number of couples, especially in industrialized countries, are finding conception more difficult and damaged babies more common. The research is quite clear that metals and chemicals in air, water, food, and health-and-beauty aids are damaging fertility in many ways. These toxicants are causing men to experience relentlessly decreasing sperm count and function while women are suffering progressively worse anovulation, impaired implantation, and loss of fetal viability”. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pm...es/PMC6396757/


    Cancer health effects of pesticides: “The preponderance of evidence uncovered in our systematic review indicated a positive relationship between exposure to pesticides and development of some cancers, particularly brain, prostate, and kidney cancers, as well as NHL and leukemia. A number of the studies on children found increased risk of cancer associated with critical periods of exposure, both prenatal and postnatal, and with parental exposure at work. Most studies showed increased risk, and many showed dose-response relationships. Other reviews have suggested a possible link between pesticide exposure and certain cancers, and further studies have been recommended due to limitations innate in the design of cohort and case-control studies”. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pm...es/PMC2231435/


    “Air Fresheners Contain Chemicals That Have Negative Effects. Air fresheners, a product most Americans use at least once a day, often contain chemicals that can negatively affect hormones and reproductive development, especially in babies. Those conclusions come from research conducted by the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), which found that of 14 popular air fresheners, only two did not contain toxic substances known as phthalates.


    Air fresheners are big business in the US, where sales of these products rake in $1.72 billion every year. But surprisingly, air fresheners are not subject to any governmental testing, nor do any federal agencies require manufacturers to meet specific safety standards. As it stands right now, air fresheners can contain any amount of phthalates. These chemicals are known to disrupt hormones, and can be particularly dangerous for babies and young children. According to the NRDC, The State of California notes that five types of phthalates—including one that is found in air freshener products—are “known to cause birth defects or reproductive harm.” https://www.yourlawyer.com/environme...te-phthalates/


    “Consistent with in vitro and animal research, studies of human populations have reported associations between fluoride exposure and damage to the male reproductive system. Most notably, a scientist at the Food & Drug Administration reported in 1994 that populations in the United States with more than 3 ppm fluoride in their water had lower “total fertility rates” than populations with lower fluoride levels. (Freni 1994). While 3 ppm is a higher concentration than used in water fluoridation programs (0.7 to 1.2 ppm), it is still considered a “safe” level by the EPA”. https://fluoridealert.org/studies/fertility01/


    “Groundbreaking new research has linked sodium fluoride to cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. Researchers found that fluoride consumption directly stimulates the hardening of your arteries, a condition known as atherosclerosis that is highly correlated with the #1 killer. Sodium fluoride is currently added to the water supply of many cities worldwide, despite extreme opposition from health professionals and previous studies linking it to decreased IQ and infertility”. https://naturalsociety.com/breaking-...-new-research/


    “Are Your Cosmetics Making You Infertile”? https://naturalfertilitybreakthrough...you-infertile/


    “More than half of popular cosmetics being sold in the US and Canada are likely to contain high levels of toxic chemicals called polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a new study has warned. Worryingly, previous research has linked certain PFAS to a range of health issues, including kidney cancer, testicular cancer, hypertension, thyroid disease, low birth weight and immunotoxicity in children.


    Professor Graham Peaslee, who led the study, said: 'PFAS is a persistent chemical - when it gets into the bloodstream, it stays there and accumulates”. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...als/ar-AAL3Eh0


    In 1975, one year after the kissinger report, a mattress fire retardant law was passed requiring furniture manufacturers to start making products that met certain flammability standards. https://www.naturalmattressfinder.co...in-mattresses/ From then on furniture was made with fire retardants. The very mattresses we sleep on leaching chemicals that cause cancer, heart, neurological issues and infertility. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/top...ants/index.cfm


    Flame Retardants in Mattresses are linked to infertility and miscarriage: “The worst offenders lurking in conventional mattresses are Flame Retardants- a whole array of scary chemicals including, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE), Firemaster 550, and Chlorinated tris. Even the government is concerned about this stuff!


    “Flame retardants are some of the worst endocrine disruptors and they off-gas for years after mattresses are purchased. Flame retardants disrupt thyroid function, reduce human fertility, disrupt normal fetal and child development, and may be carcinogenic. Various types of flame retardants have been linked to decreased sperm concentrations, reduced likelihood of clinical pregnancy, time to pregnancy, and higher miscarriage rate”.


    “The worst part about flame retardants is that they tend to bioaccumulate- this means that as you are exposed to flame retardants across your lifetime, the toxins build up in your body. We are exposed to flame retardants in our mattresses, our upholstered furniture, carpets, curtains, fabric blinds, televisions, computers, wires, cables, some building and construction materials, and transportation products, such as parts of cars, airplanes, and trains”. https://www.tomakeamommy.com/toxins-...d-miscarriage/


    Potentially harmful chemicals found in plastic toys: "Out of 419 chemicals found in hard, soft and foam plastic materials used in children toys, we identified 126 substances that can potentially harm children's health either via cancer or non-cancer effects, including 31 plasticizers, 18 flame retardants, and 8 fragrances. Being harmful in our study means that for these chemicals, estimated exposure doses exceed regulatory Reference Doses (RfD) or cancer risks exceed regulatory risk thresholds”. https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0222124552.htm


    Prescription drug deaths and adverse reactions in America: “According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, adverse drug events, or ADE, cause 1.3 million emergency department visits each year. Over 350,000 patients annually need to be hospitalized for treatment after landing in the E.R. for ADE’s”.


    “These adverse drug reactions account for a whopping 106,000 deaths a year”. https://www.newsmax.com/health/healt...19/id/1018133/


    Coronavirus infects male genital tract: “Testicular pain, erectile dysfunction, reduced sperm count and quality, decreased fertility are direct consequence of infection, new study shows”. https://news.northwestern.edu/storie...-and-prostate/


    Serious Illness From Covid Linked To Infertility Risks: “There is evidence to suggest that infection with SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to impact both male fertility, female fertility, and certainly the health of a pregnancy of someone infected,” said Dr. Jennifer Kawwass, a reproductive endocrinologist and associate professor at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta”. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/sexua...might-rcna2868
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Just AnotherPerson For This Useful Post:

    donttread (07-01-2022),FindersKeepers (06-29-2022),MisterVeritis (06-28-2022),Peter1469 (06-29-2022)

  3. #2
    Points: 262,895, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 89.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307726
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,157
    Points
    262,895
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,449
    Thanked 39,100x in 27,771 Posts
    Mentioned
    385 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It is good to see you again.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    Just AnotherPerson (06-28-2022)

  5. #3
    Points: 84,798, Level: 70
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 52
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    27584
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    11,128
    Points
    84,798
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    14,094
    Thanked 9,553x in 5,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you Mister V, it's good to see you too : )
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Just AnotherPerson For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-28-2022)

  7. #4
    Points: 430,479, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307722
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    182,743
    Points
    430,479
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,115
    Thanked 76,737x in 55,433 Posts
    Mentioned
    695 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Things happen for a variety of reasons.
    When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.“ - Benjamin Franklin.


    “When people get used to preferential treatment equal treatment seems like discrimination.” - Thomas Sowell

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    Just AnotherPerson (06-28-2022)

  9. #5
    Points: 84,798, Level: 70
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 52
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    27584
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    11,128
    Points
    84,798
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    14,094
    Thanked 9,553x in 5,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    2 of 13

    Bye, bye, baby? Birthrates are declining globally: “Birthrates are falling globally. In many countries, COVID-19 has suppressed population growth by causing a decline in births, migration and life expectancy”. “China has experienced a fertility collapse. According to the latest census released in May, China is losing roughly 400,000 people every year”. “China could lose between 600 and 700 million people from its population by 2100”.


    “That’s right: 600 and 700 million people, or about half of its total population today”. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/...y-why-matters/


    Suppressing the Cure, NAC


    NAC (N-Acetyl Cysteine): “Cysteine is a semi-essential amino acid”.


    “It’s considered semi-essential because your body can produce it from other amino acids, namely methionine and serine. Along with two other amino acids — glutamine and glycine — NAC is necessary to make and replenish glutathione”.


    “Glutathione is one of your body’s most important antioxidants — compounds that help neutralize free radicals that can damage cells and tissues in your body”.


    “It’s essential for immune health and for fighting cellular damage. Some researchers believe it may even contribute to longevity”.


    “Its antioxidant properties be beneficial for numerous other ailments caused by oxidative stress, such as heart disease, infertility, and some mental health conditions”.


    “NAC plays an important role in your body’s detoxification process. It can help prevent side effects of drugs and environmental toxins”.


    “May improve fertility in both men and women”. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition...OC_TITLE_HDR_4



    FDA bans NAC. https://suzycohen.com/articles/say-g...c-supplements/ “Over the years, we’ve watched the FDA strip away ingredients and supplements that actually work”. https://www.ironmagazine.com/2021/na...ed-by-the-fda/ “The Natural Products Association (NPA) on Monday filed an amended lawsuit against FDA in an ongoing fight over the legality of NAC (N-acetyl-L-cysteine) in dietary supplements”. https://www.naturalproductsinsider.c...-fda-nac-fight


    “NAC has always been cheap and widely available. I am the furthest thing from a conspiracy theorist, but this quiet, sudden ban strikes me as curious, as many of the benefits of NAC could, in theory, be used to help combat COVID-19 as well as a host of other maladies. In fact, there are several clinical trials studying NAC as a treatment for COVID-19”. https://pathfinding.substack.com/p/fda-nac-ban?s=r




    Suppressing the Cure, Vitamin D


    “Vitamin D and fertility: a systematic review: There is some evidence that in addition to sex steroid hormones, the classic regulators of human reproduction, vitamin D also modulates reproductive processes in women and men”. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22275473/




    “Low Vitamin D Levels Linked to Advanced Cancers: “More than three-fourths of people with a variety of cancers have low levels of vitamin D, and the lowest levels are associated with more advanced cancers, a new study suggests”. https://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20...vanced-cancers


    “Low levels of vitamin D may be a cause of high blood pressure, according to a new study”. https://www.webmd.com/hypertension-h...blood-pressure


    “Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to the onset of diabetes”. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28341729/


    “Research suggests that people with very low levels of vitamin D in their blood, a condition known as vitamin D deficiency, are more likely to develop Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia”. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-...s/faq-20111272


    “Recent evidence has demonstrated that individuals deficient in vitamin D are more likely to have cardiovascular disease (CVD) or are at risk of developing incident CVD”. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pm...es/PMC2851242/


    “Low levels of vitamin D prior to catching COVID-19 were linked to worse illness, a study found.
    Vitamin D helps bolster the immune system to tackle viruses that attack the lungs, researchers said.
    Vitamin D is "one piece of the complex puzzle" underlying severe COVID-19, the scientists cautioned”. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...?ocid=msedgntp


    “Scientists Say ‘Health Warning’ Needed on Vit D/COVID-19 Preprint: A preprint study, showing that vitamin D (calcifediol, [25(OH)D3]) given to patients hospitalized with COVID-19 reduces mortality by 60%, has been met with a raft of criticism from experts who urge caution when interpreting the results”. https://www.chronicleshealth.com/new...d-19-preprint/


    “Doctors Keep Ignoring the Medical Research on Vitamin D and Covid: Most experts—scientists and doctors—have not taken Vitamin D seriously, despite the growing evidence, because it is made in the mystical touch of sun on skin rather than by white-coated technicians in a laboratory”. https://www.commondreams.org/views/2...in-d-and-covid


    “Vitamin D: The truth about an alleged Covid ‘cover-up’: There are many treatments that have been suggested for Covid-19”.


    “Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin and vitamin D - all are, or were, being studied. Suggesting that a treatment could be effective and then finding it isn't upon further research is all part of the normal scientific process”.


    “But online, early or low quality research can be shared out of context. And the confusion this creates can be exploited by people promoting conspiracy theories”. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-56180921


    Vitamin pills and supplements aren't helping most people, doctors say: “The vitamin pills you think will do your body good aren't actually doing very much to keep you healthy, doctors say”. https://www.today.com/health/vitamin...rs-say-t122663


    The Vitamin D Epidemic and its Health Consequences: “Vitamin D deficiency is now recognized as an epidemic in the United States. The major source of vitamin D for both children and adults is from sensible sun exposure. There is mounting scientific evidence that implicates vitamin D deficiency with an increased risk of type I diabetes, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, cardiovascular heart disease, and many common deadly cancers”. https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/...00?login=false


    “Your body also makes vitamin D when direct sunlight converts a chemical in your skin into an active form of the vitamin (calciferol)”. https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-sup...d/art-20363792


    A Bill Gates Venture Aims To Spray Dust Into The Atmosphere To Block The Sun: “Microsoft’s billionaire founder Bill Gates is financially backing the development of sun-dimming technology that would potentially reflect sunlight out of Earth’s atmosphere, triggering a global cooling effect. The Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx), launched by Harvard University scientists, aims to examine this solution by spraying non-toxic calcium carbonate (CaCO3) dust into the atmosphere — a sun-reflecting aerosol that may offset the effects of global warming”. https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielco...h=7c69413a793b


    Why Your Doctor’s Advice to Avoid the Sun Has been Harming You All These Years: “Public health officials have been recommending long sleeves, hats, and copious sunscreen for years. They say avoiding the sun’s harmful rays is the best way to protect your health and prevent cancer. But a new study reveals that such advice may be doing more harm than good. As it turns out, most people in the United States don’t get enough sun”. https://ladyfreethinker.org/study-yo...l-these-years/


    Study finds Nearly 80 Popular Sunscreens have Cancer-Causing Chemical. https://blackdoctor.org/sunscreen-recall-cancer/


    Sunscreen makers withdraw products found to contain cancer-causing substance: “Recalls regarding carcinogens (cancer-causing substances) in drugs have reached the sunscreen aisle. In July 2021, Johnson & Johnson recalled five aerosol sunscreen products and CVS stopped selling two sunscreen products because of the presence of the carcinogen benzene. The moves came after an online pharmacy identified traces of benzene in dozens of sunscreen products and petitioned the FDA to investigate. The same pharmacy (Valisure LLC) was also responsible for testing that triggered recalls in 2019 and 2020 of heartburn and diabetes medications found to contain the carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine”. https://www.health.harvard.edu/stayi...sing-substance


    Hospice


    In the US, Over the course of 2019, there were 4,840 Medicare certified hospices in operation based on claims data, in that year 1.60 million medicare beneficiaries received care in hospice. 51.6 percent of Medicare decedents were enrolled in hospice at the time of death. https://www.nhpco.org/nhpcos-new-fac...ent-diagnoses/


    “Private equity investors, are likely to stay bullish on hospice. Multiple firms and PE-backed hospices have told Hospice News that they have no intention of slowing down on hospice deals during 2022, contributing to a trend that has been building for several years. Private equity hospice transactions rose nearly 25% between 2011 to 2020, according to a recent industry transaction report that M&A advisory firm The Braff Group shared with Hospice News”. https://hospicenews.com/2021/12/14/t...spice-in-2022/


    “The U.S. hospice market size was valued at USD 32.1 billion in 2021 and is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.20% over the forecast period. The rising geriatric population coupled with the increasing prevalence of chronic as well as age-associated diseases is anticipated to boost the market growth”. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/in...hospice-market


    1990 Hospice’s patient recruiting under fire: “Hospice Care Chicagoland, a branch of the nation`s largest for-profit hospice program, examines the medical charts of nursing-home patients, looking for terminally ill people to enroll, a practice that hospice and legal experts say is unusual and may be an invasion of privacy.


    The company, a local branch of Florida-based Hospice Care Inc., includes a clause in some of its contracts with nursing homes that requires Hospice Care sales representatives be given access to records of patients not enrolled in the hospice program. Nursing homes have signed contracts with Hospice Care in consideration for potential referrals from hospice care to the homes”. https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...710-story.html


    Morphine/ativan $#@!tail: “OK.. i have wondered this since i was an aide... i totally agree that euthanization is wrong.. but in a way we do it often.. in LTC.. especially those on hospice we give res so much morphine and ativan scheduled.. .25 to .5 roxanol q hour sometimes that they die much quicker... now i agree in quality over quantity but.. why do they schedule roxanol and stuff? why couldn't it be q 1 hr PRN for s/s pain or discomfort? I always am leery of giving so much roxanol to a dying patient any opinions”?




    “I felt the same way at first. Until I had been a nurse in LTC for awhile and gotten attached to the residents. Dying is a process, sometimes a very long one. Usually in LTC, and I've seen it many times, there are stages. They stop talking. They stop eating. They stop drinking. They don't get up anymore. So sad. How do we know what they feel? Are they in pain?


    One indication for morphine (roxanol) is increased respiration's. They can't get enough oxygen so they breathe faster. Even so, the mouth becomes white with effort and mottling may begin. So we use the drug to lower the respirations so they become deeper and slower, more efficient. Otherwise the poor soul feels like they are drowning.


    Yes, morphine can hasten death. But at this point, we don't want them to suffer any more. If it were your loved one, you'd want them out of their misery. It's very hard, I question it every time. But I do it. Then I sit with the resident and talk quietly to them. I love them. I help the family get through it. It's what we do. That's the reason. IMHO”. https://allnurses.com/morphine-ativan-$#@!tail-t78698/




    Did Hospice rush your loved ones death?: “The hospice worker talked to me about admitting him instead of returning to the nursing home. I agreed to this and arrangements were made. He was transferred later that day and was alert and in good spirits. The next morning he was unresponsive and stayed that way until he passed. They gave him morphine and ativan around the clock”. “I was just wondering if anyone else had the feeling that death felt a little rushed once their loved one was placed in Hospice”. https://www.agingcare.com/Discussion...ath-162802.htm




    2016 “A Texas hospice owner is being investigated for allegedly ordering nurses to deliberately overdose patients in an attempt to hasten their death and maximize the company’s profits. According to a search warrant and affidavit obtained by NBC 5, Novus was being investigated for allegedly overcharging the government for medical services and recruiting patients not qualified for hospice.


    The investigation led to the discovery of disturbing claims from staff members. Multiple nurses claim that Harris ordered them to intentionally overdose hospice patients to hasten their deaths and increase profits.


    According to documents, the FBI claims Harris ordered two company executives to find him “patients who would die within 24 hours.”


    Harris is also accused of sending a nurse a text message that said, “You need to make this patient go bye-bye.” https://www.wsbtv.com/news/trending-...bye/192577602/


    “Fourteen people have been arrested in connection with a hospice scam out of San Bernardino County that defrauded over $4 million dollars from Medicare and Medi-Cal.


    California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the arrests Thursday, with the scam involving two hospice care facilities in the Inland Empire.


    "We alleged that these 14 individuals conspired together to cheat and defraud the Medicare and Medical-Cal system of more than $4.2 million dollars," said Bonta.


    The facilities, New Hope Hospice in the city of Upland and Sterling Hospice Care in Colton, allegedly enrolled patients, some without their knowledge or understanding of hospice.


    Bonta says that in many cases the patients were not terminally ill, which put their health in danger by limiting their access to medical care.


    "When a patient is enrolled in hospice care they are no longer eligible to receive medical treatment to prolong their life," added Bonta”. https://abc7.com/san-bernardino-coun...ests/11600437/


    “Hospice care requires hard conversations that lead to difficult decisions by healthcare professionals and their patients and families. One of the most challenging discussions is about initiating, maintaining or withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) as a patient nears the end of life.


    Such decisions are complicated by multiple medical guidelines and ethical issues, and compounded by patients’ and families’ emotions, their difficult questions about withholding food and water at the end of life, and the religious, cultural, spiritual and personal influences that surround a loved one’s imminent death.


    Healthcare professionals are advised to encourage family members to follow accepted hospice guidelines around food and water at the end of life:


    Encourage family members to provide alternative forms of nourishment: conversation, loving touch, music, singing, poetry, humor, pet visits, gentle massage, reading, prayers or other acts of caring and love”. https://www.vitas.com/for-healthcare...-your-patients


    (A Study) Discomfort in Nursing Home Patients With Severe Dementia in Whom Artificial Nutrition and Hydration Is Forgone:


    Background: “While there is debate about whether it may be better to forgo than to initiate artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in nursing home patients with severe dementia, the consequences of forgoing ANH in these patients, in particular their discomfort, have not yet been investigated.


    Results: Decisions to forgo ANH were made most often in severely demented, female patients with an acute illness as the most important diagnosis at that time. The mean level of discomfort was highest at the time of the decision and decreased in the days thereafter. There were substantial differences in level of discomfort between patients. Dyspnea, restlessness, and physicians’ observations of pain and dehydration were associated with higher levels of discomfort. Furthermore, patients who were awake had higher levels of observed discomfort than patients who were asleep.


    Most variables did not have a significant longitudinal influence on discomfort, either in the bivariate or in the multivariate analysis. However, vomiting, myoclonus, and seizures did have a significant influence on discomfort in the bivariate analyses (DS-DAT score differences when present, 2.8, 2.4, and −1.2, respectively), but these symptoms were not included in the multivariate analysis because they were present in fewer than 10% of the patients.


    Conclusions: Discomfort in patients with severe dementia is difficult to measure, since most of these patients lose the ability to verbalize their feelings. However, a few instruments have been developed specifically to assess pain and/or discomfort in patients with dementia based on facial expressions, vocalizations, and muscle tension.17-23


    We conducted a prospective observational study in nursing home patients with dementia who scarcely or no longer ate or drank and for whom the decision was made to start or forgo ANH. We studied the characteristics of patients, the level and course of discomfort, and factors that are associated with discomfort”. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...article/765541


    Forgoing Medically Provided Nutrition and Hydration in Children:


    “There is broad consensus that withholding or withdrawing medical interventions is morally permissible when requested by competent patients or, in the case of patients without decision-making capacity, when the interventions no longer confer a benefit to the patient or when the burdens associated with the interventions outweigh the benefits received.


    The withdrawal or withholding of measures such as attempted resuscitation, ventilators, and critical care medications is common in the terminal care of adults and children. In the case of adults, a consensus has emerged in law and ethics that the medical administration of fluid and nutrition is not fundamentally different from other medical interventions such as use of ventilators; therefore, it can be forgone or withdrawn when a competent adult or legally authorized surrogate requests withdrawal or when the intervention no longer provides a net benefit to the patient. In pediatrics, forgoing or withdrawing medically administered fluids and nutrition has been more controversial because of the inability of children to make autonomous decisions and the emotional power of feeding as a basic element of the care of children. This statement reviews the medical, ethical, and legal issues relevant to the withholding or withdrawing of medically provided fluids and nutrition in children. The American Academy of Pediatrics concludes that the withdrawal of medically administered fluids and nutrition for pediatric patients is ethically acceptable in limited circumstances. Ethics consultation is strongly recommended when particularly difficult or controversial decisions are being considered.


    Decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment from critically or terminally ill children are commonly made in US and Canadian hospitals.1–4 Most children who die in American hospitals do so after critical care interventions are withheld or withdrawn.5–8


    The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has stated that it supports allowing the withholding and withdrawing of a medical intervention when the projected burdens of the intervention outweigh the benefits to the child.9 The AAP has also stated that treatment decisions regarding an infant should be based on the judgment that the infant will derive net benefit, concluding that medical treatment that is judged to be harmful, of no benefit, or “futile” is inappropriate and should not be offered or provided.10 Although decisions about withholding or withdrawing treatments when death is at hand are difficult, a broad consensus has emerged that decisions to withhold or withdraw medical interventions are ethically and legally acceptable in many circumstances, and these decisions fall within the authority of parents or guardians in consultation with the child's physician.9


    Nevertheless, the withholding or withdrawing of the medical provision of fluids and nutrition for children remains controversial, in large measure because of the strong emotional and social symbolism associated with feeding children”. https://publications.aap.org/pediatr...-Nutrition-and


    The rise of stealth euthanasia:


    “Medications used to manage pain and other symptoms—opiates, sedatives and barbiturates—can be
    misused to cause death. The intention to kill a patient, not just to treat pain and other symptoms, is becoming more common in palliative and end-of-life care settings. The purpose of this article is to expose disingenuous arguments used to hide intentionality to kill patients in end-of-life care settings.


    Dr. William Burke, a St. Louis neurologist, describes what happens to patients as they undergo death from dehydration: “They will go into seizures. Their skin cracks, their tongue cracks, their lips crack. They may have nosebleeds because of the drying of the mucus membranes, and heaving and vomiting might ensue because of the drying out of the stomach lining. . . . It is an extremely agonizing death.” 6 Even if patients are sedated, how could we be certain that they would feel no pain, thirst, or hunger?


    Many in the field of hospice and palliative care—medical and nursing directors, nurses, social workers,
    and chaplains—as well as physicians across the country, confirm that there is a clear trend toward hastening deaths of patients. Oncologists and primary care practitioners are shocked when their patients, who have chronic or terminal illnesses but are not in the active phase of dying and are not expected to die suddenly, die within days or weeks of entering hospice. Internationally known hospice
    and palliative care leaders confirm these reports.7 These professionals cannot all be wrong or ignorant.


    Many hospice and palliative care physicians are urging, and actually performing, euthanasia by stealth.
    They administer sedatives that in themselves do not cause immediate death, but knowingly cause the conditions that result in death. This misuse of terminal sedation with intent to end life is properly termed “stealth euthanasia”—it is not active euthanasia or passive euthanasia, but a combination of both.1


    It is horrifying that health care professionals—those to whom we entrust our lives—intentionally hasten death while pretending to be providing appropriate end-of-life care. That this is a pretense is becoming more and more evident to patients and families.


    Although Medicare guidelines require patients to have a terminal diagnosis in order to be enrolled in hospice, patients who are not terminal are fraudulently admitted.12 Sometimes patients with chronic conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease or brain damage were admitted to hospice, and then they died from dehydration.13


    Secular bioethical arguments are used to “justify” stealth euthanasia: for example, “poor quality of life,” suggesting that the patient is “better off dead,” or “respect for patient autonomy,” even though many of these patients are not requesting death.


    Traumatized families are reporting the hastened deaths of loved ones, and hospice and palliative care
    providers are warning that euthanasia and stealth euthanasia are sometimes being performed in end-of-
    life care settings. This is not surprising considering who leads the hospice and palliative care industry today.


    The National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO), the leading trade organization for this industry, is the actual legal and corporate successor to the Euthanasia Society of America.15 The Euthanasia Society of America was successively known as the Society for the Right to Die, Choice in Dying, Partnership for Caring, and Last Acts Partnership before finally being absorbed into the NHPCO. This explains the contradiction between the publicly stated hospice mission and the reality in too many clinical settings. It appears that the NHPCO is intent on quietly subverting that life-affirming mission.


    The September 2000 declaration of the World Federation of Right-to-Die Societies, states in part, We wish to draw public attention to the practice of “terminal sedation” or “slow euthanasia” which is
    performed extensively today throughout the world in hospitals, nursing homes, hospices, and in private
    homes. . . . A physician may lawfully administer increasing dosages of regular analgesic and sedative
    drugs that can hasten someone’s death as long as the declared intention is to ease pain and suffering. . .


    Compassionate physicians, without publicly declaring the true intention of their actions, often speed up the dying process in this way. 16 Indeed, the culture of death has deeply infiltrated the hospice and palliative care industry”!
    https://static1.squarespace.com/stat...M_June2013.pdf


    “Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending someone's life to relieve pain and suffering. Euthanasia is currently illegal in all 50 states of the United States”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthan..._United_States


    Strategies to Support Recruitment of Patients with Life-limiting illness for Research: The Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group:
    “To describe barriers and strategies for recruitment during the inaugural PCRC clinical trial.


    Five major barriers included difficulty locating eligible patients, severity of illness, family and provider protectiveness, seeking patients in multiple settings, and lack of resources for recruitment activities. Five effective recruitment strategies included systematic screening of patient lists, thoughtful messaging to make research relevant, flexible protocols to accommodate patients’ needs, support from clinical champions, and the additional resources of a trials cooperative group.


    The recruitment experience from the multi-site PCRC yields new insights into methods for effective recruitment to palliative care clinical trials. These results will inform training materials for the PCRC and may assist other investigators in the field.


    Palliative care clinical trials must enroll sufficient numbers of patients for scientific validity, yet participation is not easy for this population.4 Recruitment is a major challenge – 80% of palliative care investigators awarded funding from the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Nursing Research reported recruitment barriers, and participation rates of 50% or less are common.32,5


    Barriers to recruitment to palliative care trials are ethical and practical in nature. Patients and families become physically and emotionally vulnerable in the face of serious illness, adding potential burden, or even risk, to research”. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pm...es/PMC4241388/


    The experience of recruiting hospice patients, family members and health care professionals to a qualitative research study:


    Challenges affecting recruitment include environmental issues (moving hospice); ethical issues (amendment required); poor health status of patients and their cyclical involvement in daycare.


    Remedies include (i) dialogue with patients and staff reducing concerns about the research nurse’s potential conflict in duties; (ii) communication reducing the reluctance of staff to “over-protect” patients and allow recruitment”. https://spcare.bmj.com/content/3/Suppl_1/A31.1


    As a collective we have acknowledged that human experimentation is unethical, and performing them without consent is illegal, we implemented policies to ensure future experiments would be ethical and legal. Yet here we are seeking out subjects for studies who are the most vulnerable among us, conducting studies so horrific as to starve them to death, and note their signs of discomfort as they slowly died. We documented what made them die faster or slower, certain medications, withholding of nutrition alone or hydration. Some of these people surviving weeks while being starved to death and suffering unimaginably. These subjects did not volunteer to be starved to death, the studies clearly state the decision was made on their behalf. Upon hearing of a study like this you would think it was something out of Nazi Germany, but sadly it is happening right now under our watch.


    It is our duty to protect the vulnerable. It’s hard to imagine something so horrific could be happening during our day and age. If people only knew the truth, surely we would not stand for such injustice.


    Not only are we conducting studies on the vulnerable but we are conducting studies on ways to recruit subjects, horrifically stated in these studies are how the major barriers to recruiting is family members, over protective care takers, and emotions. Any normal person who hears this would be shocked.


    Time and time again we can read comments by nurses who administered lethal doses of medication, they always say how hard it was for them to do it, you have to wonder why they followed through with it? It seems many will do what they are told to do, even if it means taking the life of another person. What will it take for us to start thinking for ourselves, and standing down, and speak up when we are asked to do the unthinkable?


    War


    During the Obama administration the media constantly covered the subject of war, and at that time the people of Syria were going through something similar to what we currently see in Ukraine. Obama authorized 542 drone strikes killing an estimated 3,797 people, including 324 civilians. “He reportedly told senior aides in 2011: “Turns out I’m really good at killing people. Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.” https://www.cfr.org/blog/obamas-final-drone-strike-data


    Some time after Trump took office it looked as though the war was a thing of the past. The media no longer covered it, but in all actuality the war was more intense than ever before. Come to find out the reason we weren’t hearing of it on the news was that Trump was no longer complying with the Obama era Executive order to report civilian casualties. https://www.denverpost.com/2018/06/0...n-u-s-strikes/


    The Trump administration killed more civilians in their first year, than Obama’s entire 8 years in office. “Airwars estimates that civilian deaths have roughly doubled in the months since Trump took office”. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017...der-trump.html


    The Trump administration was dropping a bomb every 12 minutes, and no one was talking about it. https://www.truthdig.com/articles/tr...king-about-it/


    Trump handed military authority over to the pentagon, which lead to inadequate oversight, and less checks and balances. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/19/u...-pentagon.html


    “In May 2017, Defense Secretary James Mattis told CBS News the U.S. was accelerating and intensifying the campaign against ISIS, and added, "We have already shifted from attrition tactics ... to annihilation tactics."


    Data given to Airwars by the U.S. military's central command show the coalition launched at least 21,000 munitions — airstrikes and artillery — in the city in little over four months.


    "Entire families have been wiped out"


    “By the end of the campaign, Raqqa was a wasteland of smashed concrete; its residential tower blocks were flattened and schools and hospitals toppled. A United Nations study found that over 80 percent of the city — originally home to some 220,000 people — is damaged or destroyed.


    Many residents say they lost loved ones in the strikes”. https://www.npr.org/2018/11/09/66436...lians-in-syria




    Left to count their dead’: Striking report breaks MSM silence on plight of ‘liberated’ Raqqa: “Entire families perished in US-led strikes on Raqqa that may have claimed more civilian lives than those of ISIS, NPR said in a shocking report tilting the Western media narrative on what has become of the “liberated” city”. https://en.news-front.info/2018/11/1...berated-raqqa/




    In Yemen millions are displaced and starving to this very day. The Obama, Trump, and now Biden administration all profited off of the deaths of the people of Yemen by selling arms to Saudi Arabia, and assisting in target intelligence. The main stream media remains mostly silent on the matter. https://original.antiwar.com/liam_gl...-war-on-yemen/


    The Silent War: How the U.S. Media Failed Yemen. https://www.mironline.ca/the-silent-...-failed-yemen/


    “People in Yemen are starving to death; they are dying in hospitals, homes, and on the roadsides while fleeing to safety, due to the US-backed Saudi blockade.


    The newspaper pointed out that many severely undernourished children who make it to the safety of the overcrowded Hodeidah Hospital on the Red Sea coast still die as their bodies are so weakened with starvation”. https://en.ypagency.net/215816/


    A new phase in the fighting in Yemen: “Overnight airstrikes in Yemen have killed more than 70 people, including dozens of detained migrants and three children playing in a field, according to rights groups. If confirmed the raids would mark some of the deadliest ever for civilians in the entire seven-year war”. https://digitalnewstoday.in/?p=38737


    “On February 4, the U.S. State Department approved new proposed weapons sales to Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates”. “While officials in Washington were approving those deals, bombs were falling half a world away on Sana'a, Yemen. Jets constantly buzz over the city, with airstrikes hitting rebel areas and civilian neighborhoods alike”. https://reason.com/2022/02/17/bidens...troying-yemen/


    Main stream media remains silent: “Millions of children are frightened and starving to death in Afghanistan because of sanctions imposed upon a new government. Millions are frightened and starving in Yemen, where western arms support allows Saudi Arabia to cripple food supplies. Children in Syria are frightened and hungry as the civil war drags on. Iraq is failing and the children suffer. In Africa, starvation and fear permeate the continent in places such as Nigeria, Ethiopia, Somalia and Sudan”. https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...not-equally-so


    US Afghanistan Sanctions Are Starving 1 Million Children To Death. https://truth11.com/2022/01/28/us-af...dren-to-death/


    The U.S. Has Killed More Than 20 Million People in 37 “Victim Nations” Since World War II. Keep in mind this is data as of 2015. https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-has...war-ii/5492051




    With all of this information in mind, let us take a closer look. The events presented above seem to follow a pattern, one that was laid out long ago, and set in motion by those who shape society, the world, and the future.




    May 2018 Top White House official in charge of pandemic response exits as global health security team disbanded: “Rear Admiral Timothy Ziemer's sudden departure means that no senior administration official is now focused solely on global health security as his team is broken up at a time when many experts say the US is underprepared for a potential pandemic or bioterrorism attack”.


    “His exit comes against the backdrop of other administration actions that critics say have weakened health security preparedness, including dwindling financing for early preventive action against infectious disease threats abroad”. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8346346.html


    In September of 2019 just months before the Coronavirus outbreak in China the Trump administration cut the pandemic early warning program. https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...re-coronavirus


    Event 201: "The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering. The Event 201 pandemic exercise, conducted on October 18, 2019, vividly demonstrated a number of these important gaps in pandemic preparedness as well as some of the elements of the solutions between the public and private sectors that will be needed to fill them. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly propose these recommendations”. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about


    Major players:
    Bill Gates
    John Hopkins
    World Economic forum
    World Health Organization


    Exercise highlights:

    https://youtu.be/LBuP40H4Tko
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Just AnotherPerson For This Useful Post:

    Collateral Damage (06-29-2022)

  11. #6
    Points: 84,798, Level: 70
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 52
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    27584
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    11,128
    Points
    84,798
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    14,094
    Thanked 9,553x in 5,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    3 of 13

    2017 Trump’s Foreign Food Aid Cuts Questioned in Washington: “The proposed budget cuts would slash programs that provide meals to hungry children abroad”.


    “Cutting foreign food aid might seem like a simple way to put “America first,” but as many of those testifying before a House agricultural panel pointed out yesterday, the notion that a Trump administration plan to ax two longstanding aid programs will be beneficial to the US may not be so cut and dry”.


    “Among the many cuts President Trump’s spending plan proposes, two food aid programs would see their funding eliminated entirely: the Food for Peace program, originally launched in 1954 under President Dwight Eisenhower, and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program, implemented in 2003 while President George W. Bush was in office”.


    “Former senator, Republican presidential candidate and program namesake Bob Dole ardently defended the McGovern-Dole program earlier this year, pointing out how it has provided food to more than 40 million children. “Eliminating the McGovern-Dole program would have a disastrous effect on the planet’s most vulnerable children”. https://www.foodandwine.com/news/tru...-food-aid-cuts


    Manufacturing a Crisis


    The Coronavirus lock downs soon lead to worldwide food shortages. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/coron...060448971.html


    Lines stretched for miles at food banks as Americans struggled to survive. https://khn.org/morning-breakout/foo...onomic-crisis/


    Food prices began to skyrocket as shelves in stores went bare. https://www.abcactionnews.com/news/r...s-supply-chain


    While Americans were hungry, and the whole world faced food shortages farmers were busy destroying food. They were breaking eggs, dumping milk, and tilling crops back into the fields. https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...d-supply-waste


    Farm animals were culled, slaughtered by the millions. https://www.theguardian.com/environm...up-coronavirus


    While citizens in the US struggled to survive and provide food for their families, those in third world nations faced famine, starvation, and death. Third world nations depend largely on the rest of the world for their survival. The trickle down effect was devastating. https://www.indiatimes.com/news/worl...rt-517535.html


    In all reality, there were no “food shortages”, the food was being destroyed deliberately. The result being mass death and starvation in third world nations. It’s hard to fathom how we seemingly followed along without question.


    Manufacturing a Crisis & Suppressing the Cure




    Dr. Pierre Kory: ‘COVID-19 Is Highly Treatable’: “New York pulmonologist Dr. Pierre Kory, an unapologetic champion of evidence-based medicine, has had remarkable success treating patients with ivermectin and other therapies during the pandemic. His efforts to get the word out on this treatment protocol as part of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group (FLCCC) have largely been stifled by censorship”.


    “On December 8, 2020, Kory testified to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which held a hearing on “Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution.”


    “He called on the NIH, CDC and FDA to review the expansive data on ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, keep those with early symptoms from progressing and help critically ill patients recover. As he told Martenson, due to their promising results, he believed early on that “the pandemic has been solved,” until he realized that those in power weren’t open to hearing what he had to say”.


    “Despite his impassioned pleas and astonishing science to back them up, the treatment not only was ignored by the Senate committee but promptly eviscerated”. https://peterlegyel.wordpress.com/20...hly-treatable/




    “Dr. Paul Marik—the world-renowned critical care doctor, with peerless medical and academic credentials. He is America’s most highly published critical care physician; and the second most published physician in his specialty in the world. His papers in dozens of medical journals have been cited tens of thousands of times. The medical books and book chapters he has authored are used to teach medical students around the world”. https://flccc.substack.com/p/the-aca...-a-tenured?s=r


    Testimony before the House Health, Human Services, and Elderly Affairs Committee: “Dr. Marik then compared Ivermectin to Remdesivir (the EUA drug that is pushed on Covid patients in hospitals). There is no comparison…


    “The cost of Remdesivir: $3,000 a shot. Ivermectin: pennies.


    “Remdesivir increases the risk of dying by 4%. This is used throughout the entire country as first line therapy for hospitalized patients. It increases the risk of death by 4%, and what is most outrageous is the federal government gives hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill for medicare patients if they prescribe Remdesivir”.


    “It is disturbing that our federal government is financially incentivizing the use of an experimental treatment that increases the risk of dying”.
    Ivermectin reduces the risk by 50%”. https://www.theburningplatform.com/2...-prescription/


    “Dr. Mary Bowden of Houston Methodist Hospital has been suspended. Dr. Bowden is not guilty of any improper conduct at the hospital. She hasn't fudged her bills or committed malpractice. She has complied with the hospital's vaccine mandate and treated her patients in accordance with accepted medical protocols”.


    “Dr. Bowden's offense is what George Orwell called a "thoughtcrime" in his dystopian novel 1984. Dr. Bowden had the audacity to tweet thoughts about vaccine mandates and ivermectin on her private Twitter account. She praised ivermectin as a treatment for COVID and said vaccine mandates were wrong”. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...out_covid.html


    “Still, "Dr. Bowden, who has never admitted a patient at Houston Methodist Hospital, is spreading dangerous misinformation which is not based in science," the hospital tweeted”.


    “CNN notes that a "small group" of doctors like Bowden have been "a huge source" of misinformation and conspiracy theories, with one Northeastern University professor saying that "these doctors are taking advantage of the trust in them." Mitby, meanwhile, has released a statement on Bowden, who "has treated more than 2,000 patients with COVID-19, many with co-morbidities, and has yet to have one of her patients end up in the hospital," per KTRK. He adds that "her early treatment methods work and are saving lives". https://www.newser.com/story/313392/...ful-posts.html


    “Dr. Peter McCullough: The standard of care for COVID-19 has been to withhold treatment until a person is sick enough to be hospitalized. It typically takes two to three weeks for someone with COVID-19 to get sick enough to be hospitalized, and during that time early treatment can be lifesaving”.


    “The rationale was that there have been no large, randomized trials conducted to know which treatments are safe and effective, but as McCullough said, “We can’t wait for large randomized trials … Something got in the minds of doctors and nurses and everyone to not treat COVID-19. I couldn’t stand it.” He and colleagues worked feverishly to figure out a treatment — why didn’t national health organizations do so also”?


    “Our government and other governments, and the entire world, has not lifted a finger to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death anywhere,” McCullough said, pointing out the irony: “If there was a kid with asthma, would we let the kid wheeze and choke for two weeks before the kid has to go to the hospital? No, we give the child medications. We don’t have randomized trials for every single thing that we do.”


    “Around the world, the unthinkable is happening: Doctors are being threatened with loss of their license or even prison for trying to help their patients”.


    “While some physician organizations have stepped up and are treating COVID-19 patients, “The ivory tower today still is not treating patients. The party line in my health system is, do not treat a COVID-19 patient as an outpatient. Wait for them to get sick enough to be admitted. Because my health system … follows the National Institutes of Health or the Centers for Disease Control, period”. https://thetruthiswhere.wordpress.co...vid-treatment/


    “hospitals across the United States are dangerously adhering to new Covid protocols that are a death sentence for Covid-infected in-patients, McCullough warns”:


    “Right now when patients are receiving outpatient care, they come into the hospital — there is the cessation of care”.


    “The hospitals have clearly locked themselves into protocols”.


    “Covid-positive patients are typically provided Remdesiver, a drug that prevents Covid transmission but injures the kidney and liver, in hospitals. As the patient’s health declines, doctors in adherence with the new emergency Covid regulations then subject those they are responsible for curing to endotracheal intubation, a procedure that will likely kill them”.


    “They are given a very meager dose of a glucose cortercoid, which is Dethamethasone, and then get Remdesivir, which is far too late,” Dr. McCullough said. “Remdesivir — its only hope is given very early against viral replications”. https://dcweekly.org/2022/01/24/exclusive-dr-peter-mccullough-urges-public-against-genetic-vaccines-that-cause-body-to-produce-spike-proteins-in-the-brain-lung-the-heart-bone-marrow-reproductive-org/


    Remdesivir and Acute Renal Failure: “A Potential Safety Signal, The combination of the terms "acute renal failure" and "remdesivir" yielded a statistically significant disproportionality signal with 138 observed cases instead of the 9 expected. We detected a statistically significant pharmacovigilance signal of nephrotoxicity associated with remdesivir”. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33340409/


    “Research shows remdesivir treatment for COVID-19 has little impact on survival, increases hospital stay: “A new study finds that remdesivir, the first new medicine approved for treatment of COVID-19, is not associated with improved survival, but is associated with longer hospital stays for patients”. https://medicine.uiowa.edu/content/r...eases-hospital


    Remdesivir a reproductive toxin: “A preliminary study on the reproductive toxicity of GS-5734 on male mice. Our findings suggest that a high dosage of GS-5734 may induce testicular toxicity and result in deterioration of sperm parameters in mice”. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...kRfC1XuFcGp-8A


    The Strange Story Of Remdesivir, A Covid Drug That Doesn’t Work: “Remdesivir is an experimental drug developed by biotech company Gilead Sciences (under the brand name Veklury) in collaboration with the US Centers for Disease Control and Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases”.


    “What's weird about remdesivir is that it hasn't been held to the same standards as other drug candidates”.


    “Normally, a drug is only approved for use by a regulatory body like the US Food and Drug Administration if it meets the two criteria for safety and efficacy. Nonetheless, in October 2020, remdesivir was granted approval by FDA based on promising data from relatively small trials with about 1000 participants”.


    “Based on interim results from studying more than 5000 participants, the international study concluded that remdesivir "had little or no effect on hospitalized patients with Covid-19, as indicated by overall mortality, initiation of ventilation, and duration of hospital stay”. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jvchama...h=68d2b2e866c2


    Hydroxychloroquine has been used safely for over 60years, when given at normal dosing levels. During the hydroxychloroquine trials the WHO directed the dosing to be changed to toxic, in many cases lethal levels. Many died during these trials. Not only that in 1979 the WHO had conducted a specific study exploring the toxicity of chloroquine as you will see below, they were fully aware that the dose was toxic, and lethal. This cannot be considered as unintentional.


    WHO and UK trials use potentially lethal hydroxychloroquine dose--according to WHO consultant:


    “What is a toxic dose? All experts agree on this: "... chloroquine has a small toxic to therapeutic margin," according to Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. The drug is very safe when used correctly, but not a lot more can potentially kill. Prof. Nicholas White, a Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellow and expert in malaria treatment, who attended both WHO consultations on the chloroquines, has confirmed this. Careful monitoring of electrolyte levels and an EKG can prevent most problems”.


    “The WHO hired a consultant to explore the toxicity of chloroquine in 1979. The consultant, H. Weniger, looked at 335 episodes of adult poisoning by chloroquine drugs. Weniger on page 5 notes that a single dose of 1.5-2 grams of chloroquine base "may be fatal."


    “According to Browning and Goldfrank, the pharmacokinetics and potency of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are almost identical, while the maximum used chronic dose of chloroquine is 3.5 mg/kg”.


    “The Recovery trial used 1.86 grams hydroxychloroquine base (equal to 2400 mg of hydroxychloroquine) in the first 24 hours for treatment of already very ill, hospitalized Covid-19 patients. The Canadian and Norwegian Solidarity trials used 2,000 mg of HCQ, or 1.55 grams of HCQ base in the first 24 hours. Each trial gave patients a cumulative dose during the first 24 hours that, when given as a single dose, has been documented to be lethal. (The drug's half-life is about a month, so the cumulative amount is important.)”.


    “The doses used in these trials are not recommended for therapy of any medical condition, which I confirmed with Goodman and Gilman's Pharmacology textbook, the drug's US label, and the online subscription medical encyclopedia UptoDate”.


    “Excessive, dangerous HCQ dosing continues to be used in WHO's Solidarity trials”. http://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2...lly-fatal.html


    Is Lifesaving Medicine Withheld to Ensure Profits?


    “What possessed the study designers and investigators of these three huge clinical trials to use such exaggerated dosages? Hydroxychloroquine has been on the market for 65 years and both toxic and the effective dosages for a variety of ailments are well documented. Doctors who have reported excellent treatment results in the field stayed within the recommended hydroxychloroquine dosages”.


    “Were they trying to purposely sabotage these trials using dosages known to be toxic? Doctors have also reported that best results are observed when the drug is administered early, while symptoms are still mild or moderate, yet in these trials the drug was not given until it was too late”.


    “A July 1, 2020, retrospective analysis41,42,43 of 2,541 patients in the Henry Ford Hospital System in Detroit, Michigan, found use of hydroxychloroquine alone cut mortality by more than half, from 26.4% to 13.5%. (Hydroxychloroquine in combination with azithromycin had a mortality rate of 20.1%, and azithromycin alone had a mortality rate of 22.4%.)”.


    “More than 90% of the patients had received the drug or drugs within 48 hours of admission into the hospital. No adverse heart-related events were observed among those given hydroxychloroquine”.


    “All three trials that used toxic hydroxychloroquine doses — Recovery, Solidarity and REMAP — also failed to include zinc, which appears to be a key factor. As noted by Zelenko above, the hydroxychloroquine is really only used to drive the zinc in to the cells”. https://www.citizensjournal.us/how-a...e-was-created/


    “Death rates in countries that rely on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for the treatment of Covid-19 appear to be dramatically lower than death rates in countries that discourage the use of the drug. A new study claims that the death rate in the countries that used HCQ early on was 79% lower than in countries where the drug was not used”. https://fcpp.org/2020/11/08/hydroxyc...und-the-globe/


    “Ventilators are killing covid patients: “I did some research and found some startling findings –


    The first is a NYC study done in 2020 that shows patients that were put on ventilators died at a significantly higher rate”.


    “Of patients receiving mechanical ventilation and whose outcomes (discharge or death) were known, 88.1% died. When stratified by age, the mortality rates for ventilated patients were 76.4% for those aged 18-65 years and 97.2% for those older than 65 years”.


    “Among those who did not require mechanical ventilation and whose outcomes (discharge or death) were known, 19.8% of patients aged 18-65 years died, as did 26.6% of those older than 65 years”. https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/...ovid-patients/




    Study: Most N.Y. COVID Patients on Ventilators Died: “April 22, 2020 (HealthDay News) -- The largest analysis of hospitalized U.S. COVID-19 patients to date finds that most did not survive after being placed on a mechanical ventilator”.


    “The study included the health records of 5,700 COVID-19 patients hospitalized between March 1 and April 4 at facilities overseen by Northwell Health, New York State's largest health system”.


    “Among the 2,634 patients for whom outcomes were known, the overall death rate was 21%, but it rose to 88% for those who received mechanical ventilation”. https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/2020...-study-shows#1


    Covid death rates dropped as doctors rejected ventilators: “Death rates among seriously ill Covid-19 patients dropped sharply as doctors rejected the use of mechanical ventilators, analysis has found”.
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...tmsource=email




    Did care homes use powerful sedatives to speed Covid deaths?:


    “The number of prescriptions for a powerful sedative that can kill the frail doubled at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, raising fears it was used to control elderly residents in stretched care homes – or even to hasten their deaths”.


    “Official figures show out-of-hospital prescribing of the drug midazolam increased by more than 100 per cent in April compared to previous months”.


    “An anti-euthanasia campaigner last night said he suspected that the spike was evidence that many people had been put on end-of-life protocols or ‘pathways’.”.


    “Midazolam depresses respiration and it hastens death. It changes end-of-life care into euthanasia”.


    “Prof Pullicino also claims that an official flow-chart intended to help health workers decide if people sick with Covid-19 were suitable for intensive care wrongly consigned those deemed too frail to end-of-life care”.


    “That meant, he suggested, that some were not taken to hospital even though they could have been helped by doing so”.


    “Midazolam is similar to diazepam – better known as Valium – but twice as powerful. It reduces anxiety, relaxes muscles and, if enough is given, provides ‘total sedation’ for dying patients in extreme pain or distress”.


    “On its own and if used with painkilling opiates, it can depress breathing, which is potentially fatal”. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-pandemic.html




    Deadly COVID Discrimination against the Elderly in Sweden:


    “State epidemiologist Anders Tegnell speaks at a daily news conference on the coronavirus situation in Stockholm, Sweden, June 8, 2020”. (Andres Wiklund/via Reuters)


    “We have seen how the most vulnerable to death from COVID have been abused in this country with, for example, New York and other states’ ordering infected COVID patients to be admitted to nursing homes, spreading the disease”.


    “But this is even more awful. Reports out of Sweden say that elderly COVID patients there were not only denied life-sustaining treatment at hospitals, but in some cases, were pushed over the edge into death in nursing homes”.


    “The health authorities have received many complaints about how elderly relatives were treated. A consistent theme is that nursing home residents with suspected Covid-19 were immediately placed on palliative care and given morphine and denied supplementary oxygen and intravenous fluids and nutrition. For many this was effectively a death sentence”.


    “People suffocated, it was horrible to watch. One patient asked me what I was giving him when I gave him the morphine injection, and I lied to him,” said Latifa Löfvenberg, a nurse. “Many died before their time. It was very, very difficult.”


    “Older people are routinely being given morphine and midazolam, which are respiratory-inhibiting,” he told the Svenska Dagbladet newspaper, “It’s active euthanasia, to say the least.” https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...rly-in-sweden/


    March 2022 'Significant increase' in opioids dispensed to Ontario long-term care homes during COVID-19: Study: “A new study of opioids in some long-term care homes in Ontario found there was a "statistically significant increase" in the medication being dispensed during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic”.


    “But, the researchers note, the study doesn't answer why dispensations were up and it's far too early to conclude that opioid use in long-term care facilities is problematic”.


    “Maxwell noted there could be legitimate reasons more opioids were dispensed, including that more people were feeling pain, there may have been more fractures or there may have been more need to use them for palliative care”.


    "Opioids are commonly prescribed for use at end of life. There was increased illness and dying caused by COVID in nursing homes in wave one and two and ordering more medications, including opioids, would be part of a care plan." https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canad...udy/ar-AAUVVw7




    “New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s controversial early pandemic policy forcing nursing homes to accept COVID-19-positive patients continues to draw scrutiny”.


    “A new report from the nonpartisan New York think tank the Empire Center found that Cuomo’s policy is correlated with higher nursing home death rates”.


    “The admission of coronavirus-positive patients into New York nursing homes under March 25 guidance from the New York State Department of Health was associated with a statistically significant increase in resident deaths,” the report found”.


    “The governor was warned by trade industry leaders and health experts that his policy carried the seeds of disaster”.


    “We are deeply concerned with the recent New York State order,” the American Health Care Association and the National Center for Assisted Living said in a joint statement when Cuomo issued his order over their objections. “Based on what we currently know about how this virus can spread in institutional settings, the hospitalizations and case fatality rate, this action by a state will put the many frail and older adults who reside in nursing homes at risk.”


    “Weeks later, at an April 23 press conference, Cuomo was asked about objections over his policy, which some warned was resulting in excess deaths in nursing homes”.


    “They don’t have the right to object,” Cuomo answered before the reporter finished his question. “That is the rule, and that is the regulation, and they have to comply with it.” https://thelibertarianrepublic.com/c...s-study-finds/


    “Three states hit hard by the pandemic — New York, New Jersey and California — have ordered nursing homes and other long-term care facilities to accept coronavirus patients discharged from hospitals”. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ients-n1191811


    To this day as recent as January 2022, states are still placing covid patients in nursing homes, a practice proven to cause mass death and suffering.


    January 2022 Connecticut’s absurd COVID order endangers nursing home patients — again: “Administrators of Connecticut’s 209 nursing homes and long-term care facilities were stunned at the start of this year when the state’s Department of Public Health (DPH) told them they must start accepting patients infected with COVID-19 to relieve pressure on overflowing hospitals”.


    “It was like déjà vu all over again for those who worked in nursing homes during the early days of the pandemic, when deaths from COVID in states like Connecticut, New York and New Jersey were highly concentrated in elderly care facilities”.


    “Despite being one of the most vaccinated groups, people over the age of 65 account for three-quarters of the total deaths from COVID. A combination of close quarters and patients with compromised immune systems made the virus spread like wildfire through nursing homes”. https://nypost.com/2022/02/12/connec...d-order-again/


    A little bit of perspective: We were told it was necessary to isolate the elderly in care homes for their own protection so they wouldn’t be exposed to the virus. We were told we were a danger to them, it was for their safety, because of this many of them died alone, and afraid. Yet at the same time we were filling these care homes with patients infected with Coronavirus, causing what appears to be the deliberate spread of the virus. Rather than protect them, it seems we enabled unhindered abuse. If they are deliberately allowing infected patients into the facility, then clearly covid exposure is not the reason for their isolation.


    “Oregon Hospitals Didn't Have Shortages. So Why Were Disabled People Denied Care?: At the start of the coronavirus pandemic, a small group of disability rights advocates found itself in a race against time to save the life of a woman with an intellectual disability”.


    “The woman was taken to the hospital with COVID-19. But the hospital, in a small Oregon town, denied the ventilator she needed. Instead, a doctor, citing her "low quality of life," wanted her to sign a legal form to allow the hospital to deny her care”.


    “It was late March when the woman with an intellectual disability contracted COVID-19. She struggled to breathe”.


    “In the hospital, a medical provider wrote do-not-resuscitate (DNR) and do-not-intubate orders for the woman. Those are medical instructions to health care providers to withhold potentially painful interventions, like a ventilator or CPR, if a patient stops breathing or the patient's heart stops. The woman was alone in the hospital and did not understand what the doctor and medical staff wanted her to agree to”.


    “In addition, the hospital staff sent word to the woman's group home: Fill out DNRs in advance for your other residents, in case one of them comes to the hospital”.


    “People who worked with the woman were angry that the doctor and the hospital seemed to be discounting the lives of people with disabilities. Someone tracked down lawyers for help”. https://www.npr.org/2020/12/21/94629...le-denied-care




    When looking at the totality, it seems only medications that cause death and suffering were allowed to treat covid, any medications or supplements that seemed to save lives were attacked, and doctors who prescribed them, punished. Meanwhile, Congress and their families were said to be taking the very life saving drugs that they were preventing the rest of us from having access to.


    Dr. Pierre Kory: “Fun fact: Between 100-200 United States Congress Members (plus many of their staffers & family members) with COVID.. were treated by a colleague over the past 15 months with ivermectin & the I-MASK+ protocol at http://flccc.net. None have gone to hospital. Just sayin'.”. https://twoplustwoequalsfournews.wor...tin-for-covid/


    In India at one point the pandemic got so bad they were burning bodies in the streets. The high court in India approved the use of Ivermectin based on a scientific review. The WHO tried to interfere and discourage doctors from prescribing it. The Indian Bar association served members of the WHO with crimes against humanity, and contempt of court. https://indianbarassociation.in/legal-notice-for-contempt-of-court-against-dr-tedros-adhanom-ghebreyesus-dr-soumya-swaminathan-and-the-directorate-general-of-health-services-dghs/
    Some states decided to follow the the advice of the WHO, in those states the death rates continued to skyrocket. While at the same time other states such as Uttar Pradesh decided to use Ivermectin, and follow the scientific advice presented by the high court, in those states Covid was brought to an end. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...sharingbuttons




    At one point the WHO said, they would do an in-depth study to consider Ivermectin for the treatment of covid. They did follow through with the study, only it didn't appear to be a study to consider the use, but rather seemed designed to discredit the drug. They threw out trials proving it’s efficacy, and only used a small handful of trials to come to a decision determining that Ivermectin should not be used for Covid outside of a trial. They passed the verdict without a vote, saying a vote wasn’t necessary. https://trialsitenews.com/who-reache...ithout-a-vote/


    Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance Statement on Weak Guidance on Ivermectin from
    the World Health Organization (WHO):


    “The latest guidance from the WHO is out of alignment with many national and local health
    authorities around the world where ivermectin has been proven to prevent and treat COVID-19.
    These countries include, Bulgaria, Slovakia, India, Egypt, Peru, Zimbabwe, and Bolivia, and in
    several regions a growing number of health authorities have advocated for, or adopted
    ivermectin across Japan, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, and South Africa and it is now the standard of
    care in Mexico City.


    “I am deeply troubled that the WHO made this hasty decision on guidance before reviewing all
    available data,” said Pierre Kory, MD, MPH, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC.
    “Their recommendation ignores the evidence, creates more controversy, and will only lead to
    continuing suffering and death from COVID-19. There are now over 24 randomized trials results
    that have been reported to the Unitaid/WHO team yet todays guidance was inexcusably based on
    a faulty analysis of just 16 of the available trials. Further, these erroneous findings directly conflict
    with numerous other peer-reviewed expert analyses that have found the data overwhelmingly
    demonstrates that ivermectin saves lives from COVID-19. There is no reason not to recommend it
    for everyone as a safe drug for prevention and treatment.” https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-c...ch-31-2021.pdf




    World’s Leading ICU Doctor Files Lawsuit Against Hospital System After Being Barred from Administering Safe and Effective COVID-19 Treatments:


    “WASHINGTON, D.C. – Paul Marik, MD, one of the most highly published critical care
    physicians in the world and the Director of the ICU at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, was
    recently told by Sentara Healthcare that he could no longer administer a range of highly effective
    COVID-19 treatments to critically ill patients—the same treatments he has successfully used to
    reduce COVID deaths in the ICU by as much as 50%. The result of the prohibition has been a
    sharp increase in patient mortality.


    “Sentara is violating the law and unjustly depriving critically ill patients of lifesaving treatment”.
    “This case is about doctors, having the ability to honor their Hippocratic Oath, to follow
    evidence-based medicine, and to treat our patients the best we know how. Corporations and
    faceless bureaucrats should not be allowed to interfere with doctor-patient decisions, especially
    when it can result in harm or death." according to Paul Marik, MD, chief, Division of Pulmonary
    & Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, who practices in the Sentara
    Norfolk General Hospital. “I refuse to watch another patient die from COVID-19 knowing that I
    was not allowed to give them proven treatments that could have saved their life.”


    The MATH+ protocol has been used all over the world to effectively treat patients with COVID-
    19. It is generally well-tolerated with no reports of adverse medical events.


    “The FLCCC stands behind Paul 100%,” said Dr. Kory. “We take an oath as doctors to do no
    harm. I can’t think of a way of doing more harm to a patient than to not administer a treatment
    that you know can help them. No doctor should be forced to watch their patient die knowing that
    more could have been done to save them and that is exactly what Sentara is doing.” https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-c...INAL-Nov-9.pdf




    Florida doctor claims he's treated 3,000 COVID-19 patients with Ivermectin:


    Dr John Littell, “The bottom line is hospitals are not allowing us to provide optimal care”. Congressman Neil Dunn, “There's in excess of 30 studies in the literature, 20 of them randomized control studies prospective studies that show benefit with Ivermectin. So to say that there's no evidence for this drug at this point is to willfully, willfully just be ignorant of the true literature”. https://news.yahoo.com/florida-docto...152401758.html


    As mentioned earlier, hospitals are receiving a 20% bonus for prescribing the known toxic drug Remdesivir to medicare patients, there is another one included on the bonus list, and that is the novel drug Molnupiravir. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/covid-1...-payment-nctap


    NIH-COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines


    “Molnupiravir is the oral prodrug of beta-D-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC), a ribonucleoside that has broad antiviral activity against RNA viruses. NHC uptake by viral RNA-dependent RNA-polymerases results in viral mutations and lethal mutagenesis.


    Molnupiravir has potent antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2.1,5 As a mutagenic ribonucleoside antiviral agent, there is a theoretical risk that molnupiravir will be metabolized by the human host cell and incorporated into the host DNA, leading to mutations. Molnupiravir has been evaluated in 2 in vivo rodent mutagenicity assays. One study produced equivocal results”. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin.../molnupiravir/


    “Molnupiravir’s efficacy is marginal at best, but its mutagenicity and carcinogenicity are real. The tidbits of information published by the UK’s MHRA include bone marrow toxicity, suggesting leukemia potential.


    Molnupiravir damages bone marrow just when it is needed most – to produce B-cells producing antibodies against SARS-COV-2. These facts are grounds for a strongly worded rejection of Molnupiravir”. file:///tmp/mozilla_alien0/FDA-2021-N-0758-0021_attachment_1.pdf


    Molnupiravir and fertility


    Fact Sheet for Patients And Caregivers Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Of Molnupiravir For Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)


    “What is the most important information I should know about molnupiravir? Molnupiravir may cause serious side effects, including:


    Molnupiravir may cause harm to your unborn baby. It is not known if molnupiravir will harm your baby if you take molnupiravir during pregnancy. Molnupiravir is not recommended for use in pregnancy. Molnupiravir has not been studied in pregnancy. Molnupiravir was studied in pregnant animals only.


    When molnupiravir was given to pregnant animals, molnupiravir caused harm to their unborn babies.


    For individuals who are able to become pregnant: You should use a reliable method of birth control (contraception) consistently and correctly.


    Pregnancy Surveillance Program:
    There is a pregnancy surveillance program for individuals who take molnupiravir during pregnancy. The purpose of this program is to collect information about the health of you and your baby.


    For individuals who are sexually active with partners who are able to become pregnant:
    It is not known if molnupiravir can affect sperm. While the risk is regarded as low, animal studies to fully assess the potential for molnupiravir to affect the babies of males treated with molnupiravir have not been completed. A reliable method of birth control (contraception) should be used consistently and correctly during treatment with molnupiravir and for at least 3 months after the last dose. The risk to sperm beyond 3 months is not known. Studies to understand the risk to sperm beyond 3 months are ongoing”. https://cacmap.fda.gov/media/155055/download




    While proven safe drugs like Ivermectin are rejected, deadly medications are approved with little evidence of efficay and incomplete trials, bonuses given for prescribing them. These medications cause cancer, infertility, birth defects, liver toxicity, and death. Yet, they were approved for emergency use. Ivermectin has been proven safe in study after study, and still we are told it cannot be approved because we don’t know if it’s safe, that argument falls flat. Just like actions, evidence speaks louder than words.


    To those of us who know, it’s just the same ol’ song and dance, just as the FDA did to Dr. Burzynski when he found a cure for cancer way back in the 70’s, they worked relentlessly to shut down Ivermectin even though countless lives were saved and several nations had successfully halted Covid in it’s tracks using the drug. Once again like clockwork, the FDA working to keep life saving drugs from seeing the light. https://www.aier.org/article/the-fda...on-ivermectin/


    Perhaps saving lives isn’t the goal, and a greater agenda is at play. What will it take for us to believe what we see with our eyes?


    Looking at the totality of events it seems clear the stage for disaster was set in motion. Artificial food shortages were created, at every turn the pandemic was reignited, death was hastened, life saving treatments were withheld and suppressed, deadly drugs were backed by bonuses, the end result was mass death and fear, exposure to these events were breaking the minds of society. This total collapse of reality opened the door to the end of freedom & totalitarian rule, the ushering in of a long awaited agenda.


    We were told a vaccine was coming that would save us all. What we didn’t know at the time was that Moderna one of our vaccine saviors, had already patented the DNA for covid in 2016, 3 years before the pandemic ever broke.
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  12. #7
    Points: 84,798, Level: 70
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 52
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    27584
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    11,128
    Points
    84,798
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    14,094
    Thanked 9,553x in 5,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    4 of 13

    “A team of international researchers, including from India, have found that the COVID-19 virus' contains a tiny chunk of DNA that matched the sequence patented by Moderna three years before the onset of the pandemic.


    The findings, published in Frontiers in Virology, has raised new suspicion that the COVID-19 virus may have been tinkered within a lab, Daily Mail reported.


    The scientists' team, including Akhil Varshney from Dr Shroff Charity Eye Hospital in New Delhi, showed a tiny snippet of a genetic material owned by Moderna in the virus's spike protein.


    But records show that Moderna had filed the patent in February 2016 as part of its cancer research division, the report said”. https://weather.com/en-IN/india/coro...atent-filed-in


    In 2017 Trump deregulated the FDA, paving the way for faster drug approvals. Had he not taken these early steps in his presidency the vaccination campaign could have never moved forward in the way it did. While Trump was moving forward with operation warp speed to bring us the vaccine the main stream media was criticizing the fact that he deregulated the FDA and was potentially bringing us a dangerous novel vaccine. Those articles are no longer easy to find with the current censorship regarding anything negative about the vaccines, even though it was they who had said it.


    “Letters to the Editor: Polio-era epidemiologist warns: Trump’s ‘warp speed’ vaccine effort may be dangerous”. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/stor...-can-be-deadly


    “Democrats are very suspicious of President Donald Trump’s big promises to develop and bring to market a vaccine for the coronavirus before the end of the year.


    They fear the president and his political appointees at the Department of Health and Human Services will pressure scientists, regulators and drugmakers into releasing an insufficiently safe or effective vaccine in order to help bolster Trump’s reelection chances in November”. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/coron...b65fd7b8550ef9


    (2017) “Trump met the CEOs of several big pharmaceutical companies Tuesday and promised to cut FDA regulation, making it easier to get drugs approved”.


    "We’re going to streamline the FDA," Trump said”. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...dy-did-n715481


    (2017) “CEO of Pfizer favors deregulation


    The high cost of obtaining approval for a new drug, estimated at $2.6 billion, has been blamed for hindering pharmaceutical start-ups from entering the market. As a result, certain pharmaceutical executives, like the CEO of Pfizer Inc., have publicly favored deregulation, claiming it will help create more competition and lower drug prices”. https://thenationaltriallawyers.org/...regulated-fda/


    “Since the election, pharmaceutical companies have been asking for someone that will reduce regulations while also maintaining some semblance of objectivity. They detailed their wishes to President Trump in a closed-door meeting last month.


    President Trump must have listened, as he tabbed Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who sits on boards for several pharmaceutical giants like GlaxoSmithKline, to head the FDA. Dr. Gottlieb has an extensive record of being pro-pharma, testifying often in front of Congress on drug pricing and other health matters. But he also advocates for lower cost drugs, often favoring smaller companies over their larger competitors when it comes to generic approval. Gottlieb was chosen over Jim O’Neill who had favored fast tracking drugs for approval even before they were proven to work. Dr. Gottlieb has drawn praise from former FDA officials under both Bush and Obama”. https://trofire.com/2017/03/14/big-p...ch-good-thing/






    The United States and China had been working together to ensure pandemic preparedness.


    "U.S.-China collaboration on the Global Virome Project is an opportunity to lead innovation in science, collaborate with China, and potentially contribute to scientific breakthroughs," said the summary of the Global Virome Project in the email that was part of 92 pages obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit with the National Institutes of Health.


    The documents show that cooperation would include efforts in the coming years, such as U.S. government scientists providing training for Wuhan lab scientists in 2018. A key selling point was such a partnership would mean "pandemic preparedness" and "enable rapid detection" of viruses to prevent outbreaks”. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-...ness-documents


    It’s common to hear media reports regarding Fauci and gain of function research, and shady Eco Health Alliance dealings.


    “Dr. Anthony Fauci stood by his denial that the National Institutes of Health had funded risky gain-of-function research, despite the NIH admitting EcoHealth Alliance had violated grant rules when conducting bat coronavirus research”. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...tion-wuhan-lab


    Little attention was paid to other mysterious events that occurred in the year and months prior to the coronavirus outbreak. There were several arrests, and possible espionage scandals regarding level 4 bio labs connected to the Institute of Virology in Wuhan.


    “On June 13, 2012 a 60-year-old Saudi man was admitted to a private hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, with a 7-day history of fever, cough, expectoration, and shortness of breath. He had no history of cardiopulmonary or renal disease, was receiving no long-term medications, and did not smoke. Egyptian virologist Dr. Ali Mohamed Zaki isolated and identified a previously unknown coronavirus from his lungs. After routine diagnostics failed to identify the causative agent, Zaki contacted Ron Fouchier, a leading virologist at the Erasmus Medical Center (EMC) in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, for advice.


    Fouchier sequenced the virus from a sample sent by Zaki. Fouchier used a broad-spectrum 'pan-coronavirus” real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method to test for distinguishing features of a number of known coronaviruses known to infect humans. This coronavirus sample was acquired by Scientific Director Dr. Frank Plummer of Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg directly from Fouchier, who received it from Zaki. This virus was reportedly stolen from the Canadian lab by Chinese agents.


    In March 2019, in mysterious event a shipment of exceptionally virulent viruses from Canada’s NML ended up in China. The event caused a major scandal with Bio-warfare experts questioning why Canada was sending lethal viruses to China. Scientists from NML said the highly lethal viruses were a potential bio-weapon. Following investigation, the incident was traced to Chinese agents working at NML. Four months later in July 2019, a group of Chinese virologists were forcibly dispatched from the Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory (NML). The NML is Canada’s only level-4 facility and one of only a few in North America equipped to handle the world’s deadliest diseases, including Ebola, SARS, Coronavirus, etc”. https://www.theweek.in/news/world/20...espionage.html


    February 04 2020: “In a very strage turn of events, renowned scientist Frank Plummer who received Saudi SARS Coronavirus sample and was working on Coronavirus (HIV) vaccine in the Winnipeg based Canadian lab from where the virus was smuggled by Chinese Biowarfare agents and weaponized as revealed in GreatGameIndia investigation, has died in mysterious conditions. Frank Plummer was the key to the Chinese Biological Espionage case at Winnipeg’s National Microbiology Laboratory.




    According to CBC, Plummer, 67, was in Kenya, where he was a keynote speaker at the annual meeting of the University of Nairobi’s collaborative centre for research and training in HIV/AIDS/STIs.


    Dr. Larry Gelmon, who helped set up that meeting, said Plummer collapsed and was taken to hospital in Nairobi, where he was pronounced dead on arrival.


    No confirmed cause of death has yet been released”. https://greatgameindia.com/frank-plu...-assassinated/


    It was later concluded he had suffered a heart attack.


    “Dr Digvir Jayas, of the University of Manitoba, said Dr Plummer's "contributions have had a cumulative global impact on saving the lives of tens of thousands of people for decades and also improving the lives of HIV-positive people around the world".


    Among his findings was that HIV could be transmitted between mothers and babies through breast milk. He also did work with Nairobi sex workers, showing that a small percentage of them showed an immunity to the disease.


    "Frank is one of Canada's top scientists and his impact and legacy has reached all around the world," his former student, Dr Keith Fowke, told the BBC via email.


    "The world is a far better place for the contributions Frank made and he will be dearly missed by all of us." https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51317386


    During the days following the coronavirus outbreak articles were being circulated stating Frank plumbers lab grew stocks of the coronavirus after receiving it from Fouchier, using it to assess diagnostic tests as well as conducting tests to see which animals species could be infected with the virus.


    There were speculations and suspicion surrounding Frank Plumber as his lab was involved in the possible Chinese espionage scandal, and he was working on an HIV vaccine. At the time Indian scientists conducted a study finding that the Novel Coronavirus had HIV like insertions. The study was highly criticized leading them to withdraw the study, issuing an apology for being the source of unintended conspiracy theories. https://greatgameindia.com/uncanny-s...gp120-and-gag/

    “The study found 4 new AIDS like insertions in the Coronavirus which were absent from other Coronaviruses. This finding the study states is “unlikely to be fortuitous in nature”, meaning that it is not a naturally occurring phenomenon”.


    “We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag.


    Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.


    The scientists were surprised to observe such insertions and were startled “as it is quite unlikely for a virus to have acquired such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time”.


    Since the S protein of 2019-nCoV shares closest ancestry with SARS GZ02, the sequence coding for spike proteins of these two viruses were compared using MultiAlin software. We found four new insertions in the protein of 2019-nCoV- “GTNGTKR” (IS1), “HKNNKS” (IS2), “GDSSSG” (IS3) and “QTNSPRRA” (IS4).


    To our surprise, these sequence insertions were not only absent in S protein of SARS but were also not observed in any other member of the Coronaviridae family (Supplementary figure). This is startling as it is quite unlikely for a virus to have acquired such unique insertions naturally in a short duration of time.


    The study concludes that it is because of these 4 new AIDS like insertions that Wuhan Coronavirus has jumped to humans originally known only to infect animals.


    These proteins are critical for the viruses to identify and latch on to their host cells and for viral assembly. Since surface proteins are responsible for host tropism, changes in these proteins imply a change in host specificity of the virus. According to reports from China, there has been a gain of host specificity in case 2019-nCoV as the virus was originally known to infect animals and not humans but after the mutations, it has gained tropism to humans as well”. https://greatgameindia.com/indian-sc...ke-insertions/


    It should be noted this study was not retracted due to inaccuracy but due to the controversy it created.


    Nearly 2 years later, July 2021: “The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and Bombshell documents revealed that 15 strains of viruses including sample of the deadly zoonotic Nipah virus and several strains of the Ebola virus were sent on a commercial flight from Canada’s National Microbiology Lab to the Wuhan facility at the centre of the “lab leak” storm to China “for the purpose of scientific research” in March, 2019.


    It quoted a CBC News report confirming that one of the scientists escorted from the lab after an investigation in July last year was responsible for exporting the pathogens to China four months earlier. Dr Xiangguo Qiu was removed from Canada’s only level-4 lab over what is described as a possible “policy breach”. Dr Qiu dispatched Ebola and Henipah viruses to the lab. Canadian officials have been quick to confirm the shipments were not related to the coronavirus outbreak, adding that the reason for Dr Qiu’s eviction from the Winnipeg lab was not connected to the shipment.


    According to The Globe and Mail, PHAC said the firing of the scientists was an “administrative matter” and cited “possible breaches of security protocols”. But the shipment of the virus samples and the booting of the scientists have been shrouded in mystery for two years, alarming security experts and epidemiologists”. https://www.newsx.com/world/canada-v...bout-this.html



    While Canada was dealing with their own suspicious events regarding the Wuhan Laboratory, the US was dealing with events of their own. Two Chinese nationals and one Harvard University professor were arrested in three separate china related cases.


    “Yanqing Ye, 29, a Chinese national, was charged in an indictment today with one count each of visa fraud, making false statements, acting as an agent of a foreign government and conspiracy.


    According to the indictment, Ye is a Lieutenant of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the armed forces of the People’s Republic of China and member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). On her J-1 visa application, Ye falsely identified herself as a “student” and lied about her ongoing military service at the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), a top military academy directed by the CCP. It is further alleged that while studying at Boston University’s (BU) Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering from October 2017 to April 2019, Ye continued to work as a PLA Lieutenant completing numerous assignments from PLA officers such as conducting research, assessing U.S. military websites and sending U.S. documents and information to China.


    According to court documents, on April 20, 2019, federal officers interviewed Ye at Boston’s Logan International Airport. During the interview, it is alleged that Ye falsely claimed that she had minimal contact with two NUDT professors who were high-ranking PLA officers. However, a search of Ye’s electronic devices demonstrated that at the direction of one NUDT professor, who was a PLA Colonel, Ye had accessed U.S. military websites, researched U.S. military projects and compiled information for the PLA on two U.S. scientists with expertise in robotics and computer science. Furthermore, a review of a WeChat conversation revealed that Ye and the other PLA official from NUDT were collaborating on a research paper about a risk assessment model designed to decipher data for military applications. During the interview, Ye admitted that she held the rank of Lieutenant in the PLA and admitted she was a member of the CCP.


    Zaosong Zheng, 30, a Chinese national, was arrested on Dec. 10, 2019, at Boston’s Logan International Airport and charged by criminal complaint with attempting to smuggle 21 vials of biological research to China. On Jan. 21, 2020, Zheng was indicted on one count of smuggling goods from the United States and one count of making false, fictitious or fraudulent statements. He has been detained since Dec. 30, 2019.


    In August 2018, Zheng entered the United States on a J-1 visa and conducted cancer-cell research at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston from Sept. 4, 2018, to Dec. 9, 2019. It is alleged that on Dec. 9, 2019, Zheng stole 21 vials of biological research and attempted to smuggle them out of the United States aboard a flight destined for China. Federal officers at Logan Airport discovered the vials hidden in a sock inside one of Zheng’s bags, and not properly packaged. It is alleged that initially, Zheng lied to officers about the contents of his luggage, but later admitted he had stolen the vials from a lab at Beth Israel. Zheng stated that he intended to bring the vials to China to use them to conduct research in his own laboratory and publish the results under his own name.


    Dr. Charles Lieber, 60, Chair of the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard University, was arrested this morning and charged by criminal complaint with one count of making a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement.


    According to court documents, since 2008, Dr. Lieber who has served as the Principal Investigator of the Lieber Research Group at Harvard University, which specialized in the area of nanoscience, has received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defense (DOD). These grants require the disclosure of significant foreign financial conflicts of interest, including financial support from foreign governments or foreign entities. Unbeknownst to Harvard University beginning in 2011, Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017. China’s Thousand Talents Plan is one of the most prominent Chinese Talent recruit plans that are designed to attract, recruit, and cultivate high-level scientific talent in furtherance of China’s scientific development, economic prosperity and national security. These talent programs seek to lure Chinese overseas talent and foreign experts to bring their knowledge and experience to China and reward individuals for stealing proprietary information. Under the terms of Lieber’s three-year Thousand Talents contract, WUT paid Lieber $50,000 USD per month, living expenses of up to 1,000,000 Chinese Yuan (approximately $158,000 USD at the time) and awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT. In return, Lieber was obligated to work for WUT “not less than nine months a year” by “declaring international cooperation projects, cultivating young teachers and Ph.D. students, organizing international conference[s], applying for patents and publishing articles in the name of” WUT.


    The complaint alleges that in 2018 and 2019, Lieber lied about his involvement in the Thousand Talents Plan and affiliation with WUT. On or about, April 24, 2018, during an interview with investigators, Lieber stated that he was never asked to participate in the Thousand Talents Program, but he “wasn’t sure” how China categorized him. In November 2018, NIH inquired of Harvard whether Lieber had failed to disclose his then-suspected relationship with WUT and China’s Thousand Talents Plan. Lieber caused Harvard to falsely tell NIH that Lieber “had no formal association with WUT” after 2012, that “WUT continued to falsely exaggerate” his involvement with WUT in subsequent years, and that Lieber “is not and has never been a participant in” China’s Thousand Talents Plan”. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harva...-china-related






    “Charles Lieber, chair of Harvard’s department of chemistry and chemical biology, and a University Professor, a designation bestowed on only the most eminent scholars, has been arrested, charged with misleading investigators from the Department of Defense about his work for a Chinese government-sponsored program designed to identify and financially support leading scientific researchers both in China and abroad. The U.S. government has characterized the program as a threat to national security”. https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2020/01/lieber-arrest


    “Until late last month, Charles Lieber lived the quiet life of an elite American scientist. His lab at Harvard University researched things like how to meld tiny electronics with the brain. In his spare time, he grew award-winning pumpkins in front of his house.


    And then, on Jan. 28, the FBI came knocking on his door.


    Now Lieber faces charges of trading knowledge for money and lying about it. Prosecutors allege he set up a lab in China in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars in payments from the Chinese government and then denied knowledge of those payments to U.S. investigators.


    Lieber set up the "WUT-Harvard Joint Nano Key Laboratory," according to the complaint, without telling Harvard about it. The complaint says that when questioned by Harvard and investigators from the Department of Defense, which, together with the NIH, gave him nearly $18 million in grants, Lieber said, "He was never asked to participate in the Thousand Talents Program." https://www.npr.org/2020/02/14/80612...tific-openness




    Clearly we may never know if the release of the Coronavirus was intentional, or an accident. But one thing I do know is that all of the evidence deserves to be looked at.


    On January 3rd the world learned that a mysterious respiratory illness was spreading through Wuhan, by the 9th it was labeled as a Coronavirus and announced to the world. Nearly one month later on February 11th Tedros of the WHO was televised at a press conference stating, “Of course Ebola and this are not the same. Ebola is lousy. This is airborne, corona is airborne, it's more contagious and you have seen how it went into 24 countries although it's a small number of cases. In terms of potential to wreak havoc the corona is very different from Ebola; corona has more potency, virulence. We take it more seriously”.


    Moments later he changes his statement saying, "Okay. Sorry, I used the military word, airborne. It meant to spread via droplets or respiratory transmission. Please take it that way; not the military language. Thank you." It is hard to imagine such a dramatic, strong, and drawn out comment was merely a misspeak. https://www.who.int/docs/default-sou...rsn=e2019136_2


    Keep in mind if there was even a sliver of a chance that the WHO knew the coronavirus was airborne, they would be single handedly responsible for it spreading the way it did. If we would have known, we could have taken strict measures early when it would have counted. In the early stages we were advised by our leaders to take no precautions at all.


    The WHO held strong to their stance that the virus was not airborne, going so far as to put out a fact check in March, against the spread of misinformation on the virus being airborne. Time and time again they would tell the public that there was simply not enough evidence to suggest that the virus was airborne. https://who.africa-newsroom.com/pres...s-not-airborne


    While the WHO held fast to their stance, and public guidance, science was telling a different story. As early as April of 2020 a study had shown that the virus remained viable in the air for up to three hours, concluding that both aerosol and fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 were plausible, since the virus can remain viable and infectious in aerosols for hours and on surfaces up to days. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2004973


    In June of 2020 another published paper concluded that the airborne transmission route is highly virulent and dominant for the spread of COVID-19. It also stated, "Curbing the COVID-19 relies not only on decisive and sweeping actions but also, critically, on the scientific understanding of the virus transmission routes, which determines the effectiveness of the mitigation measures." "The inadequate knowledge on virus transmission has inevitably hindered development of effective mitigation policies and resulted in unstoppable propagation of the COVID-19 pandemic." https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2009637117


    In another paper released that same month, it talked about how Sars-1 and 2 share many similarities, and studies had shown that the main vehicle of transmission in Sars-1 was airborne transmission. Furthermore they also stated, "Considering the many similarities between the two SARS viruses and the evidence on virus transport in general, it is highly likely that the SARS-CoV-2 virus also spreads by air. Experts in droplet dynamics and airflow in buildings agree on this. Therefore, all possible precautions against airborne transmission in indoor scenarios should be taken."


    "Precautions can be taken only when the national bodies responsible for the control of the outbreak acknowledge the significance of this route of transmission and recommend appropriate actions. Currently, this is not the case anywhere in the world."


    "We predict that this failure to immediately recognize and acknowledge the importance of airborne transmission and to take adequate actions against it will result in additional cases of infection in the coming weeks and months, which would not occur if these actions were taken. The air transmission issue should be taken seriously now, during the course of the epidemic. When the epidemic is over and retrospective data demonstrates the importance of airborne transmission it will be too late." https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...54X?via%3Dihub


    In July of 2020 in an open letter an appeal was made to the medical community and to the relevant national and international bodies to recognize the potential for airborne spread of coronavirus disease. The letter states, "Studies by the signatories and other scientists have demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that viruses are released during exhalation, talking, and coughing in microdroplets small enough to remain aloft in air and pose a risk of exposure at distances beyond 1–2 m from an infected individual."


    "It is understood that there is not as yet universal acceptance of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV2; but in our collective assessment there is more than enough supporting evidence so that the precautionary principle should apply. In order to control the pandemic." https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/71/9/2311/5867798


    Soon after the publishing of this paper, the WHO released a scientific brief, to include that in some cases there could be the possibility of airborne transmission, but that there is no definitive proof, and that the other modes of transmission may be the culprit. Simply stating that it cannot be ruled out. Stating they still considered the science on the subject as insufficient for further measures. https://www.who.int/news-room/commen...on-precautions


    At this point we can only speculate, on how different the outcome of this pandemic would have been, had the WHO taken the advice of the scientists early on. Perhaps we could have done more early on to prevent the spread and saved countless lives.


    It wouldn’t be until the spring of 2021, “WHO Finally Admits Coronavirus Is Airborne. It’s Too Late”. On 30 April 2021, almost 10 months after WHO said it would review the research on airborne transmission, it finally updated its Q&A page with the following statement:


    “Current evidence suggests that the virus spreads mainly between people who are in close contact with each other, typically within 1 metre (short-range). A person can be infected when aerosols or droplets containing the virus are inhaled or come directly into contact with the eyes, nose, or mouth. The virus can also spread in poorly ventilated and/or crowded indoor settings, where people tend to spend longer periods of time. This is because aerosols remain suspended in the air or travel farther than 1 metre (long-range).”


    WHO's statement is too little, too late”. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jvchama...h=101703bb4472


    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is finally acknowledging something that health experts have been saying for a while now: COVID-19 spreads through the air and can be inhaled by someone who is more than six feet away. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...ay/ar-BB1gvLwF


    In the beginning of the outbreak there were key measures that could have been taken to stop the spread of the virus, somehow we were advised against all of those measures.


    February 2020: WHO chief says widespread travel bans not needed to beat China virus: World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Monday there was no need for measures that “unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade” in trying to halt the spread of a coronavirus.
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-c...-idUSKBN1ZX1H3


    Should you wear a face mask?: “Wearing a mask can provide a false sense of security, say experts, leading some to become less vigilant in more important hygiene measures, such as hand washing. Additionally, removing a mask so it no longer covers your nose, or touching the outside of the mask can make it less effective.


    Key to remember, say WHO officials, is that coronavirus is spread by droplets and not airborne transmission. “The most likely person to become a case is someone who has been in significant contact of another case,” said Ryan.


    Mask wearing by the general public is not among the WHO’s recommendations. “We don’t generally recommend the wearing of masks in public by otherwise well individuals because it has not up to now been associated with any particular benefit,” said Ryan”. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/...-who-briefing/


    Surgeon general: Data doesn't back up wearing masks in public amid coronavirus pandemic: “It's important to understand that we are looking at the data every single day and we make the best recommendations to the American people we can based on what we know,” Adams said on Tuesday.


    “What the World Health Organization [WHO] and the CDC [The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] have reaffirmed in the last few days is that they do not recommend the general public wear masks.”


    “We still have PPE [Personal protective equipment] shortages across the country,” Adams noted. “The WHO mentioned this in their statement so we want to make sure we are reserving PPE for the people who most need it. That's how you are going to get the largest effect because if healthcare workers get sick, they can't take care of you when you get sick.”


    “Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS!” Adams wrote on Twitter, addressing fears over the spread of the virus in the U.S.


    “They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!” https://www.foxnews.com/media/surgeo...ic-coronavirus


    In a way it sounded like we were being told masks don’t work unless you are a health care worker……
    Meanwhile due to CDC guidance nurses across the US were begging hospitals to let them bring their own masks to work. They were told they weren't allowed to buy their own masks because they might not be the right kind. So health care workers were not allowed to buy them, but neither were we?


    We were told the reason we shouldn't wear them was because we needed to make sure there were enough for health care workers, but the health care workers don’t get masks at hardware stores, they get them from medical suppliers. The reasons we were told we shouldn’t wear a mask falls flat.


    Michigan Medicine nurses: Let us bring in our own N95 masks: Every day, nurses are putting their own lives on the line to take care of patients with COVID-19. Nurses at Michigan Medicine say they are not being given the right kind of face masks, and they’ve been told they’re not allowed to bring in their own personal protective equipment.


    Michigan Medicine nurses say even in the Intensive Care Unit that’s filled with coronavirus patients, they are only allowed to use paper surgical masks unless they are doing specific procedures.


    “If people get sick, they can’t work, they can’t take care of the patients, which is why we went into this profession in the first place,” said Katie Oppenheim, President of the University of Michigan Professional Nurse Council. The union represents about 6,200 nurses at Michigan Medicine.


    Oppenheim says nurses are provided the necessary N95 masks only during certain procedures, such as intubation or suctioning. The rest of the time, she says the only have surgical masks.


    Oppenheim says Michigan Medicine nurses want to bring in their own N95 masks and respirator masks, but hospital administration has told them they can’t use their own PPE.


    “It’s very difficult to understand why people who are not on the front lines every day would think that it’s in any way acceptable not to provide the safest environment possible,” Oppenheim said.


    The American Medical Association and other leading health organizations, such as The Joint Commission, recommend that doctors and nurses be allowed to purchase their own protective gear if their hospitals can’t provide them”. https://www.wxyz.com/news/coronaviru...-own-n95-masks


    Nurses suspended for refusing to provide COVID-19 care without N95 masks: “At Providence Saint John's Health Center in Santa Monica, California, Gulick and his colleagues worried that caring for infected patients without first being able to don an N95 respirator mask was risky. The N95 mask filters out 95% of all airborne particles, including ones too tiny to be blocked by regular masks. But administrators at his hospital said they weren't necessary and didn't provide them, he said.


    He and a handful of nurses told their managers they wouldn't enter COVID-19 patient rooms without N95 masks. The hospital suspended them, according to the National Nurses Union, which represents them. Ten nurses are now being paid but not allowed to return to work pending an investigation from human resources, the union said.


    They are among hundreds of doctors, nurses and other health care workers across the country who say they've been asked to work without adequate protection. Some have taken part in protests or lodged formal complaints. Others are buying - or even making - their own supplies.


    Guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention don't require N95 masks for COVID-19 caregivers, but many hospitals are opting for the added protection because the infection has proven to be extremely contagious. The CDC said Wednesday at least 9,200 health care workers have been infected.


    Angela Gatdula, a Saint John's nurse who fell ill with COVID-19, said she asked hospital managers why doctors were wearing N95s but nurses weren't. She says they told her that the CDC said surgical masks were enough to keep her safe.


    Then she was hit with a dry cough, severe body aches and joint pain.


    "When I got the phone call that I was positive I got really scared," she said.


    She's now recovering and plans to return to work next week.


    "The next nurse that gets this might not be lucky. They might require hospitalization. They might die," she said”. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronav...out-n95-masks/
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  13. #8
    Points: 84,798, Level: 70
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 52
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    27584
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    11,128
    Points
    84,798
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    14,094
    Thanked 9,553x in 5,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    5 of 13

    Nurses 'Absolutely' Fear for Their Health After New CDC Guidelines on Masks: More and more patients are streaming into hospitals with COVID-19. This means more and more health care workers are also at risk. And yet, the amount of personal protective equipment (PPE) for nurses continues to dwindle. Over the past few weeks, I've spoken with health care workers who are increasingly concerned about not just their patients' health - but their own.


    "There is not enough PPE," one nurse in Northeast Ohio told Townhall last week. "What masks we do have are locked up in management offices and not available. We are also told that we are not to wear a mask unless occupational health directs us, on a case-by-case basis.


    This nurse, who asked to remain anonymous, said they were notified by email and were offered no chance to respond.


    "They rationalized based on the CDC's lower standards," she explained. "It was ordered to us as non-negotiable."


    More than one health care worker told me that the CDC changed its guidelines because it realized it had a shortage of N95 masks.


    A recent study revealed that 16 percent of all COVID-19 cases in Ohio were health care workers, a statistic that this particular nurse said she is "not at all surprised" by”.


    Likewise, in one hospital in Utah, nurses are having to write their names down on their masks, put them in a bag, and reuse them the next day since the CDC changed its guidelines and approved multi-patient, all-day use of masks. They even approved the use of "homemade masks," one health care worker told me, and they are concerned for their health. Again, they asked to remain anonymous.


    "They're putting our families in danger, and they're putting our co-workers in danger," Kristine Fry, a nurse at Kaiser Santa Clara, told NBC News”. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...pment-n2565896


    More than 3,600 US health workers died in COVID's 1st year: “The yearlong series of investigative reports found that many of these deaths could have been prevented. Widespread shortages of masks and other personal protective gear, a lack of covid testing, weak contact tracing, inconsistent mask guidance by politicians, missteps by employers and lax enforcement of workplace safety rules by government regulators all contributed to the increased risk faced by health care workers. Studies show that health care workers were more than three times as likely to contract covid as the general public”.


    The project found that Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance on masks — which encouraged hospitals to reserve high-performance N95 masks for intubation procedures and initially suggested surgical masks were adequate for everyday patient care — may have put thousands of health workers at risk.


    Among the most visceral findings of Lost on the Frontline was the devastating impact of PPE shortages”. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/3600-u...ry?id=76944085


    When you look at the actual events that played out in the timeline, you can clearly see the WHO said it was airborne, then backtracked, and said it wasn’t even though the science said otherwise. Once again, a manufactured crisis emerges. Nurses were prevented from using or purchasing their own PPE, even though they were dying. At the same time the public was also discouraged from buying PPE, while we were dying and the virus was spreading and taking hold.


    If you look at the actual time line, it nearly appears that the virus was let to spread intentionally, and no one was allowed to protect themselves. Travel was not restricted, those who tried to wear masks were shamed. It’s so easy to get caught in what ever the current thing is, but it’s vitally important to stop, and take a look at the whole picture. The reality of what is happening is not always what it seems. If we see things for what they are perhaps we will not stand for certain things or be so easily manipulated.


    Trump himself said the virus was airborne. Trump says everyone knew the coronavirus was airborne in February: It’s ‘no big thing’: “This is stuff that everyone knew. There’s a report that I have here someplace where China said it was airborne earlier than the statements I made. People knew it was airborne. This was nothing,” he said Thursday in a White House press briefing. “When I say it was airborne, everybody knew it was airborne. This was no big thing. Read the reports. China came out with a statement that it was an airborne disease. I heard it was an airborne disease. I assumed it early on”. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/10/trum...big-thing.html


    If this is the case then what took place, is a crime against humanity.


    Then again if anyone was paying attention we would have noticed that China was spraying the air with disinfectant, if that wasn’t a hint that the virus was airborne, I don’t know what else could be. https://www.businessinsider.com/wuha...es-2020-2?op=1


    To make matters worse healthcare workers who had put everything on the line to save lives during the pandemic, were fired for not taking an experimental Covid vaccine. These people had selflessly worked in unsafe conditions, knowing that they themselves could die. They worked without proper masks, constantly exposed to high viral loads. They had to intubate and bury their own co workers. They were hailed as heroes, but two years later they were thrown away.


    Comments on social media and main stream news mocked them, after all they had sacrificed. The most shocking part is how the masses went along with this mocking and segregating, did they not remember what these people had went through, or what they sacrificed? Did they not remember these people walked into a room where they knew a killer virus was thick in the air, and that any day they could be the next one to die? But they did it because someone had to, someone had to try. I find it hard to forget, after all it’s only been two years…..


    All we were allowed to hear about the vaccine was that it was safe and effective, anything else was instantly called a conspiracy, or antivaxxer propaganda. Doctors and nurses were not allowed to speak up if they seen negative affects, many were discouraged from reporting to VAERS. Individuals who had chosen to take the vaccine and got sick were not allowed to tell their stories, and those who were brave enough to do so were slandered and shamed in the worst ways.


    It wasn’t only healthcare workers we threw away, we threw away police who had dedicated their lives to protecting the public. We threw away firefighters who are the first ones there for us in an emergency. These are people who we count on with our lives when push comes to shove. Officers who chose not to take the vaccine were treated like common criminals, and segregated from society in shame. Regarded as conspiracy theorists, all for expressing their right to choose what they put in their own body. These people had a choice: submit, or lose their livelihood. It came down to punishing people who would not comply with losing everything, how would they feed their families, pay their mortgage? Those brave enough to stand for what they believed in, had to sacrifice it all.


    Many of these healthcare workers, police, and firefighters already had covid at some point during the pandemic, especially since they served without proper PPE during the early stages. Although many of them had robust natural immunity, it was not recognized by the authorities. It was the vaccine or nothing.


    Even worse we began to hand out death sentences to people who would not get the vaccine, we started to withhold medical procedures, knowing that people would die without needed procedures. People on social media championed this, stating that these people didn’t deserve organ transplants or what ever procedure it might be, because they chose to not get vaccinated.


    A sort of madness seemed to grip the world, there was not a day that went by where people weren't pushing for tougher mandates, and the segregation of the unvaccinated. Honestly it was hard to witness people delving to such depravity and cruelty against their fellow man. People who were once decent, now publicly stating that the unvaccinated deserved to die, and shouldn’t be allowed to even go to the hospital and take up beds. They shouldn’t be allowed to participate in society with everyone else, not even go to the store for groceries, and be on permanent lock down.


    You have to wonder how we got here, how did we fall so far, how did people snap so thoroughly? But then you look at the timeline in it’s raw unfiltered state, and you see that something similar to a psychological operation conducted on the world. People were pushed to the brink of madness. During the MK Ultra experiments they said people had to be wiped clean with trauma to be reprogrammed.


    In many ways the entire world underwent a form of both mental and physical torture. They were subjected to fear and mass death for two years straight, watching as over 6 million people died. They were subjected to economic decline, food shortages, lock downs, isolation, segregation, censorship, and constant fear. May I remind you these were all manufactured. Life saving medicines were withheld, doctors who tried to save lives threatened with imprisonment, toxic lethal medicines were the only forms of treatment allowed exacerbating the death tolls. As society reached their breaking point, suicides and overdoses skyrocketed, not only among the adults but in children too.


    Our children lost years of their lives, and education. The damage done is in many ways beyond repair. As a world we will suffer with the trauma for the rest of our lives. We have all experienced together a form of collective torture from the very people who we put our trust in.


    In order that this madness be perpetuated the masses are divided, kept at each others necks, caught in a constant barrage of political crossfire, and mass propaganda constantly spit out by the main stream and social media.




    Mind Control: Torture and Hypnosis


    At some point you have to wonder how is it possible that so many people seem to have gone completely mad, or how is it that doctors and nurses would willingly go along with withholding life saving measures from dying patients, or give them an injection that they know will kill them? How is it that the masses would agree with segregating half of the population and bar them from medical care effectively calling for the death penalty for their fellow man?


    Here are some examples of the madness:


    “Why Unvaccinated People Are Being Denied Organ Transplants”. https://www.healthline.com/health-ne...an-transplants


    “Colorado hospital system denies organ transplants to unvaccinated patients: A Colorado hospital system says it is denying organ transplants to patients who haven’t been vaccinated against COVID-19 “in almost all situations” under a new policy”. https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/colora...-unvaccinated/


    “Washington state man claims hospital refusing transplants to the unvaccinated”. https://www.foxnews.com/media/washin...s-unvaccinated


    “Unvaccinated patients say they were denied access into medical clinics: Two Calgary women are speaking out after they were denied access into medical facilities because of their vaccination statuses.


    Bree Alexander says she took her six-month old daughter Kalayah to the MCI The Doctor’s Office clinic in the southeast to examine eczema on her infant’s foot. When she arrived and revealed she didn’t have her COVID-19 shots, she says the staff told her she wasn’t allowed in the building”. https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/unvaccina...nics-1.5598244


    “If Covid vaccine refusers are turned away at hospitals and doctor offices, is that ethical?
    Taking vaccination status into account when deciding whether to treat a patient can be acceptable — sometimes. Dr. Jason Valentine, a family medicine physician at the Diagnostic and Medical Clinic Infirmary Health in Mobile, Alabama, informed his patients this month that, effective Oct. 1, he would no longer treat those who hadn’t been vaccinated against Covid-19. Around the same time, a leaked memo indicated that the North Texas Mass Critical Care Guideline Task Force was considering whether to take Covid vaccination status into account in deciding who gets ICU beds when more of them are needed than are available”. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinio...es-ncna1277475


    “Kimmel rips unvaccinated people and says they don't deserve ICU beds if hospitals get overcrowded: As penance for their decision not to get the vaccine, unvaccinated people should be denied a place in hospitals if they need care, Kimmel suggested.


    "Dr. Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're going to have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU bed," Kimmel said. "That choice doesn't seem so tough to me. 'Vaccinated person having a heart attack? Yes, come right on in — we'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo? Rest in peace, wheezy.'" https://news.yahoo.com/kimmel-rips-u...152900216.html


    “Should Unvaccinated Be Denied Health Care? Hospitals facing medical triage should consider adopting this policy: As controversial as it may be, we should deprioritize the eligible unvaccinated patients during medical triage. It’s a free country, and you can absolutely choose not to get the vaccine. But choices have consequences, and the willingly unvaccinated have made this consequence necessary”. https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2021/08/2...d-health-care/


    ““Should We Limit Health Care to the Unvaccinated? Local group does a No Mask Mob Shop, it’s a thing. We can’t fight them, but do we have to treat them when they get sick”?”


    “I’ve never been one to suggest that someone should be denied health care for almost any reason. An outlier example; someone who received a new liver after a lifetime of abuse, couldn’t quit drinking and damaged the donor organ. I can have all the empathy in the world for the addiction, but someone else should get the next available liver.


    With just about every other medical need, however, I strongly disagree in limiting health care based on risky or unhealthy choices. I don’t care if it’s smoking, riding a motorcycle, or skiing. I don’t care if someone’s obese, or a thrill seeker; if they need medical care, I think we should give it to them.


    But I think I found another outlier; the unvaccinated in a pandemic.


    Many of these folks who frame this issue as medical freedom, or the right for self-determination without government interference, also believe in a do-it-yourself individualism. They subscribe to a belief that free will also means being responsible. In other words, there are consequences for your choices.


    Well, let’s let them have those consequences”. https://medium.com/politically-speak...d-321f570b2979


    “Should the unvaccinated be a lower priority for health care? When there was no vaccine, medical triage was straightforward. But now, the situation is changing. It’s not a level playing field — many of the sick needing care have turned down a vaccine that could have prevented them from needing hospital care.


    This raises an uncomfortable ethical question: Should eligible, unvaccinated people be medically triaged at the same priority level as the vaccinated”? https://ncpolicywatch.com/2021/08/12...r-health-care/


    “A Popular Doctor Went On MSNBC To Advocate For Denying Anti-Vaxxers Access To Major Medical Treatments: Dr. Vin Gupta, has a novel solution for this novel virus: No vax, no medical treatment”. Dr. Gupta appeared on MSNBC on Monday to discuss his bold proposal with Joy Reid, and specifically made the point that his idea is not as unprecedented as it sounds. Using the example of a patient in need of a liver transplant—”You can’t get a liver if you had been drinking in the last six months”—Gupta believes it would be in the best interest of the public (and public health policy) to apply the same protocols to individuals who refuse to be vaccinated against COVID”. https://uproxx.com/viral/doctor-advo...al-treatments/


    CNN's Leana Wen: The Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
    "You have the option to not get vaccinated if you want," said the doctor. "But then you can't go out in public."


    "We need to start looking at the choice to remain unvaccinated the same as we look at driving while intoxicated," she told CNN's Chris Cuomo Thursday night. "You have the option to not get vaccinated if you want, but then you can't go out in public."


    Wen elaborated that society has an "obligation to prevent" the unvaccinated from leaving their homes and infecting others, in the same way that society has an obligation to deter drunk drivers.


    "The vaccinated should not have to pay the price for the so-called choices of the unvaccinated anymore," she continued”. https://reason.com/2021/09/10/cnn-le...l-outdoor-ban/


    “Don Lemon: These Should Be the Punishments for People Who Refuse the COVID Vaccine. CNN host Don Lemon voiced his support for those who do not want to be vaccinated against COVID-19 to be ostracized from society and should not be able to go grocery shopping or being able to hold a job.


    "I’m sure a lot of people are not going to agree with this but don’t get the vaccine, you can’t go to the supermarket. Don’t have the vaccine, can’t go to the ball game. Don’t have a vaccine, can’t go to work. You don’t have a vaccine, can’t come here. No shirt, no shoes, no service," Lemon said on Monday night to host Chris Cuomo”. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/julior...ciety-n2593158


    “Tax the Unvaxxed? Why Stop There?: Tax the Unvaxxed,” writes Anne Kim in the Washington Monthly, arguing that “people who refuse the COVID vaccine are imposing costs on society. Time to make them pay.” Kim proposes a variety of privately imposed surcharges (not taxes) — for instance, restaurants and airlines could impose charges on unvaccinated customers and high-school wrestling teams on unvaxxed participants”. https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/...hy-stop-there/




    “[I]t’s time to start blaming the unvaccinated folks,” Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey said recently.


    Life for the unvaccinated will be increasingly inconvenient.


    It should also become increasingly expensive.


    So far, we haven’t asked these stubbornly unvaccinated to bear their share of the broader financial impact their “personal” decisions have on the families and communities around them. Instead, we’ve bent over backwards to respect their perspective, coddled their hesitancy, and granted them a free ride on the backs of Americans who’ve tried to do everything right.


    That has to change. Willful vaccine resisters should pay their fair share of the price—literally—for what their behavior has cost and is costing the rest of us”. https://washingtonmonthly.com/2021/0...-the-unvaxxed/




    “Here's Why The Unvaccinated Have No 'Right' To Show Up In Public
    COLUMN: Your site knows more than the CDC. You're "free" not to be vaccinated. Fine. But don't show up at a concert demanding to be let in.


    You shouldn't be in a society if all you care about is your individual rights. You shouldn't be able to see anyone or anything anywhere, because your hubris is so great that you believe it's your prerogative to infect people — some of whom could die because of your arrogance.


    You should be able to see out your window, order groceries, work from home and stay away from the rest of us. That's what you should have the freedom to do. I know I wouldn't have gotten COVID-19 last month if the unvaccinated hadn't allowed delta and other variants to gain a foothold in the United States.


    Oh, I was told by an anti-vaxxer that I could have been infected by someone who was vaccinated just like I was. Yes, sunshine, that's true. But eventually, it all tracks back to unvaccinated people mingling with vaccinated people who are helping to create evermore-resilient variants of the virus”.
    https://patch.com/texas/dallas-ftwor...ht-show-public


    “Poll: 45% of Dems Support Internment Camps for Unvaccinated, 59% Support Home Lockdowns
    A dangerous strain of authoritarianism: You didn’t read that wrong, nearly half of Democrats polled recently support sending unvaccinated Americans to “designated facilities” if they continue to refuse the Covid-19 vaccination. We used to call that sort of thing an “internment camp” and most reasonable people tend to shy away from such inhumane measures.


    Perhaps more alarming, though, is that 59% of the same respondents support enforcing a permanent home lockdown for unvaxxed individuals as well.


    The data comes from Rasmussen and is worth examining since it exemplifies the current divide in America among people who want some kind of normalcy, and people willing to permanently imprison their neighbors if they don’t elect to receive a shot”. https://www.uspresidentialelectionne...ome-lockdowns/


    “COVID-19: Democratic Voters Support Harsh Measures Against Unvaccinated


    Nearly half (48%) of Democratic voters think federal and state governments should be able to fine or imprison individuals who publicly question the efficacy of the existing COVID-19 vaccines on social media, television, radio, or in online or digital publications.


    How far are Democrats willing to go in punishing the unvaccinated? Twenty-nine percent (29%) of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine”. https://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...t_unvaccinated


    “It's time to start shunning the 'vaccine hesitant.' They're blocking COVID herd immunity.
    Enough analysis of these human petri dishes. Everyone who wants a vaccine will soon have one, and proof should be required to work, play and travel.


    The time for analyzing why these human petri dishes have chosen to ignore the medical science that could save them, and us, is over. We need a different strategy. I propose shunning.


    Biden’s wildly successful vaccine rollout means that soon everyone who wants a vaccine will have one. When that happens, restaurants, movie theaters, gyms, barbers, airlines and Ubers should require proof of vaccination before providing their services.


    And it shouldn’t stop there. Businesses should make vaccination a requirement for employment. A COVID-19 outbreak can shut down a business and be financially devastating. And failure to enforce basic health and safety measures is not fair to employees who have to work in offices, factories and stores where close contact is required. Things should get personal, too: People should require friends to be vaccinated to attend the barbecues and birthday parties they host. Friends don’t let friends spread the coronavirus”. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...mn/4886673001/


    “Inslee: Get vaxxed ‘no matter what we find out about omicron’ Inslee said 34% of Washingtonians remain unvaccinated, presenting a danger to the state”. https://www.koin.com/news/washington...icron-spreads/


    “President Joe Biden delivered remarks on Monday on the administration's COVID-19 response and the status of the economy. Biden warned that people who do not get the vaccine will "end up paying the price" https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...the_price.html#!




    “Americans Joyfully Sign Petition to Arrest and Jail the Unvaccinated


    Dice interviewed scores of people in Southern California while holding a fake petition and asked questions such as, “Do you think people who refuse to take a COVID vaccine should be arrested?”


    An alarming number of those he interviewed in San Diego signed a petition they thought might lead to jail for those who haven’t been vaccinated. Some of them even agreed with Dice’s obviously satirical statements challenging one’s rights to medical choice and body autonomy.


    “I don’t wanna hear any of this ‘My body, may choice’ stuff in today’s new world order”. https://www.westernjournal.com/watch...-unvaccinated/


    “It would be helpful if people who refuse the COVID-19 vaccine started viewing themselves as a public safety threat rather than victims of the growing requirements aimed at keeping them from spreading the deadly virus to others.


    Then they might understand why a majority of the public is frustrated and angry with them, as well as why businesses and governments are putting restrictions on commercial, employment and social opportunities for people who won’t get vaccinated.


    It’s bad enough that people who won’t get the shot put themselves and their families at great risk. There’s also danger to others”. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com...vid-19-vaccine


    “Plaschke: NFL players who won't get vaccinated should get flagged for recklessness


    There should be plenty of pressure. Teammates who don’t get the COVID-19 vaccine aren’t just bad, they’re selfish and misguided and dangerous.


    Unvaccinated players will be subject to strict protocols that will separate them from the team, with those players facing a $14,650 fine for each time they break those protocols.


    If a team suffers a COVID-19 outbreak that causes the cancellation of a game, then the team will not be paid for that game, meaning unvaccinated players could be taking money out of that team’s pockets.


    ”There’s no scientific reason to avoid getting vaccinated,” said Anne Rimoin, a UCLA epidemiologist.


    She noted that the NFL has every right, and every reason, to punish those who make that choice”. https://news.yahoo.com/commentary-nf...113015565.html




    “Judge Blocks Mother’s Shared Custody over COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal: A mother in Illinois says a judge has stripped her parental rights because she is not vaccinated against COVID-19, according to a new report”. https://news.yahoo.com/judge-blocks-...145906661.html


    “COVID vaccine stance could affect child custody: Go to a concert, see a ballgame, get on an airplane. There are some things you cannot do unless you’ve been vaccinated against COVID-19.


    Now vaccination status may be an issue for parents who share custody of their children.


    Alexander cites a case from 2020 (Guerin v. Geurin) in which a father of three children was flouting safety protocols, potentially putting the health of his ex-wife and kids at risk.


    The mother was granted exclusive possession of the matrimonial home on a temporary basis; contact between the father and the kids was reduced to zoom or phone only.


    If either parent ignores safety protocols, “the court will step in and make an order to make sure the child is safe,” said Alexander.


    “The court has no patience with someone who doesn’t follow health protocols”. https://torontosun.com/news/local-ne...-child-custody


    You do not have the ‘constitutional right’ to refuse the Covid-19 vaccine:


    “Now that the US Food and Drug Administration has approved the Pfizer/ BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older, it’s time for all governments across the country to mandate the vaccine for people taking part in indoor activities. There are no more valid excuses for not being vaccinated other than health reasons.


    One frequently heard pushback against vaccine mandates is that there is a “constitutional right” to choose whether to be vaccinated or not for adults and a right to determine whether children can be vaccinated. That is a non-starter in the midst of a pandemic.


    The Constitution is not a suicide pact guaranteeing a right to harm others. The government has latitude to protect citizens from deadly conditions, especially when the science supporting vaccination is so clear”. https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/25/opini...fit/index.html


    (Fact check) “Could People Be Jailed, Fined for Refusing COVID-19 Vaccine in US? Individual U.S. states would be legally authorized to impose criminal penalties on individuals who refused to undergo a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. True”.


    Conclusion


    It’s clear that the doctrine of state police power, as set out in the Jacobson case and subsequent federal court decisions, means individual states could, in principle, introduce a constitutionally sound mandatory COVID-19 vaccination program, and states could impose criminal penalties for those who, without a recognized exemption, refused to be vaccinated”. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/st...covid-vaccine/


    “Letter: Enough already. Punish those who refuse the vaccine


    I think those who have gotten vaccinated should take action against the remainder who have refused to do so. I believe the government should get involved and assess some sort of penalty against those who are flagrantly thumbing their noses at the vaccine.


    There should be a financial penalty assessed via a deduction made against their Social Security checks, or they should be denied Medicare coverage. Or the government could withhold an amount from their annual federal income tax refund.


    Stop the insanity and let's take whatever steps necessary to rid us of the coronavirus”. https://www.stltoday.com/opinion/mai...8936c5ac3.html






    In July of 2020 during the Trump administration, the CDC considered placing high risk individuals in camps, the fact checkers came out in force stating that it was false, yet there is a document by the CDC that says otherwise. Anyone who spoke of it was called a conspiracy theorist. It was never implemented but it was talked about and considered at the time, and that is a fact.


    Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings:


    “What is the Shielding Approach1?


    The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents”.






    Camp/Sector Level:


    A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.


    One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone”. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...anitarian.html


    “In Quebec, in 2022, we locked up kids aged six to 10 for up to 10 days in windowless rooms. Let that sink in. This was a public health measure that had been drafted, approved, and applied,” he said, seemingly referring to a story about teens in Quebec group homes who were forced to isolate after COVID exposure”. https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2022/0...ndates-change/




    Those are just some examples of the madness we witnessed during the Covid pandemic. If someone would have told us a few years ago that people would be calling for the death of their fellow citizens or for them to be locked up in camps it would have been hard to believe. But something happened to people. People who were once compassionate and cared about justice were now calling for the extermination of half the population. It is shocking beyond words, and those who are doing it, don’t even seem to realize it. They don’t even have an inkling that they have become extremists of the highest order.


    If you lay out the timeline, you will see that as a collective the people of the world went through torture, mind control, brainwashing and hypnosis on a mass scale. Many who have compared what we see in the world to Nazi Germany are ridiculed, but in reality, it is far worse. What we are seeing is on a scale Hitler could have only dreamed of.


    Let us look at the techniques, they will sound familiar.


    There are several different methods for inducing hypnosis, one that stands out to me is the overload method. To understand this method think main stream media and how they report the news, it seems nowadays every report is read as though it were a breaking emergency. The reporters speak in a heightened tone with force, and a sense of urgency, bombarding us in an overwhelming way. Strangely this is one of the same methods hypnotists use.


    While advancements in science have taught us how the brain and mind work, it has also opened the door to a deeper understanding of how to better manipulate them.


    Here are a few examples from random descriptions online talking about the overload method for hypnosis.


    “Psychologists have found that that most people's short-term memories can store 7 (plus or minus 2) chunks of information at any given time.


    When you give your clients more than this to think about, you may find that they find a natural release from this 'information overload' by exhibiting a trance-like state.


    This Overload Induction has been used successfully with thousands of clients to help them to enter easily into hypnosis.


    The script encourages clients' participation and includes a deepening visualization to prepare your clients for the next stage of therapy”. https://www.hypnoticworld.com/hypnos...ction-overload


    “Hypnosis is created by an overload of message units, disorganizing our inhibitory process (Critical Mind), triggering our fight/flight mechanism and ultimately creating a hypersuggestible state, providing access to the subconscious mind”. https://hypnosis.edu/distance/founda...orkbook/v1.pdf


    “The hypnotist bombards a subjects with strong, forceful and convincing commands that overload the subject’s mind. Eventually, the subject gives up his or her conscious control over the situation”. https://www.getdoc.com/hypnosis-brain-harmful/


    To see an example of how this works you only need to turn on the main stream news, it wont be long before you are bombarded with an overwhelming barrage of information read in a forceful way.




    The uses and abuses of hypnosis, Ivan Tyrrell warns that hypnosis is a powerful tool that must be used with care, understanding and integrity.:


    “Conditioning


    As a form of learning, this inevitably involves the REM state and, one way or another, hypnosis is practised by all cults and political parties. For example, the use by politicians of abstract hypnotic words like ‘positive change’, ‘values’ or ‘principles’, force people into an internal trance to search for what they understand as the meaning of these words, even though the politicians give no concrete examples. (Everyone wants to change something in their life. And no individual wants negative change. So when a politician uses words like change or progressive it is a con trick.)


    Anyone who thinks hypnosis is harmless might do well to remember that Hitler studied it after being cured by a hypnotist of the hysterical blindness that he suffered at the end of the First World War. His personality changed at that point as the result of a strong suggestion given in trance by a psychologist who told him that he was special and that he had great personal powers and that, with these great powers, he could cure himself of the blindness. This acted as a post hypnotic suggestion and Hitler went on to induce receptive trance states in vast crowds at rallies, bombarding them with emotionally arousing nominalisations. He even adopted a stylised form of arm levitation as the Nazi salute.


    Damaging a person’s very essence


    When we use hypnotic techniques to help someone access the REM state, we are tapping into that individual’s unique ‘essence’, the life force programmed into them after conception that then awaits certain influences – as a spark awaits wind for it to fan into flame – so that it may grow and develop and thus continue the evolutionary process. A hypnotic induction is, in fact, a form of trespass upon the private mental territory of another’s essence. This is territory that we should only enter respectfully if invited in, and we must be careful to close the gate properly when we leave. Using hypnosis repeatedly with an individual is ultimately weakening to them, because it can put out the spark of volition by making them increasingly open to suggestion, and not only to the suggestions of their therapist. That is one reason that therapy should be as brief as possible.


    “The aim of therapy is to help people detach and cope alone, not become dependent. Extreme cases of repeated hypnosis can even eventually derange the brain, as when ordinary people start behaving in grotesque ways and think of others not as humans but as ‘things’. When the self-righteous behead people who don’t share their religion or think it is acceptable to rape, torture and kill people – it is certain that they have been hypnotised by the use of emotional arousal through fear, chanting, repetition, or other means, to make them become highly suggestible. All dangerous mass movements involve hypnosis and the programming of people, once they are emotionally aroused”.
    https://www.hgi.org.uk/resources/del...buses-hypnosis
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  14. #9
    Points: 84,798, Level: 70
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 52
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    27584
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    11,128
    Points
    84,798
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    14,094
    Thanked 9,553x in 5,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    6 of 13

    If you do a simple web search on brainwashing, you will find it reads just like an outline for what we went thorough during the pandemic. Different outlines vary in tactics, but they all read like the pandemic in their own way.


    “Isolation
    1. Attacks on self-esteem
    2. Us vs. Them
    3. Blind obedience
    4. Testing


    Isolation:


    The first step towards brainwashing begins with isolation because having friends and family around you is dangerous to them.




    Attacks on self-esteem:


    A person who wants to brainwash another can only do so if their victim is in a vulnerable state and has low self-confidence. A broken person is much easier to rebuild with the brainwasher’s beliefs.




    Us vs. Them:


    In order to break a person down and reshape them in a different image, an alternative way of living must be introduced that is far more attractive than their present one. This is usually achieved by the victim only mixing with other people who have been brainwashed and will, therefore, praise the new regime. Or it could be that everyone wears a kind of uniform, have a set diet or other rigid rules that encourage a group dynamic.




    Blind obedience:


    The end goal for a brainwasher is blind obedience, where the victim follows orders without question. This is usually achieved by positively rewarding the person when they please the brainwasher and negative punishing them when they do not.


    Testing:


    A brainwasher can never think that his or her work is done, as there are always scenarios where the victim could start to regain their own autonomy and start thinking for themselves again. Testing their victims not only shows that they are still brainwashed, it allows the brainwashers to see just how much control they still have over their victims. Tests could include committing a criminal act, such as robbing a store or burglarizing a home.” https://www.learning-mind.com/brainwashing-signs/


    Certainly the vaccine could be a double as a test to see how many are still on board. Just a thought.


    Effects of Torture:


    “Is Isolation a Form of Torture? U.N. Expert Says It Is: A lengthy solitary confinement can cause serious mental and physical damage and be considered torture”. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/is-is...f-to_b_1234420


    In this next article included in the psychological torture are Shaming, Isolation, Mock executions, Fear, Alienation to destroy self esteem, and Propaganda.
    “The 15 Craziest Forms of Psychological Torture: Sometimes called “no touch torture,” psychological torture is an insidious form of torture that is meant to degrade, humiliate and eventually dehumanize victims. It’s different from physical torture in that it focuses on the mind rather than the body. But don’t let that fool you into thinking it’s not as bad. Although you won’t have physical injuries, the mental damage you’ll receive can have lasting effects”. https://www.therichest.com/shocking/...gical-torture/


    “Torture can affect the brain, leaving long-term psychological scars: The Senate torture report released earlier this month describes how the CIA’s harsh interrogation program sought to make detainees passive and powerless to resist, using techniques from sleep deprivation to stress positions to waterboarding to induce a state that psychologists call “learned helplessness.” ”Compliant”.”


    “post-traumatic stress disorder, other anxiety disorders, depression, enduring personality changes.”


    “What happens in the brain? Clues come from studies of things like memory formation and stress — not torture — in animals. For example, repeated moderately stressful experiences, such as restraining a rat’s movements over a period of time, can physically alter structures that control fear and anxiety, said neuroscientist Bruce McEwen of Rockefeller University.


    While some changes are reversible, “the brain is never the same as it was before,” said McEwen”.


    “Physical torture can affect the brain, too. But by itself, “psychological torture undermines the very ability to think, and it doesn’t leave any marks”.


    “In 2005, a CIA psychologist wrote that al-Shibh had “remained in social isolation” for 2½ years and was having “alarming” psychological deterioration, including visions, paranoia, insomnia and attempts at self-harm. He was transferred to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and placed on anti-psychotic medications.


    Longer-term disorders such as PTSD involve flashbacks and nightmares stemming from how the brain processes traumatic situations.


    “It’s clear that fear-related memories are deeply embedded,” said Rockefeller’s McEwen”. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/...ological-scars


    Isolation Has Profound Effects on The Human Body And Brain: There are countless negative effects that social isolation and extreme isolation can have on our minds and bodies. Alati was no exception, reporting that he experienced a range of side effects, including changes to his sleep cycle, and hallucinations.


    But why is isolation so difficult for humans to withstand?


    One of the reasons that living in isolation is difficult is because humans are social creatures”.


    “ Loneliness can be damaging to both our mental and physical health. Socially isolated people are less able to deal with stressful situations.


    They're also more likely to feel depressed and may have problems processing information. This in turn can lead to difficulties with decision-making and memory storage and recall.


    People who are lonely are also more susceptible to illness. Researchers found that a lonely person's immune system responds differently to fighting viruses, making them more likely to develop an illness.


    The impacts of social isolation become worse when people are placed in physically isolating environments. For example, solitary confinement can have negative psychological effects on prisoners – including significant increases in anxiety and panic attacks, increased levels of paranoia, and being less able to think clearly.


    Many prisoners also report long-term mental health problems after being held in isolation”. https://www.sciencealert.com/isolati...s-what-happens


    “Total Isolation may increase morbidity due to chronic illness and higher all-cause mortality”. https://healthmed.org/the-negative-e...ysical-health/




    “Suddenly Having Vivid Dreams: In the past year there has been a something unusual taking place on Google’s search engine keywords.


    All of a sudden people are experiencing an increase amount of weird vivid dreams that are leaving them confused and wondering how to stop them.


    While scientists have been studying dreams for years, something else that you are unaware of could be triggering an onset of vivid dreams”.


    “#1. Increased Stress or anxiety


    People who have stress and anxiety over long periods of time may experience negative related health outcomes. Unfortunately these negative emotions seem to be rearing its ugly head in our dreams. Uncontrolled stress and anxiety is one of the leading causes of an increase of vivid dreams”.


    “#2. Psychological impact of covid 19


    As the coronavirus pandemic rapidly sweeps across the world, it is inducing a considerable degree of fear and anxiety. According to APA changes in personality such as tiredness, depression, withdrawal, irritability, frustration or anxiety. Alternatively this will affect a person sleep habits, dreaming, vivid dreams and an increase of nightmares”. https://www.dreamdictionary.org/slee...-vivid-dreams/


    “People around the world may be physically separated in pandemic lockdowns, but they are joined in at least one way — many are experiencing vivid and bizarre coronavirus dreams”. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/menta...reams-n1188901


    Other Forms of Mind Manipulation


    Darpa has long been known for working on mind control. In the article below, I will include a few excerpts from a whistle blower leak on a study that used magnetic stimulation along with propaganda to brain wash subjects, and modify the brain. The study then evolves to not using magnetic stimulation at all, achieving the same effect by using messages that only target specific parts of the brain. Keep in mind this article is from 2013, we have come a long way since then. I highly recommend you read the PDF’s at the end of the article, they are bombshell.


    “What if the government could change people’s moral beliefs or stop political dissent through remote control of people’s brains?


    Sounds like science fiction, right? Well, a leaked document reveals that the US government, through DARPA research, is very close to accomplishing this.


    Activist Post was recently contacted by an anonymous whistleblower who worked on a secret ongoing mind-control project for DARPA. The aim of the program is to remotely disrupt political dissent and extremism by employing “Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation” (TMS) in tandem with sophisticated propaganda based on this technology. TMS stimulates the temporal lobe of the brain with electromagnetic fields.


    The program, conducted by The Center for Strategic Communication, is based at Arizona State University. The DARPA funding for this project can be confirmed on the ASU website here. The head of the project, Steve Corman, has worked extensively in the area of strategic communication as it applies to terrorism and “extremism” – or what could be called “the war of ideas.”


    Once the research group determines which parts of the brain are associated with cognitive reasoning and narrative comprehension, they will be attempt to impair those sections in order to “create a fundamental basis for understanding how to disrupt or enhance aspects of narrative structure and/or brain functioning to minimize or maximize persuasive effects on subject proclivity to engage in political violence.” (Page 23)


    Once it is determined that disruption of certain portions of the brain can enhance persuasive messaging, individuals can be persuaded to do things they normally would not do and believe things they normally would not believe.


    Further, and perhaps even more terrifying, on page 40, the group writes, “Mechanical disruptions of narrative processing may be, ultimately, replicated in through targeted strategic communication campaigns that approximate the narrative disruptions induced via magnetic stimulation.” So, after figuring out which parts of the brain are activated by particular persuasive messages and propaganda, the government can test out messages that only activate particular portions of the brain and not others, in order to persuade individuals to believe or not believe something. Essentially, they are attempting to modify brain functioning without TMS, and only words. One can only imagine the strategies the government could use with this technology. They could make the public believe almost anything that suits their needs. It could literally lead to mass brainwashing”. https://www.activistpost.com/2013/07...l-project.html


    If you want to go further down the rabbit hole of possibilities I suggest this next article from 1998, called “The Mind has no firewall”.


    “The human body, much like a computer, contains myriad data processors. They include, but are not limited to, the chemical-electrical activity of the brain, heart, and peripheral nervous system, the signals sent from the cortex region of the brain to other parts of our body, the tiny hair cells in the inner ear that process auditory signals, and the light-sensitive retina and cornea of the eye that process visual activity.[2] We are on the threshold of an era in which these data processors of the human body may be manipulated or debilitated”. https://ce399.wordpress.com/2009/12/...-college-1998/


    We could certainly go deeper on this subject, but I will leave it here.


    Vaccines


    It’s hard not to notice that wherever these covid vaccines were rolled out cases and deaths seemed to skyrocket. It’s not a conspiracy to state the facts. We use facts to quantify reality, and calculate probabilities, it’s science. We have been told by our authorities to disregard science, facts, and reason, and to instead place our trust in what we are told the facts are, even if those narratives are not backed by anything we can find in reality.


    “The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the dependent variables total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policy makers. They indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment”. https://www.researchgate.net/publica..._145_Countries


    “As noted by other authors Pacheco-Barrios et al. 2020, many countries that reported high cases and deaths associated with COVID-19 during 2020 and early 2021 showed a standard example of Farr’s Law and/or the Gompertz Function when viewed cumulatively per capita as an inverse Gompertz function Haynes and Kulkarni 2021, or when predicted as a “best straight line” Levitt, Scaiewicz and Zonta 2020. In other words, these countries appeared to have largely achieved natural immunity by late spring of 2021 in the Northern Hemisphere, which is why many of their trend lines go flat for a time. Unfortunately, once the vaccine administration started for the general population, or shortly thereafter, those trend lines began to increase again in many countries, and unnaturally so in the middle or towards the end of summer in the Northern hemisphere or in countries where previously there had been very few if any cases or deaths. Normally, seasonal die off from pneumonia, influenza, or COVID-19 is in the winter, so this spike that appears in many countries after vaccine administration at this time of the year or in countries with no previous outbreaks is highly suspect as not being a natural trend, but rather vaccine-induced”. https://vector-news.github.io/editor...port_html.html


    “RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL – A new scientific study of 145 of the most Covid-19 vaccinated countries globally has found a significant increase in transmission and death after the jabs were introduced.


    The 99-page study, which was called “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with Covid-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries,” found that in the United States alone, the coronavirus jab has caused a staggering 38% more Covid cases per million. On top of that, the Covid-19 shot has caused a 31% increase in deaths per million. The researchers who carried out the study found that almost 90% (89.84%) of the 145 countries experienced this negative effect after the Covid-19 jabs were made available”. https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazi...-0-gaNycGzNB30


    United States: March 29 2022 FDA authorizes Boosters for those over 50 or at risk groups. https://www.factcheck.org/2022/04/sc...-older-people/ Cases in the US had fallen and were under 40,000 per day. After the booster Roll out, by May 2022 cases have doubled passing 80,000 per day. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/


    We are told the vaccines are “safe and effective”, that phrase has been on continuous repeat since the roll out. If a person is sickened after getting vaccinated and they speak out, they are called an antivaxxer and attacked. Doctors who speak up are slandered and threatened. We are only allowed to hear good things and anything negative regarding the vaccines is to be immediately discarded, and if we hear something that goes against the narrative, we are to ignore it, and pretend it is a lie or not real. If someone says something negative they must be crazy, a liar, or a conspiracy theorist.


    In the US alone there have been 28,312 reports of death from the vaccine. https://openvaers.com/covid-data


    Because of censorship we aren’t allowed to even hear about these deaths, or of the thousands who have become disabled after taking the vaccine. These people who got sick or died were not antivaxxers as we are told, they took the vaccine, this means they were provax. We are told to disregard them as antivaxxers. It is as though people go blank in a trance and hear nothing at all, the only thing they know is, “safe and effective”.


    Coinciding with the vaccine roll outs morticians began to notice an uptick in deaths, and strange fiberous clots in patients. Many in the industry were noticing these trends but were afraid to speak up.


    “Board-certified funeral directors and embalmers are coming forward to tell tales of horror featuring vaccinated bodies with veins and arteries clogged with strange, rubbery, worm-like clots.


    Richard Hirschman, a funeral director and embalmer from Alabama, with over twenty years of experience in the field, has said in recent interviews that he had never seen anything like it until around the middle of 2021, after the mass injections of the experimental COVID vaccines began. He says his colleagues in the field are seeing the same thing, and the numbers are increasing”.


    “Hirschman told Horowitz that he’s discussed the phenomenon with 15 of his colleagues, and every one of them has seen same things he has, but they are afraid to speak out publicly”.


    “He also noted that he has only seen the strange clots in one unvaccinated case—in a person who had received a blood transfusion—the implications of which are terrifying”.


    “Funeral director John O’Looney of Milton Keynes, England, is also blowing the whistle on the alarming increase in number of thrombosis deaths. O’Looney said in an interview that it’s not just “a two or three-fold increase—it’s around a 500 or 600 percent increase,” and nine out of ten of these cases were vaccinated.


    “I’ve got doctors and police ringing me, nurses ringing me, all saying the same thing. It’s a total lie. On our media, they are saying the hospitals are full of the non-vaccinated. That’s a total fabrication. It’s the polar opposite. Nine out of ten patients in there, full of blood clots, are the vaccinated”. https://tennesseestar.com/2022/02/21...inated-bodies/


    I feel this is a major part of the issue, Self Censorship. So many people were afraid to speak up, so they remained silent while millions died. The media was so effective at dividing the public, and causing them to attack anyone who didn’t follow the narrative. The threats against anyone who stepped out of line were all to real. You could lose everything you worked for, just for speaking about about seeing something that was real, and actually happening. Social pressure became a weapon silencing the masses.


    This self censorship was far reaching. It wasn’t just the medical professionals we depend upon who were not reporting what they were actually witnessing. The masses in general were self censoring, afraid to say what they really felt. People withheld opinions during conversations, and in online videos, they wouldn't say key words like vaccine or Ivermectin out of fear of censorship or demonetization. But there is no need to fear being censored, when we are already censoring ourselves. It is because of this mass mindset that it was able to take place.


    Something else I find shocking is how doctors and nurses were finding things in the vaccines that simply shouldn’t be there, and the few who did speak up about it were attacked and slandered. Facts are facts, if you look under a microscope and see something in a vaccine that is not supposed to be there, you aren’t a conspiracy theorist just because you spoke up about it. Again the public depends on those who are in the medical and scientific field to speak up if they see something. Civilians don’t have the capability to look into these matters, it rests in the hands of those with proper equipment and knowledge to look into these matters and speak up on behalf of the public. If you don’t tell us, we wont know.


    International research groups find tiny sharp metal objects in Covid vaccines: ‘Very frightening’


    “Two renowned German pathologists, Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt and Prof. Dr. Walter Lang confirmed the content of Prof. Dr. Peter Schirmacher’s report on the links found in autopsies between the Covid vaccine and the increasing number of deaths in vaccinated individuals.


    Prof. Peter Schirmacher, M.D., director of autopsy services, found a causal link to vaccination in one-third of the deaths within 14 days of Covid-19 vaccination.


    At their press conference, pathologists stressed that the situation was alarming.


    The groups studied hundreds of vaccine bottles from Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca. “What they discovered is shocking,” Dr. Jane Ruby said on the Stew Peters Show.


    The research groups stumbled upon countless tiny sharp metal objects, parasites, and all sorts of strange substances that they could not place at home and had never seen before. “Things that don’t belong in a vaccine,” Ruby said”. https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazi...y-frightening/


    Why should this be regarded as a mentally ill conspiracy theory when we know Japan refused a vaccine shipment because it was contaminated with metal?


    “Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare suspended the use of more than 1.6 million doses of Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine Thursday following reports of contaminated vials at multiple vaccination sites there.


    Takeda Pharmaceuticals, which distributes the vaccine in Japan for Moderna, said it notified the ministry after several vaccination sites reported an unspecified foreign object found in one specific lot”. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/26/japa...concerns-.html


    So it’s not conspiracy when Japan comes out and says it, but when an individual doctor says it, then it’s a conspiracy. Now let us use some common sense, if the VAERS death and side effect reports are fake or unreliable, then I wonder why the reports stem from specific batches, just like what happened in Japan, they said, the foreign objects were found in one specific lot? Well same goes for all the deaths and side effects from the Covid Vaccines. They come from specific lots.




    EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data


    “An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.


    But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations”. https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/10/31/10...ches-produced/


    It’s no surprise to me that the smartest people among us were part of the largest group who chose to not get vaccinated. You have to be someone who can think for yourself, be a critical thinker, and not be susceptible to peer pressure, mass propaganda, and persuasion.


    “People with a PhD are the most hesitant when it comes to getting the Covid-19 vaccine, according to a paper by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh”. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/am...vid/ar-AANjRHh


    It used to be that a few times per year a famous person would die, and you would see it on main stream media, but in the last few years it has changed. Now on some days there is a daily list of famous people who have died. Deaths are clearly increasing. The CDC blames it on Covid, stating the excess mortality is due to covid either directly or indirectly.


    In the US in 2018 there were 2,839,205 deaths, in 2019 there were 2,854,838 that is an increase of 15,633 deaths, that includes the deaths from the beginnings of the pandemic, it is thought Covid was in the US earlier than thought.


    "SARS-CoV-2 infections may have been present in the U.S. in December 2019, earlier than previously recognized," https://www.npr.org/sections/coronav...own-study-says


    “A surge in hospital visits and internet searches related to COVID-19 symptoms from the Chinese city of Wuhan suggests the coronavirus may have been circulating since August 2019, according to a preliminary study by researchers at Boston University and Harvard”. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-...ed-summer.html


    “BOSTON — When and where the coronavirus came to the United States can tell us a lot about how to beat it.


    “There’s a lot interest in where the virus started so we can prevent again in the future,” said Dr. C. Michael Gibson, a Harvard University professor and doctor at Beth Israel Deaconess.


    There’s a consensus the virus started in China, and there are theories it may have come to the U.S. in November and December.


    Many on social media have been posting that they had similar symptoms in the fall, and a recent USA Today article addresses this issue head on.


    Gibson said that is possible, but not likely”. https://www.boston25news.com/news/di...MEI7JFP6W25XU/


    In 2020 there were 3,378,414 deaths. an increase of 523,576 deaths. There were 385,000 covid deaths in 2020 which that means that besides covid there was an increase of 138,576 deaths.


    In Dec 2020 we began the vaccination campaign, In 2020 the vaccination campaign was in full swing with nearly 50% of the population taking the plunge. Interestingly the deaths didn’t decrease, instead they increased. In 2021 there were 3,385,364 deaths, and increase of 6,950 deaths from the prior year. In 2021 there were 415,000 deaths due to Covid. In a population where 50% are vaccinated with a safe and effective vaccine, there was in increase in Covid deaths. There was an increase of 30,000 Covid deaths from the prior year. Not only did the vaccine roll out not lower covid deaths, instead the deaths increased.


    We all know the statistics, younger people have a much lower risk of death from Covid.


    Younger people have a much lower risk of death from Covid. As per the CDC, “Compared with 18- to 29-year-olds, the rate of death is four times higher in 30- to 39-year-olds, and 340 times higher in those who are 85 years and older”. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...th-by-age.html


    “patients above the age of 80 were at least 20 times likelier to die from Covid-19 than patients in their 50s, and hundreds of times likelier to die from Covid-19 than patients younger than 40”. https://www.advisory.com/daily-brief.../13/covid-risk


    Strangely the people who were dying in our new vaccinated world were not just the at risk age group, it was the younger people who made up the excess deaths. According to Insurance group One America, deaths are up by 40% over pre-pandemic levels.


    “Davison said that his company is seeing the highest death rates now than he’s ever seen before since he started in the insurance business.


    OneAmerica offers employers across the country group life insurance, which generally covers people 18 to 64-years-old.


    Even more alarming is where those death rates are hitting, with Davison saying it’s primarily among working aged people between the ages of 18 and 64 who are covered by OneAmerica’s group life policies. The insurance company says that’s similar to what the rest of the group life industry is seeing and is consistent with CDC data”.


    “To illustrate just how severe the current death rate is, Davison said a 1 in 200-year catastrophe would likely only cause a 10 percent increase over pre-pandemic deaths”. https://thehill.com/changing-america...cent-over-pre/


    The CDC blames covid for the excess deaths, but when you look at the statistics something doesn’t add up. The excess deaths are coming from the group that does not have the highest risk. Those pushing the vaccines are not willing to consider for even a moment that they could possibly be the culprit. We aren’t allowed to even question it. Questioning the vaccine is against the rules.

    Without any proof at all the media asks us to ignore the death reports with headlines like these.


    “Scary Reports of Deaths Following COVID-19 Vaccination Aren’t What They Seem”. You might have seen the headlines on social media.


    “COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Fatalities Exceed 6,000.”


    “6,000% Increase in Reported Vaccine Deaths 1st Quarter 2021 Compared to 1st Quarter 2020.”


    No matter your vaccination status or your feelings about getting the shot, those headlines likely give you pause. Can those numbers be right?


    These and similar shocking claims are the latest examples of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. And as with most misinformation, these statements get traction because they start with a kernel of truth — in this case raw data from a reputable source”. https://www.muhealth.org/our-stories...what-they-seem


    That same article goes on to say this, “Meanwhile, what we do know for sure is that more than 58 million U.S. residents have been infected and more than 800,000 have died from COVID-19, and the vaccine is one of the best tools to slow the spread of the virus and save lives”.


    Well if that really is the case then why did covid cases and deaths drastically increase once 50% of the population were vaccinated, rather than decrease? In hindsight it seems that articles like this were the real misinformation, the vaccines did not slow the spread or decrease deaths.


    We were told the vaccinated could not spread covid, anyone who said otherwise was accused of spreading misinformation. Then later it was found that the vaccinated could spread it just as easily and that in fact the vaccine was leaky, rather than ending the pandemic it would keep it going, and make the virus more dangerous.


    “Joe Biden said in July that if you get vaccinated, you will not get COVID” https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...-not-get-covid


    "This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated," Biden said in the full interview. "The unvaccinated. Not the vaccinated, the unvaccinated. That’s the problem. Everybody talks about freedom and not to have a shot or have a test. Well guess what? How about patriotism? How about making sure that you’re vaccinated, so you do not spread the disease to anyone else." https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...ead-covid-19-/


    “The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in a new interview celebrated data suggesting that those who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 largely "do not carry the virus."


    CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow on Monday that "our data from the CDC today suggests that vaccinated people do not carry the virus" or get sick”. https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-director-...185100232.html


    Then the truth began to surface.


    “Viral Loads Similar Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated People. A new study from the University of California, Davis, Genome Center, UC San Francisco and the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub shows no significant difference in viral load between vaccinated and unvaccinated people who tested positive for the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. It also found no significant difference between infected people with or without symptoms”. https://www.ucdavis.edu/health/covid...cinated-people


    “We found no significant difference in cycle threshold values between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic groups infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta”. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....28.21264262v1




    “Fully vaccinated adults can carry the same amount of coronavirus as those who are unvaccinated, according to a new study”. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...ted/ar-AANuNXh




    “Scientists have discovered that fully vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the viral load of Covid in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated. The researchers, who detailed their findings in a paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, found that while the jab moderates symptoms of infection, it also allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into pre-symptomatic superspreaders”. https://peckford42.wordpress.com/202...-unvaccinated/


    In May of 2021, the CDC told the vaccinated that they no longer needed to wear masks, yet they were the ones who possibly had the highest viral loads. A study had just shown the vaccinated to have 251 times the viral load of the unvaccinated. Yet, the unvaccinated were being called a danger and a threat to the health of everyone, while it was the vaccinated who were potentially the ones spreading the virus. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....act_id=3897733


    “CDC says fully vaccinated people don’t need to wear face masks indoors or outdoors in most settings. Fully vaccinated people no longer need to wear a face mask or stay 6 feet away from others in most settings, whether outdoors or indoors, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in updated public health guidance released Thursday”. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/cdc-...-settings.html


    “Covid Surges In 4 Of 5 Most Vaccinated Countries”. https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberth...h=4010d12cd677




    (Israel) Prof. Jacob Giris, director of Ichilov Hospital’s coronavirus ward, said in a TV interview that many of the severe cases are vaccinated.


    “Right now, most of our severe cases are vaccinated,” Giris told Channel 13 News. “They had at least three injections. Between seventy and eighty percent of the serious cases are vaccinated. So, the vaccine has no significance regarding severe illness, which is why just twenty to twenty-five percent of our patients are unvaccinated.” https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/321674
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  15. #10
    Points: 84,798, Level: 70
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 52
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    27584
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    11,128
    Points
    84,798
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    14,094
    Thanked 9,553x in 5,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    7 of 13

    “Latest UK Data: Vaccinated People 3-times More Likely To Die From Delta Variant Than Unvaccinated”. https://newsrescue.com/latest-uk-dat...-unvaccinated/




    “In Gibraltar, 100% of adults are fully vaccinated against Covid-19 and yet new cases are exploding. The increase in cases, described by the government as “exponential,” comes despite Gibraltar having the highest vaccination rate in the world”. https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazi...are-exploding/




    “A growing percentage of Americans dying from covid-19 are vaccinated. A growing share of the pandemic's victims are vaccinated, as covid-19 deaths grow among the oldest Americans”. https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...re-vaccinated/


    “Covid deaths no longer overwhelmingly among unvaccinated as toll on elderly grows. WASHINGTON -- Unvaccinated people accounted for the overwhelming majority of deaths in the United States throughout much of the coronavirus pandemic. But that has changed in recent months, according to a Washington Post analysis of state and federal data”. https://news.yahoo.com/covid-deaths-...k=tw&tsrc=twtr


    “More vaccinated than unvaccinated Britons are now dying from the coronavirus”. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-...ronavirus.html


    Whistleblower: FDA and CDC Ignore Damning Report that over 90% of a Hospital’s Admissions were Vaccinated for Covid-19 and No One Was Reporting This to VAERS: “As Ms. Conrad has detailed, her hospital serves a community in which less than 50% of the individuals were vaccinated for Covid-19 but yet, during the same time period, approximately 90% of the individuals admitted to her hospital were documented to have received this vaccine”. https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/whi...ignore-3e2?s=r


    “Jodi O’Malley, a nurse working for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, reveals health officials are ignoring and covering up COVID-19 vaccine injuries.


    O’Malley says she’s seen “dozens of people come in with adverse reactions,” including myocarditis, congestive heart failure and deaths, yet the reactions are not being reported. This, despite the fact that both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention require any suspected injury from an emergency use vaccine to be reported.


    “If everyone is supposed to gather this data and report it, but no one is reporting it, how will anyone know the vaccine is truly safe? They don’t,” O’Malley says.


    One of the reasons O’Malley decided to come forward, knowing she will likely lose her job over it, is because one of her coworkers who was coerced into taking the shot died. “Nobody should have to decide between their livelihood or take the vaccine,” O’Malley says.


    She also points out that while there are medications such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine that have been shown to be safe and effective against the virus, the HHS will terminate anyone who uses these drugs”. https://theparadise.ng/covid-jab-inj...orror-stories/




    Four times more vaccinated people are dying than the unvaccinated.


    (UK) For every one “unvaccinated” person, there are at least four “vaccinated” people who die with Covid. Alternatively, 82% of Covid deaths are post-Covid injection – far from 90% protection against mortality, rather it is almost as if the opposite is true.


    Below the table, on page 21, there is a footnote which attempts to make an excuse for the high mortality of the “vaccinated”: “even with a highly effective vaccine, it is expected that a large proportion of cases, hospitalisations and deaths would occur in vaccinated individuals, simply because a larger proportion of the population are vaccinated than unvaccinated and no vaccine is 100% effective.”


    Does the real-world data support UKHSA’s assumption that it is reasonable for more “vaccinated” people to be dying with Covid than “unvaccinated”? Not according to ONS data. Deaths dramatically increased, above the five year average, two months after the Covid injection campaign was launched. https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/17/co...isinformation/




    “Why most people who now die with Covid in England have had a vaccination. Don’t think of this as a bad sign, it’s exactly what’s expected from an effective but imperfect jab”. https://www.theguardian.com/theobser...een-vaccinated


    “Families of people who died after taking Covid vaccine ‘ignored’ as zero compensation payouts made”. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/h...-b2064875.html


    “Children are dying at a rate 62% higher than the 5-year-average since they began to be given the Covid-19 Vaccine”. https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/10/28/ch...ination-began/


    “Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine increases Children’s risk of Death by 5100% according to the Office for National Statistics: “The data showed a massive increase in deaths among single-vaccinated and double-vaccinated children compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. For children aged 15 to 19, the risk of death increases by 82% following the first shot, and a shocking 226% following the second shot.


    But things are much worse for 10 to 14-year-olds. The risk of dying increases by a mind-blowing 885% following the first shot, and then an earth shattering 5105% following the second dose”. https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/07/co...KQHZAmoe84sBjo


    Dr Mike Yeadon warned in early 2021 that children are 50 times more likely to get killed by the vaccine than by the virus itself.


    The former vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory at Pfizer, stressed that the vaccines used against Covid-19 have not been sufficiently tested and that they shouldn’t have received emergency use authorisation when there are safe and effective medicines available for COVID-19.


    Yeadon explained that the mRNA gene technology used in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine to trigger the body to create viral spike proteins is a “fundamental problem” that scientists and researchers have known about for years. According to Yeadon, those spike proteins can lead to blood clots and other health problems.


    Yeadon also said that young people are not susceptible to Covid-19, and “it’s a crazy thing to vaccinate them with something that is actually 50 times more likely to kill them than the virus itself.”


    With official ONS data now showing children are 52 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, it looks like Dr Mike Yeadon underestimated the true damage these experimental Covid-19 injections were about to cause”. https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/07/co...KQHZAmoe84sBjo


    “In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines excludes them as positive contributors to public health, even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic”. https://www.authorea.com/users/45559...-and-micrornas


    “A recent study published on January 25, 2022, on JAMA Network, has shown that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133 times greater than the background risk in the population”. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/321238


    SARS-CoV-2 vaccination can elicit a CD8 T-cell dominant hepatitis: “Liver inflammation is observed during SARS-CoV-2 infection but can also occur in some individuals after vaccination and shares some typical features with autoimmune liver disease. In this report, we show that highly activated T cells accumulate and are evenly distributed in the different areas of the liver in a patient with liver inflammation following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination”. https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...68827822002343


    “Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Goes Into Liver Cells and Is Converted to DNA: Study:


    The messenger RNA (mRNA) from Pfizer’s COVID-19vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and is converted into DNA, according to Swedish researchers at Lund University.


    The researchers found that when the mRNA vaccine enters the human liver cells, it triggers the cell’s DNA, which is inside the nucleus, to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA.


    The mRNA then leaves the nucleus and enters the cell’s cytoplasm, where it translates into LINE-1 protein. A segment of the protein called the open reading frame-1, or ORF-1, then goes back into the nucleus, where it attaches to the vaccine’s mRNA and reverse transcribes into spike DNA.


    The whole process occurred rapidly within six hours. The vaccine’s mRNA converting into DNA and being found inside the cell’s nucleus is something that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said would not happen.


    “The genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells,” the CDC said on its web page titled “Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines.”


    This is the first time that researchers have shown in vitro or inside a petri dish how an mRNA vaccine is converted into DNA on a human liver cell line, and is what health experts and fact-checkers said for over a year couldn’t occur.


    The CDC says that the “COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way,” claiming that all of the ingredients in both mRNA and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines (administered in the United States) are discarded from the body once antibodies are produced. These vaccines deliver genetic material that instructs cells to begin making spike proteins found on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 that causes COVID-19 to produce an immune response.


    Pfizer didn’t comment on the findings of the Swedish study and said only that its mRNA vaccine does not alter the human genome”. https://peckford42.wordpress.com/202...-to-dna-study/


    “Our study is the first in vitro study on the effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2
    on human liver cell line. We present evidence on fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and
    subsequent intracellular reverse transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA”. https://thevaultproject.org/wp-conte...A-into-DNA.pdf




    Many People Fully Vaccinated for COVID Are Now Going Blind: “We have heard all about the many cases of myocarditis and pericarditis post-injection, as well as recipients repeatedly testing “positive” for the virus even after doing the deed. But there is another concerning side effect occurring in the “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) that is rarely mentioned: blindness”. https://www.globalresearch.ca/many-p...-blind/5778951


    We were told vaccines would stay at the injection site.


    “Vaccines mostly remain near the site of injection (the arm muscle) and local lymph nodes”. https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/wh...ke-proteins-go


    We found out this wasn’t the case. Judicial Watch obtained records showing that the vaccine did in fact travel in the body, with high concentrations in the liver, and could be found in animal tests months later. Which tells us they already knew it didn’t stay at the injection site. Not only that but that the safety of the Lipid Nano particles were not tested for carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, safety pharmacology, or pharmacodynamic drug interactions. These tests were deemed unnecessary based on a WHO guideline. https://www.judicialwatch.org/nanopa...ress%20release


    We were told the vaccines were safe and effective, how can we know if they are safe if the safety tests weren’t conducted? Strangely we see a rise in hepatitis, and here the documents provided by Judicial Watch clearly show the liquid nanoparticles (LPN) accumulate in the liver. We have women reporting abnormal menstruation, and we see in the documents the LNP’s are found in the ovaries. Physicians are reporting a rise in cancer among the vaccinated, and we see that they did not test for carcinogenicity, they deemed it unnecessary. How can they mandate a vaccine that they have not fully tested? How can they mandate something when they are withholding known risks, mortality rates, and trying to block the records from coming out for 75 years? Not just mandate, how could they administer it at all?


    I could easily keep going, link after link, study after study. I will close out this section on vaccines. If I were to keep going there would be no end. If you listen to the main stream media you will not hear about these studies, deaths, or side effects happening in the world population, you will only hear that the vaccine is safe and effective. And if anyone says otherwise they have a mental illness, are a conspiracy theorist, or an antivaxxer.


    I will wrap this section up with an unrelated event, however it is a vaccine event, and an example that should not go ignored.


    In Denver hundreds of horses were rounded up, and mysteriously, 95 horses died in under a week. The cause was from a respiratory virus. The virus did not spread through them until after they were vaccinated. However, that is not what is being reported in the media.


    “An outbreak of an undetermined and highly contagious disease has killed dozens of wild horses at a federal holding facility in southern Colorado”. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/67-hors...lity-colorado/


    “Equine virus identified in deaths of wild captive horses in Colorado: DENVER, April 28 (Reuters) - Laboratory tests have pinpointed the equine virus suspected of triggering an outbreak of a respiratory illness that has killed at least 95 captive wild horses in less than a week at a federal corral in Colorado, U.S. government officials said on Thursday”. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/equ...source=twitter


    “The first horses to get severely ill were among a group of about 50 that were vaccinated five to ten days before the illness began.


    As to whether there was a problem with the vaccine, Hall said, “It’s hard to say and that again will be one of those answers we might have more definitive information on in a week or so.”


    On the vaccine question, he said, “The timing of the vaccination is something that we’re reviewing as we take a look at how we got to where we’re at.” https://denver.cbslocal.com/2022/04/...en-vaccinated/





    Deception & Loss of freedom


    Now I would like to take a trip back and forward through time again to point out a few key actions by Presidents that seem to tie into an overall agenda.


    Presidents Bush Sr. and Jr.


    The Bush family had close ties to the Saudi Royal family.


    “A key factor in Bush’s Middle East policies was his friendship with Prince Bandar, the Saudi ambassador to the US. The two men were so close that Bandar was known to pop in unexpectedly at Bush’s summer retreat in Kennebunkport, Maine. They went on hunting trips together. Later, when Bush was out of the White House, he even tasked Bandar with teaching his eldest son – George W, then a presidential aspirant with no experience in international affairs – all about foreign policy.


    After his presidency was over, Bush and a number of his former cabinet officers also began participating in the Carlyle Group, a giant private equity firm heavily funded by Saudi billionaires – including the Saudi family of Osama bin Laden. As I reported in House of Bush, House of Saud, in the end, nearly $1.5bn made its way from the Saudis to individuals and institutions tied to the extended family of Bush cabinet officials and associates.


    Such ties were particularly noteworthy because of the House of Saud’s alliance with strident and puritanical Wahhabi fundamentalists, many of whom supported a violent jihad against the west. All of which raised disturbing questions after terrorists murdered nearly 3,000 people on 11 September 2001 in attacks orchestrated by Bin Laden.


    George HW Bush was long out of office and his son had become president. In the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks, when US air traffic was all but shut down, how is it that the White House approved the departure of more than 140 mostly Saudi passengers, many of whom were kin to Osama bin Laden? Why did Saudi Arabia – birthplace of 15 out of 19 hijackers – get preferential treatment from George W Bush’s White House at a time when Arab-Americans all over the country were being apprehended and interrogated? Had the Bushes’ close ties to the Saudis led them to look the other way – even after the worst terrorist attack in American history”? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...a-donald-trump


    (2016) “How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11: In its report on the still-censored “28 pages” implicating the Saudi government in 9/11, “60 Minutes” last weekend said the Saudi role in the attacks has been “soft-pedaled” to protect America’s delicate alliance with the oil-rich kingdom.


    That’s quite an understatement.


    Actually, the kingdom’s involvement was deliberately covered up at the highest levels of our government. And the coverup goes beyond locking up 28 pages of the Saudi report in a vault in the US Capitol basement. Investigations were throttled. Co-conspirators were let off the hook”. https://nypost.com/2016/04/17/how-us...i-role-in-911/


    (2022) “The Saudi government still says it had no connection to the hijackers, but newly released classified information indicates otherwise:


    Page 421: "a [deleted], dated July 2, 2002 [indicates] 'incontrovertible evidence that there is support for these terrorists inside the Saudi Government.” https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/...abias-role-911


    Saudi Government directly tied to 9/11 attacks: Declassified documents. https://www.businessinsider.com/saud...ar-2022-5?op=1


    The timing of the leaked classified 9/11 document is questionable, and proves that there is no length our government will not go to, to get what they want. We may have known Saudi Arabia was responsible for an attack on our soil, that we sent our men and women to fight and die for. We have killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in our pursuit for justice. All along we kept close ties with Saudi Arabia, trading with them, and assisting them in the Yemen genocide. It is only when they didn’t act as we like, that we struck a blow by releasing the classified documents implicating them in the 9/11 attacks. This is how governments play politics, with the lives of the people.


    (April 2022) “US Relations with Saudi Arabia and UAE are Deteriorating: in the wake of the Russo-Ukraine crisis, relationships with the US have been questioned by the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Both the Emirati and Saudis are not responding to Joe Biden’s efforts to reduce oil prices, and are refusing to take his calls, driving relations to an all-time low. Furthermore, agitations are arising with the stream of Russian wealth into the Emirates, while the US is trying to sanction the Russian economy


    “The Saudi-US relationship is in the throes of a crisis”. https://www.analystnews.com/politics...deteriorating/


    “Biden’s CIA chief met with Saudi Crown Prince in April: The Wall Street Journal reported the details of what the men discussed were unknown, but tension has been building over oil production, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Iran nuclear deal and the war in Yemen”. https://news.yahoo.com/biden-cia-chi...174539614.html


    “America’s Gulf ‘allies’ are now Putin’s enablers: The U.S.-led effort to thwart Russian President Vladimir Putin is being actively undermined by America’s supposed Persian Gulf allies, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The dictators who run these petrostates are raking in profits from oil sales while sky-high prices are filling Putin’s coffers and hurting the U.S. and European economies. With friends like these, who needs enemies”? https://qoshe.com/washington-post/jo...lers/137443823


    It appears the release of the document was either an act of blackmail, coercion, or retaliation. In the end it makes the United States look worse than Saudi Arabia. It is a move that may backfire.


    On October of 2002 the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution was signed into law granting the president war powers in Iraq, take note that it is dated less than three months after the classified document implicating the Saudi government in the 9-11 attacks. If in fact the government knew who was responsible, and led the public to believe Iraq played a role in order to gain favor for the invasion this would be deception of the highest order.


    “The resolution authorized President Bush to use the Armed Forces of the United States "as he determines to be necessary and appropriate" to "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq


    The Bush administration led the public to believe Iraq had weapons of mass destruction as well as ties to Al-Qaeda, and was supporting terrorist organizations.


    “The BBC has also noted that, while President Bush "never directly accused the former Iraqi leader of having a hand in the attacks on New York and Washington", he "repeatedly associated the two in keynote addresses delivered since 11 September", adding that "Senior members of his administration have similarly conflated the two." For instance, the BBC report quotes Colin Powell in February 2003, stating that "We've learned that Iraq has trained al-Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases. And we know that after September 11, Saddam Hussein's regime gleefully celebrated the terrorist attacks on America." The same BBC report also noted the results of a recent opinion poll, which suggested that "70% of Americans believe the Iraqi leader was personally involved in the attacks."[96]


    Also in September 2003, The Boston Globe reported that "Vice President Dick Cheney, anxious to defend the White House foreign policy amid ongoing violence in Iraq, stunned intelligence analysts and even members of his own administration this week by failing to dismiss a widely discredited claim: that Saddam Hussein might have played a role in the 11 Sept. attacks."[97] A year later, presidential candidate John Kerry alleged that Cheney was continuing "to intentionally mislead the American public by drawing a link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 in an attempt to make the invasion of Iraq part of the global war on terror."[98]


    Throughout 2002, the Bush administration insisted that removing Saddam from power to restore international peace and security was a major goal. The principal stated justifications for this policy of "regime change" were that Iraq's continuing production of weapons of mass destruction and known ties to terrorist organizations, as well as Iraq's continued violations of UN Security Council resolutions, amounted to a threat to the U.S. and the world community”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq


    The United States was led into a deadly, costly war under false pretenses. The people were deliberately misled, and all along the United States was teamed up with the very people who had orchestrated the attack, and used lies to garner support to take the nation to war.


    Hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians have been killed in these wars. It is thought that the conditions of war, such as famine, have killed far more people than the wars themselves. This would mean that perhaps millions have died.


    “The U.S. post-9/11 wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, and Pakistan have taken a tremendous human toll on those countries. As of September 2021, an estimated 387,072 civilians in these countries have died violent deaths as a result of the wars”.


    “War can also lead to death weeks or months after battles. Many times more people in the warzones have died as a result of battered infrastructure and poor health conditions arising from the wars than directly from its violence. For example, war refugees often lose access to a stable food supply or to their jobs, resulting in increased malnutrition and vulnerability to disease”. https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/...uman/civilians


    If you remember as earlier mentioned in the population control transcripts these people consider reducing populations in third world nations to be a priority. Wars, famines, and food shortages all bring about the conditions for mass death and suffering in third world nations. All of the conditions that they bragged about creating, and needing to create more of.


    7 Days after the attacks on 9/11 the AUMF Authorization for Use of Military Force was signed into law. The AUMF transferred the constitutional authority held by congress in acts of war into the hands of the President giving him unprecedented war powers. The extent of the powers was to be only that which pertained to the attacks on 9/11.


    “The authorization granted the President the authority to use all "necessary and appropriate force" against those whom he determined "planned, authorized, committed or aided" the September 11 attacks, or who harbored said persons or groups”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Author..._Force_of_2001


    The AUMF was left in place, and never repealed. To this day the President uses that very document to conduct decisions in war, whether they had any connection to 9/11 or not. Congress complains that the presidents are over stepping their bounds, and that as mentioned in the constitution, “only congress shall declare war”, article one section 8. https://constitution.congress.gov/br...e-1/section-8/


    In all honesty Congress doesn’t need to repeal the AUMF to re-claim their authority under the constitution, they still have their war powers. This is how the public is misled. The AUMF does not give the President powers of war, for any other circumstance that does not have relation to 9/11. Congress still has their war powers, rather it is that they are pretending that they don’t, and giving the authority to the President. In other words they have surrendered their authority, and are not upholding the constitution, in turn dishonoring the oath they swore to uphold.


    This surrender of power, and betrayal of the people has led to the forever wars in the middle east that have potentially killed millions. The AUMF was never meant to give the president permanent blanket war powers, it’s not the AUMF that did this, but congress themselves. They are actively participating in this violation, and pretending that they are not. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/...-107publ40.htm


    The attacks on 9/11 made possible much more than war, those attacks ushered in an age of surveillance, control through fear, and the violation of our fundamental rights and liberties. Because of fear, the masses surrendered their rights willingly. And those that have taken an oath to represent you and protect your rights, have chosen not to.


    After 9/11 we were kept in a constant state of fear, with a color coded threat level alert system.


    “In the United States, the Homeland Security Advisory System (HSAS) was a color-coded terrorism threat advisory scale created in March 2002 under the Bush Administration in response to the September 11 attacks. The different levels triggered specific actions by federal agencies and state and local governments, and they affected the level of security at some airports and other public facilities. It was often called the "terror alert level" by the U.S. media”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homela...dvisory_System


    (2017) “Americans' sustained fear from 9/11 has turned into something more dangerous: In 1995, two men bombed a building in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people. It was the largest terrorist attack on American soil at the time.


    A few days later, pollsters asked a simple question: How worried are you that you or someone in your family will become a victim of terrorism?


    More than 40 percent said they were very worried or somewhat worried.


    But over the next few years, without another mass bombing, that number steadily dropped.


    Then 9/11 happened. The number spiked to 58 percent.


    Much like with the Oklahoma City bombing, people calmed down in the following days, and the numbers began to drop. After a month, it was at 40 percent. It looked like fear would continue to dissipate until it got to pre-9/11 levels.


    That's not what happened, though.
    Instead, our fear levels stayed elevated


    People's fear never got as low as it was before 9/11. In other words, we're just as afraid of being a victim of terrorism as we were one month after 9/11”. https://www.vox.com/2016/9/9/1285222...hes-terrorists


    “Since 9/11, it seems that the American Left and the American Right have agreed on something of profound importance: We're scared.


    The politics of the last 12 years have been the politics of fear.


    Because of fear that one of us is a terrorist, we've allowed our intelligence services to listen into our private conversations; because of fear of terrorists from abroad, we have killed innocent people in foreign nations (supposedly to protect ourselves here)”.


    “None of it feels very brave or free. None of it feels very American”. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/twelv...1-le_b_3908194


    The growth of surveillance


    As the War on Terror began, so too did the increase of the U.S. government’s surveillance of its own citizens.


    Some programs were launched by the Bush Administration in secret, such as the President’s Surveillance Program (PSP), a set of secret intelligence activities authorized by Bush in 2001. PSP included the warrantless wiretapping of communications of people thought to be connected with al-Qaeda, and the warrantless collecting and mining of Americans’ phone and internet metadata. Codenamed “STELLARWIND,” the program slowly came to light over the following decade, first in a New York Times report in 2005 and more extensively in 2013 when the Washington Post and the Guardian published an internal report leaked by Edward Snowden that detailed the operations.


    “For me, the biggest [legacy of 9/11] is the radical increase in government secrecy, and attempts to keep as much government surveillance as possible hidden from the American people,” says Patrick G. Eddington, a senior fellow in homeland security and civil liberties at the libertarian Cato Institute.


    Congress also took several steps that furthered surveillance, including passing the Patriot Act in 2001, which drastically expanded surveillance tools used by law enforcement to investigate crimes. Among many controversial provisions, the Act included Section 215, which allowed for the collection of business records or any other “tangible thing” considered “relevant” to an international terrorism, counterespionage, or foreign intelligence investigation. It also included what was known as the “sneak and peek” provision, which allowed law enforcement to search citizens’ homes and offices without notifying them at the time of the search.


    “As a result, the government has much more power than it needs, actually, to go after people that have done nothing wrong,” says Russ Feingold”.


    “Feingold points out that in the 10 years after the Patriot Act, only 1% of cases using the “sneak and peek provision” were terrorism-related”.


    “Predominantly Black and brown communities—and in particular Muslim communities—are most directly impacted by this surveillance. “For many communities of color, especially the Muslim community, the government has deployed extraordinary surveillance and racial profiling,” says Shirin Sinnar, a professor of law at Stanford Law School. “And a lot of this has become routine, and extremely difficult to challenge in court.”


    In 2015, Congress passed the USA Freedom Act, which limited certain elements of Section 215 of the Patriot Act, but largely kept it in place. Section 215 expired in 2020, but other aspects of the Patriot Act—such as the “sneak and peek” provision—remain in place to this day”. https://time.com/6096903/september-11-legal-history/




    ACLU: “Hastily passed 45 days after 9/11 in the name of national security, the Patriot Act was the first of many changes to surveillance laws that made it easier for the government to spy on ordinary Americans by expanding the authority to monitor phone and email communications, collect bank and credit reporting records, and track the activity of innocent Americans on the Internet. While most Americans think it was created to catch terrorists, the Patriot Act actually turns regular citizens into suspects”. https://www.aclu.org/issues/national...er-patriot-act


    All of these infringements on our liberties were made possible by the secret FISA courts. We were led to believe that what they were doing to us was all legal, but in reality the FISA courts operate outside of the constitution. They are not bound by the laws, and no one is allowed to know what they are doing, or have done, even if what they are doing affects all of our lives. These courts according to the constitution are illegal.


    “This article concludes that FISA and its secret, ex parte courts are unconstitutional for three reasons. First, the secret, ex parte FISA courts violate the “case or controversy” requirement of Article III. Second, FISA violates Fourth Amendment liberties from unreasonable searches and seizures. Third, FISA and its secret, ex parte courts violate the due process guarantees of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.


    This article lastly considers the FISA statute and its secret, ex parte court system from a policy perspective. FISA apologists argue that the secret FISA courts are necessary for national security. They further argue that national security interests should override Constitutional protections.
    This article concludes, as the U.S. Supreme Court concluded in United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297, 320 (1972), that national security does not require secret courts. Furthermore, as the Supreme Court explained in U.S. District Court, national security interests do not override Constitutional protections”. https://hbu.edu/news-and-events/2018...-constitution/


    To add insult to injury, “The FISA court adjourns in a "bunker-like" complex operated by the U.S. District Court on Constitution Avenue”. https://www.thoughtco.com/fisa-court-4137599


    Yes, you heard that right “Constitution Avenue”. The founders wouldn’t just be rolling in their graves, they would come out with muskets and pitch forks.


    In truth, our representatives could stop all of this from happening today, simply because what they are doing with war, surveillance, and the courts are a direct violation of the constitution. They don’t need years to fix this, they could do it right now, but they aren’t. No matter what party line they follow, they are pretending to uphold the constitution so the people don’t realize they stopped following it long ago. They are no longer governing under the oath they took, to uphold the constitution. The people have been deceived. They ramble on about our sacred democracy, while they trample it under foot.


    The very representatives that we employed to serve the people are instead participating in perpetuating a control and management agenda on the people of the nation. 9/11 didn’t just open the door for all of this, it kicked that door right off the hinges. Our gov learned just how powerful fear could be, and they learned how to amplify those fears and perpetuate them. If the people are afraid, there is nothing they wont let you do. All you have to tell them is that it will stop the threat. You would think after years of being deceived the people would realize that they were being fooled, but each new thing, or emergency, is so powerful, and affects the lives of the people so profoundly that they just can’t see it for what it is.


    No matter what President we have had since 9/11 not one of them took measures to stop this tyranny. No matter what party they are from, red or blue, they have only worked to enhance the tyranny and further remove the rights of the people. It’s not the agenda that seems to be the problem, but rather who will lead it. All of these Presidents seem to have followed what seems to be the rule book for population control targeting third world nations, and furthering surveillance and little by little getting people used to the idea of letting go of their liberties.


    These atrocities did not end with Bush


    President Obama


    What Bush began, Obama continued and amplified. The Patriot Act was remastered into the Freedom Act, and in many ways was worse than the original Patriot Act. Fusion centers sprang up all around the nation gathering and sifting through our data. As mentioned in an earlier section on Population control and war, Obama was responsible for the massacre of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. He participated in the slaughter of the people of Yemen, he didn’t end it until just before his term was over. The people of Syria were targeted with genocide, and we were the ones who created the conditions, leaving them to die.


    The strange part is that under both Obama and Trump, the media remained nearly silent on Yemen. When you read the population control transcripts and outlines for reducing populations in third world nations it starts to add up. There is a stark contrast, when we see the continuous outrage on the Ukraine crisis, but while children are being massacred in Yemen there is hardly a blip. It’s was as though it weren’t happening, or that those lives don’t matter enough to report on.


    “The Obama Administration Should Be Found Guilty of War Crimes in Yemen:


    Those of us who supported Barack Obama in 2008 in the hope that he was a man of peace must face the painful reality -- we were dead wrong. Nowhere is our folly better illustrated than in the ongoing human rights catastrophe now unfolding in Yemen with critical U.S. assistance.


    the Obama Administration is knowingly aiding and abetting the Saudis in murdering millions in Yemen. This is a fact. And, it is a fact which is quite ironic given that the current Obama-appointed U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. is Samantha Power -- an individual who came to prominence through her Pulitzer-winning book which condemned the West's failure to respond to genocide throughout the world. In the case of Yemen, however, the genocide is not happening due to the mere omissions of the West, and in particular the U.S. -- rather, it is taking place with the active support of the U.S., including Power's own intervention at the U.N. which prevented any independent investigation of the Saudi crimes in Yemen.


    In other words, the Obama team, including Samantha Power herself, have become exactly what Power herself once condemned -- co-conspirators in genocide.


    the U.S. media bears great responsibility in all of this as well, for it is not true that the world has somehow "forgotten" about Yemen. Rather, the world has been shielded from the realities in Yemen by a media which has now become a mere mouthpiece for the U.S. State Department”. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/obama...uilt_b_8916380


    “'Peace' President? How Obama came to bomb seven countries in six years : US has engaged in conflict in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Libya and now Syria”. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...s-9753131.html


    “After more than five years of war and 450,000 deaths, the Syrian civil war will surely add an asterisk to President Obama’s legacy”. https://archive.thinkprogress.org/sy...y-350856fc2ac/


    “Barack Obama Is A War Criminal: Just two years into his presidency, it was clear that the “hope” that President Obama offered during his 2008 campaign could not escape U.S. imperialism”.
    https://harvardpolitics.com/obama-war-criminal/
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts