User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: Trump Invokes the 5th Almost 450 X - "YOU SEE THE MOB TAKES THE 5TH"

  1. #11
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,661, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497515
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,840
    Points
    863,661
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,688
    Thanked 148,525x in 94,959 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    yeah, when he said that a few years ago, I thought to myself: "He's wrong. I'd take the 5th every time."
    Yes, and Trump explained after this, that he now knows better about the 5th. The OP is just a complete [censored.]
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (08-14-2022)

  3. #12
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,661, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497515
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,840
    Points
    863,661
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,688
    Thanked 148,525x in 94,959 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    In Ohio you would be wrong. I would think that would be a grave constitutional violation. The constitution applies to both criminal and civil law.
    When Liquids brings up the Constitution it is safe to assume his is wrong 100% of the time.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (08-14-2022),Cletus (08-12-2022)

  5. #13
    Points: 76,685, Level: 67
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 1,065
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first Group50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Calendar Award
    TheLiquidGuy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2049
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    20,171
    Points
    76,685
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    2,595
    Thanked 2,039x in 1,743 Posts
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    In Ohio you would be wrong. I would think that would be a grave constitutional violation. The constitution applies to both criminal and civil law.
    I am not sure why this guy (an SDNY prosecutor) is speaking as though it can be used against him...

    “The negative inference that can be drawn at a civil trial down the road isn’t great for him — that’s the consequence of refusing to testify today, that the jury will be instructed that they can infer that his testimony would have harmed his case — but it’s small potatoes compared to the substantial risk that he would (1) disclose damaging information that could be used against him civilly and/or criminally, (2) lie to avoid disclosing harmful information and thereby open himself up to perjury charges, or both,” she told Law&Crime.

    Can Pleading the Fifth Hurt Trump in Civil Case


    I looked and saw no mention in the fifth about negative inferences. I suppose I could also make the argument that "Griffin v. California" is just a weak, invented add on (like RvW).


    “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
    rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
    --Donald Trump

    Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.



  6. #14
    Points: 76,685, Level: 67
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 1,065
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first Group50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Calendar Award
    TheLiquidGuy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2049
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    20,171
    Points
    76,685
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    2,595
    Thanked 2,039x in 1,743 Posts
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    When Liquids brings up the Constitution it is safe to assume his is wrong 100% of the time.
    Any non ad homs today, sport?


    No?


    Didn't think so.


    “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
    rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
    --Donald Trump

    Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.



  7. #15
    Points: 4,607, Level: 16
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 543
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Whale Song's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    543
    Join Date
    Jul 2022
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    515
    Points
    4,607
    Level
    16
    Thanks Given
    28
    Thanked 533x in 285 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Personally I don't assume someone is automatically guilty just because they plead the fifth. It's a constitutional right. What I do care about is that whole pesky guilty/not guilty thing people are so quick to overlook.
    "I became insane, with long intervals of horrible sanity."
    - EAP

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Whale Song For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (08-14-2022)

  9. #16
    Points: 34,530, Level: 45
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 920
    Overall activity: 59.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranSocial25000 Experience Points
    stephenpe's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2872
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    5,913
    Points
    34,530
    Level
    45
    Thanks Given
    5,563
    Thanked 2,866x in 1,911 Posts
    Mentioned
    105 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    yeah, when he said that a few years ago, I thought to myself: "He's wrong. I'd take the 5th every time."
    A 5th is not a bad thing at times...........he probably needed one after those 5ths download (4).jpeg

  10. #17
    Points: 96,425, Level: 75
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 925
    Overall activity: 56.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    The Booman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    31168
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Over the hills and far away...
    Posts
    34,059
    Points
    96,425
    Level
    75
    Thanks Given
    13,358
    Thanked 31,164x in 18,149 Posts
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Trump is the entire mob? I did not know that.





  11. The Following User Says Thank You to The Booman For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (08-14-2022)

  12. #18
    Points: 3,984, Level: 14
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 66
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran
    TheLion's Avatar Member
    Karma
    39
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    170
    Points
    3,984
    Level
    14
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 29x in 26 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    When Liquids brings up the Constitution it is safe to assume his is wrong 100% of the time.
    Yeah, he’s wrong here. The USSC has ruled that in CIVIL cases, invoking the Fifth can be used to infer guilt, but cannot be the only factor in establish guilt.

    “While in a criminal procedure, the court must instruct the jury that it cannot draw an inference of guilt from a defendant’s failure to testify about facts relevant to his case, (Griffin v. California (1965) 80 U.S. 609). In civil cases, “the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them.” (Baxter v. Palmigiano (1976) 425 U.S. 308, 318.)“

    https://www.advocatemagazine.com/article/2016-october/pleading-the-fifth-in-civil-cases

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to TheLion For This Useful Post:

    TheLiquidGuy (08-13-2022)

  14. #19
    Points: 3,984, Level: 14
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 66
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran
    TheLion's Avatar Member
    Karma
    39
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    170
    Points
    3,984
    Level
    14
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 29x in 26 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by The Booman View Post
    Trump is the entire mob? I did not know that.
    He’s just a crime family Don wannabe.

    Like everything else in his life, he sucks at it.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to TheLion For This Useful Post:

    Now_What (08-13-2022)

  16. #20
    Points: 76,685, Level: 67
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 1,065
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first Group50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Calendar Award
    TheLiquidGuy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2049
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    20,171
    Points
    76,685
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    2,595
    Thanked 2,039x in 1,743 Posts
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLion View Post
    Yeah, he’s wrong here. The USSC has ruled that in CIVIL cases, invoking the Fifth can be used to infer guilt, but cannot be the only factor in establish guilt.

    “While in a criminal procedure, the court must instruct the jury that it cannot draw an inference of guilt from a defendant’s failure to testify about facts relevant to his case, (Griffin v. California (1965) 80 U.S. 609). In civil cases, “the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them.” (Baxter v. Palmigiano (1976) 425 U.S. 308, 318.)“

    https://www.advocatemagazine.com/art...in-civil-cases
    Actually, it looks like I was right and the two lawyers were wrong.


    Hey guys, if you have any questions on Constitutional law, just shoot me a PM so it'll be less embarrassing for ya'


    “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
    rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
    --Donald Trump

    Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.



+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts