User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: How Microgrids Can Keep America’s Lights On

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,120, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497393
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,728
    Points
    863,120
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,641
    Thanked 148,403x in 94,884 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    How Microgrids Can Keep America’s Lights On

    The current grids are old and approaching or at obsolete. We should consider micro grids. It would make the critical infrastructure much more resilient overall.

    How Microgrids Can Keep America’s Lights On

    The world is currently suffering an energy crisis driven by high temperatures, the war in Ukraine, and a removal of baseload power generation. States like California have faced rolling blackouts and calls from the state for citizens to not charge their electric vehicles. To address this issue, states should adopt the use of microgrids to increase power generation and provide in times of emergency.


    Most states have a monopoly power company that serves a geographic area such as Entergy in parts of Louisiana or PG&E in California. Outside of a lack of competition for consumers, much of the current grid infrastructure has been pushed to a breaking point by recent spikes in energy demands. Microgrids operate outside this structure, providing energy —usually in the form of renewables or clean energy sources —to the small subset of the population or industrial zones that is not connected to the larger power company. Microgrids provide choice to consumers and increase power generation for the state and country as a whole which can be tapped into by the local grid in times of need.



    Building more microgrids can address America’s current and future power crisis in two ways. First, customers of the microgrid won’t rely on the main power grid to power their homes or charge their vehicles. Large industries that can reduce their costs which will attract jobs and economic value to the local area. This can mean more consistent power during seasons of high demand, and possibly lower prices. It will also be used as a way to improve resiliency from cyberattacks or natural disasters.
    Most importantly microgrids increase the total amount of energy generated, making them a key resource in times of high energy demand. Rather than asking people to only cool their house to 78 degrees or to avoid charging their vehicles, microgrids can supply more power to the main grid, increasing availability while demand is high.


    As the Department of Energy wrote about microgrids, “A microgrid not only provides backup for the grid in case of emergencies, but can also be used to cut costs, or connect to a local resource that is too small or unreliable for traditional grid use.”


    With all these benefits, why are there only roughly 450 microgrids across the United States?


    Foremost, the economic feasibility of establishing a solid microgrid industry proves difficult due to the nature of microgrid energy production. Because the grids continue to generate power even in times of low demand (for example, in the middle of the night) grids might generate more power than customers need, leaving potential grid companies with excess power they cannot sell. This makes the economics of running a microgrid difficult.


    Additionally, government regulations surrounding connecting a microgrid to the main power grid are often unclear, and the process would be costly. However, the combination of Bitcoin mining and sensible government reforms can address these issues.


    Typically, microgrids have needed to sell back their excess power back to the main power grid in times of high demand to remain profitable. But Bitcoin mining has a constant need of energy and is capable of purchasing any excess generation. Bitcoin miners are an extremely reliable customer for the energy generated from the microgrid which means microgrids are no longer reliant on selling their excess power back to the grid. Bitcoin mining as a customer on a microgrid also means the microgrid doesn’t need a grid interconnect before they can begin operating.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Just AnotherPerson (09-20-2022)

  3. #2
    Points: 265,397, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307984
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,752
    Points
    265,397
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,851
    Thanked 39,358x in 27,930 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Microgrids based on wind and solar fail for the same reason large grids do.

    I think microgrids based on small nuclear power plants make good sense. Let's build a thousand of them.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,120, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497393
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,728
    Points
    863,120
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,641
    Thanked 148,403x in 94,884 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Microgrids based on wind and solar fail for the same reason large grids do.
    I agree about the nuke microgrid. The Army is working on two types that should have civilian application.
    I think microgrids based on small nuclear power plants make good sense. Let's build a thousand of them.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  5. #4
    Points: 144,924, Level: 91
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 1,726
    Overall activity: 76.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    carolina73's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    44078
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    57,971
    Points
    144,924
    Level
    91
    Thanks Given
    56,454
    Thanked 44,083x in 28,493 Posts
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    First of all, I am all in mini nuke stations.

    And we hear the stories of internet companies losing customers who start up their own neighborhood networks at low cost and higher performance. Smaller can be both better and cheaper.

    How would the grids be operated would become a huge factor. What kind of power exchange would they have and who makes the decisions.

    How do you handle the Hoover Dam, Grand Coulee Dam, and the Tennessee Valley Authority? Huge amounts of power. Do they become huge grids or do they become small grids that can sell their power to other grids? Would they become state tun and distribute power to multiple grids? Does one small grid have to pay for the costs of being legally hassled for 20 years by an environmental group?

    Instead of 5 groups facing the problems we will have 1000.

    BTW. As a note. The environmentalists do not consider rain to be renewable so these hydroeletric stations are not considered green.
    Let's go Brandon !!!

  6. #5
    Points: 265,397, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307984
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,752
    Points
    265,397
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,851
    Thanked 39,358x in 27,930 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carolina73 View Post
    First of all, I am all in mini nuke stations.

    And we hear the stories of internet companies losing customers who start up their own neighborhood networks at low cost and higher performance.

    How would the grids be operated would become a huge factor. What kind of power exchange would they have and who makes the decisions.

    How do you handle the Hoover Dam, Grand Coulee Dam, and the Tennessee Valley Authority? Huge amounts of power. Do they become huge grids or do they become small grids that can sell their power to other grids? Would they become state tun and distribute power to multiple grids? Does one small grid have to pay for the costs of being legally hassled for 20 years by an environmental group?

    Instead of 5 groups facing the problems we will have 1000.

    BTW. As a note. The environmentalists do not consider rain to be renewable so these hydroeletric stations are not considered green.
    Laws and regulations will need to eliminated/changed. It is a small price to pay for modernity and wealth.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts