The Current Events Room
This article focuses on the technological disadvantages.Russian spies couldn’t steal US tech as fast as the US industrial base could continually improve on it (Moore’s Law).The other problem with the Russian military is due to the nature of an authoritarian state.Officers can’t be too competent as that poses a coup risk.Enlisted are trained to only follow orders and to not take initiative.I think that even had the Russians kept up technologically, their performance would still be lacking because of the culture that keeps the military more of an unimaginative tool of the State.
Why Is Putin’s Army Inept? - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
Whatever happened to the Russian Army? For that matter, whatever happened to the Russian Air Force or the Russian Navy, whose flagship is now at the bottom of the Black Sea? The answer is nothing. Nothing has happened to the Russian military for 50 years, and President Vladimir Putin should have thought twice before heaving his armed forces into a war.
Their disastrous performance puts me in mind of an appearance I made on CNN’s Capital Gang on December 2, 1989. That was 33 years ago. The show the New York Times that “many things that were characteristic of the Cold War should be abandoned.” Incidentally, I was never invited back to Capital Gang.
I do not know who the Gangsters on Capital Gang used for sources, but I always checked my sources thoroughly before appearing on television. This time all my sources agreed. The Cold War was finished. The problem was that the Red Army’s generals were convinced that continuing the Cold War would bankrupt the Soviet Union, just as President Ronald Reagan had predicted when he launched the arms race a decade earlier. The problem was that the communists could not build machine parts to compete with the free market’s output. The Cold War was over.
The news from Ukraine suggests that Russia never caught up with the West. It tried to catch up, but it failed. So, it relied on stealing weaponry from the West, mainly from the United States. Apparently, that was not good enough. Russian spies were not as productive as Western technology. Time and again throughout the Cold War, the West would move ahead in technology and the Russians would steal the West’s secrets in order to catch up. It worked occasionally, but in one area their stealing was utterly futile: the microchip. When Moore’s Law came into play in the 1980s, the West’s advantage became increasingly apparent, apparent and invincible. Moore’s Law predicted that the processing power of chips would grow exponentially, leaving the Soviets’ capacity to replicate Western chips and other advances far behind. Today Western advances are dwarfing Russian developments. (READ MORE from R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.: The Noose Tightens on Putin)
***
For 50 years, with the help of Moore’s Law and the technological know-how to use it, the Western powers have been developing superior weapons while the Russians have been copying filched weapons that, by the time they are brought back to Russia, are likely already dated. The Russian military understood in 1989 that it could not keep up with the West in such endeavors as machining parts, and apparently it understands today that the situation still has not changed. The simple fact is that the free-market system, working in a free society, is more innovative and productive than the statism of Russia. My spies again tell me that it is the military that understands once again Moscow’s predicament.
Back in the 1980s, a Russian general understood that communications technologies and the computer chip and sensor were revolutionizing war. Gen. Nikolai Ogarkov, chief of the Soviet General Staff, predicted that “long-range, highly accurate, terminally guided combat systems, unmanned flying machines and qualitatively new electronic control systems” were on the horizon. Yes, Ogarkov, but how could Moscow adapt your vision to Putin’s economic model?
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Chuck
