How come election law errors census errors, and other rules always benefit Democrats?

[LescoBrandon]

A simple question, really.

The census that was taken in 2020 has already been found to be faulty - awarding more population and therefore more House seats, to Democrats. In fact, the whole apportionment system and allocation of Congressional House seats is way out of whack.

For instance, there are two districts in California which, due to the large population of illegals, obtain the requisite 750,000 population that results in a new House seat. However, because illegals are such a large percentage of the population in those districts, it only takes 33,000 votes to win a seat. On average, in other states where the federal immigration laws are followed, it takes, on average, 110,000 votes to win a House seat. So, because liberals don't obey the federal immigration policy, and census rules have not been updated, my vote in Texas is worth - literally - about 1/3rd the vote of a Democrat vote in California district 34.

Furthermore, reports on the recent census taken found errors - which again - consistently overstate populations in blue states and underreport populations in red states. therefore benefiting Democrats, yet again.

Makes me think that secession is the best solution to this fiasco. Lawlessness is the rule, and nothing is being done about it.

[Tahuyaman]

How come election law errors census errors, and other rules always benefit Democrats?

There is no valid or rational answer to that question.

[donttread]

A simple question, really.

The census that was taken in 2020 has already been found to be faulty - awarding more population and therefore more House seats, to Democrats. In fact, the whole apportionment system and allocation of Congressional House seats is way out of whack.

For instance, there are two districts in California which, due to the large population of illegals, obtain the requisite 750,000 population that results in a new House seat. However, because illegals are such a large percentage of the population in those districts, it only takes 33,000 votes to win a seat. On average, in other states where the federal immigration laws are followed, it takes, on average, 110,000 votes to win a House seat. So, because liberals don't obey the federal immigration policy, and census rules have not been updated, my vote in Texas is worth - literally - about 1/3rd the vote of a Democrat vote in California district 34.

Furthermore, reports on the recent census taken found errors - which again - consistently overstate populations in blue states and underreport populations in red states. therefore benefiting Democrats, yet again.

Makes me think that secession is the best solution to this fiasco. Lawlessness is the rule, and nothing is being done about it.

Yeah, they never bothered to explain that

[The Booman]

They are specifically designed errors.

[Peter1469]

A simple question, really.

The census that was taken in 2020 has already been found to be faulty - awarding more population and therefore more House seats, to Democrats. In fact, the whole apportionment system and allocation of Congressional House seats is way out of whack.

For instance, there are two districts in California which, due to the large population of illegals, obtain the requisite 750,000 population that results in a new House seat. However, because illegals are such a large percentage of the population in those districts, it only takes 33,000 votes to win a seat. On average, in other states where the federal immigration laws are followed, it takes, on average, 110,000 votes to win a House seat. So, because liberals don't obey the federal immigration policy, and census rules have not been updated, my vote in Texas is worth - literally - about 1/3rd the vote of a Democrat vote in California district 34.

Furthermore, reports on the recent census taken found errors - which again - consistently overstate populations in blue states and underreport populations in red states. therefore benefiting Democrats, yet again.

Makes me think that secession is the best solution to this fiasco. Lawlessness is the rule, and nothing is being done about it.

Perhaps they weren't errors.

[RichardMZhlubb]

For instance, there are two districts in California which, due to the large population of illegals, obtain the requisite 750,000 population that results in a new House seat. However, because illegals are such a large percentage of the population in those districts, it only takes 33,000 votes to win a seat. On average, in other states where the federal immigration laws are followed, it takes, on average, 110,000 votes to win a House seat. So, because liberals don't obey the federal immigration policy, and census rules have not been updated, my vote in Texas is worth - literally - about 1/3rd the vote of a Democrat vote in California district 34.

This is complete gibberish. Congressional districts are established AFTER the statewide census results are in.

[DGUtley]

743890EF-F0DF-4591-AB73-E2FC1B7FD26E.jpeg

[RichardMZhlubb]

Attachment 52885

Don’t believe everything you read online. (Stalin never said that.)

[carolina73]

Perhaps they weren't errors.

The census count is usually estimates of illegals. They are in the shadows. Yeah right.

[DGUtley]

Don’t believe everything you read online. (Stalin never said that.)

In Sum and substance he did. In 2006, Wikiquote dug up a source: The Memoirs of Stalin’s Former Secretaryby Boris Bazhanov, published in 2002. Translated from the Russian, the version which, according to Bazhanov, was uttered in 1923 by Stalin in reference to a vote in the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was this:

“I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.“


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/st...e-count-quote/