User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Unredacted Fauci e-mails: a bad look

  1. #11
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,122, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496581
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,700
    Points
    859,122
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,223
    Thanked 147,591x in 94,420 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FindersKeepers View Post
    I'm no scientist, but why does the term "gain of function" appear on page 133 of Fauci's emails?

    Attachment 53451
    I am not a scientist either, but it can't say gain of function: Fauci said absolutely none of that going one around here.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    FindersKeepers (11-24-2022),Just AnotherPerson (01-20-2023)

  3. #12
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,122, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496581
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,700
    Points
    859,122
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,223
    Thanked 147,591x in 94,420 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Carl Young View Post
    The MSM were also involved in this cover-up, still are, and there has been little reporting on the statistical 'excess deaths' either.

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/health...X0RlrACQ%3D%3D
    The MSM should be coconspirators at the trial.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Just AnotherPerson (01-20-2023)

  5. #13
    Points: 123,366, Level: 85
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 2,684
    Overall activity: 60.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    FindersKeepers's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    173984
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    35,702
    Points
    123,366
    Level
    85
    Thanks Given
    25,436
    Thanked 26,625x in 16,267 Posts
    Mentioned
    271 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I am not a scientist either, but it can't say gain of function: Fauci said absolutely none of that going one around here.
    Right. LOL

    I just scanned the holdings, but I was struck by the audacity and self-importance of Fauci and some of his colleagues in thinking the public shouldn't be privy to their discussions because they couldn't handle the truth (paraphrase).
    ""A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul" ~George Bernard Shaw

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to FindersKeepers For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (11-24-2022)

  7. #14
    Points: 22,307, Level: 36
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 843
    Overall activity: 23.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Carl Young's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    4743
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    9,811
    Points
    22,307
    Level
    36
    Thanks Given
    7,652
    Thanked 4,736x in 3,445 Posts
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    The MSM should be coconspirators at the trial.
    Agreed, and they should be called as witnesses at any investigation. Of course they'll have their Constitutional defense but I'm not sure that applies if they participated in crimes being committed.

  8. #15
    Points: 22,307, Level: 36
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 843
    Overall activity: 23.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Carl Young's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    4743
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    9,811
    Points
    22,307
    Level
    36
    Thanks Given
    7,652
    Thanked 4,736x in 3,445 Posts
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I am not a scientist either, but it can't say gain of function: Fauci said absolutely none of that going one around here.
    Rand Paul, who I view with ever growing respect, really had a weak and 'indignant' Fauci struggling.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Carl Young For This Useful Post:

    LescoBrandon (11-24-2022),Peter1469 (11-25-2022)

  10. #16
    Original Ranter
    Points: 859,122, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 90.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    496581
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    241,700
    Points
    859,122
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,223
    Thanked 147,591x in 94,420 Posts
    Mentioned
    2552 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    And more-

    Fauci Was Part Of Group Assembled To ‘Disprove’ Lab Leak Theory, Emails Show




    Dr. Anthony Fauci was part of a group of scientists who, according to at least one of them, were working to “disprove” the lab-leak theory in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, emails show.


    Fauci, who at the time was director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, worked alongside others, including National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins, Wellcome Trust director Jeremy Farrar, Scripps Research’s Kristian Andersen and Dutch Virologist Ron Fouchier to investigate early evidence on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, emails obtained by journalist Jimmy Tobias revealed. On Feb. 8, 2020, Andersen wrote in an email that the group’s work was “focused on trying to disprove any type of lab theory.”



    Andersen ultimately became the first author listed on the paper “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” the most influential paper published about the origins of COVID-19 during the early stages of the pandemic. The paper was cited by more than 2,000 media outlets and viewed nearly six million times online, according to The Intercept.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Just AnotherPerson (01-20-2023)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts