User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: D.C.'s 'Green New Deal for Housing' Is Doomed Before It Begins

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497542
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,552x in 94,974 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    D.C.'s 'Green New Deal for Housing' Is Doomed Before It Begins

    DC wants to reimage public housing to include climate and social justice. To put people, and the planet first. Current public housing in DC is a failure so it isn't likely those who manage failure will get it right with this reimaging.

    D.C.'s 'Green New Deal for Housing' Is Doomed Before It Begins

    Just a couple months after federal investigators found shambolic management and appalling conditions at thousands of public housing units in Washington, D.C, district politicians and activists want to expand the city's housing portfolio with an ambitious "Green New Deal for Housing."


    The hope is that with a new office, a more expansive mission, and different branding, the city can build and operate new "social housing" that accomplishes a wide range of social goals while avoiding the pitfalls of the public housing units it currently owns.


    "The Green New Deal for housing is about confronting our housing crisis, our climate crisis, our displacement crisis with a comprehensive approach that puts both our people and our planet first," Councilmember Janeese Lewis George, the bill's author, at a public hearing of the district council's Committee on Housing and Executive Administration last week.


    Lewis George's bill would create a new Office of Social Housing Development within the city government that would purchase existing housing units or build new ones. The city would then operate these properties as mixed-income social housing where two-thirds of the units would be rented out at affordable rates to very low- and extremely low-income district residents.


    Note: Shortened by mod.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. #2

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 479,753, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 86.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    201371
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    53,478
    Points
    479,753
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,195
    Thanked 46,641x in 25,174 Posts
    Mentioned
    893 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sure, they'll get it right this time....
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    carolina73 (12-05-2022)

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497542
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,552x in 94,974 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    Sure, they'll get it right this time....
    DC local government is a ceasepool.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    carolina73 (12-05-2022)

  6. #4
    Points: 81,843, Level: 69
    Level completed: 75%, Points required for next Level: 607
    Overall activity: 40.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    countryboy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    28592
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    29,014
    Points
    81,843
    Level
    69
    Thanks Given
    10,616
    Thanked 21,829x in 13,706 Posts
    Mentioned
    237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    Sure, they'll get it right this time....
    All they need is more money.
    Cutesy Time is OVER

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to countryboy For This Useful Post:

    carolina73 (12-05-2022),DGUtley (12-05-2022)

  8. #5
    Points: 145,096, Level: 91
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 1,554
    Overall activity: 69.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    carolina73's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    44143
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    58,047
    Points
    145,096
    Level
    91
    Thanks Given
    56,521
    Thanked 44,148x in 28,537 Posts
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have never seen a public project for the poor that ended well for anyone but the contractors that built them.
    Let's go Brandon !!!

  9. #6
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497542
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,552x in 94,974 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carolina73 View Post
    I have never seen a public project for the poor that ended well for anyone but the contractors that built them.
    The article mentions Vienna as a success. I didn't really pay attention to that part.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts