User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 111 to 116 of 116

Thread: Pick up trucks are the new enemy of the left.

  1. #111
    Points: 427,212, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    307280
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    181,537
    Points
    427,212
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,044
    Thanked 76,293x in 55,129 Posts
    Mentioned
    683 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    The idea that military spending is preventing us from restoring and improving our infrastructure is a wrong-headed position.
    When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.“ - Benjamin Franklin.


    “When people get used to preferential treatment equal treatment seems like discrimination.” - Thomas Sowell

  2. #112
    Points: 220,947, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteranYour first Group
    Ethereal's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    468692
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    67,265
    Points
    220,947
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    14,200
    Thanked 41,424x in 25,925 Posts
    Mentioned
    1163 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Actually, military spending is a small percentage of federal spending. Heck, the nondiscretionary budget (social security, Medicare, Medicaid) make up 86% of federal spending. The discretionary budget (military spending part of that) is 14%.
    According to a report from Brown University, the cost of the "war on terror" was about $8 trillion. That is $8 trillion down the toilet, money that could have been spent on any number of socially beneficial things, including lower taxes for the working and middle classes. Whether this constitutes a "small" percentage of the overall federal budget isn't really the point. The point is that this was a gigantic waste of resources that contributes mightily to America's degraded infrastructure and standard of living. Moreover, depending on how you account for spending, the true cost of US militarism is probably closer to $1 trillion annually, when you include the cost of veteran services, various "national security" agencies like the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, ATF, DHS, etc., foreign aid, and interest payments on debt. And even though entitlement spending makes up the bulk of federal spending, and even though I'm opposed to those programs in principle, they at least provide a material and direct benefit to Americans. US military spending, on the other hand, is almost entirely wasteful, done in service of corrupt profiteering interests who only want to use the military as their personal plaything. Eisenhower called them the "military-industrial complex". Without this pernicious influence over America's political landscape, our country's standard of living would be MUCH higher. And I continue to be absolutely baffled as to why more Americans are not angered by this.
    Power always thinks it has a great soul, and vast views, beyond the comprehension of the weak. And that it is doing God service when it is violating all His laws.
    --John Adams

  3. #113
    Points: 93,797, Level: 74
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 953
    Overall activity: 64.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    The Booman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    30208
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Over the hills and far away...
    Posts
    33,069
    Points
    93,797
    Level
    74
    Thanks Given
    12,996
    Thanked 30,204x in 17,607 Posts
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They can ban those poncy trucks with large cab for 19 people and a really tiny bed. They're ridiculous.
    Last edited by The Booman; 01-28-2023 at 03:49 PM.





  4. The Following User Says Thank You to The Booman For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (01-29-2023)

  5. #114
    Points: 32,151, Level: 43
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 299
    Overall activity: 0.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    The Sage of Main Street's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    15009
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    12,431
    Points
    32,151
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    9,384
    Thanked 2,249x in 1,927 Posts
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Now_What View Post
    Kind of like the conservative men who are afraid of black people, “brown” people, vaccines, big cities, Muslims, immigrants, gay people, trans people, and They menstruate too.
    A Netrix of Dust Bunnies Posing As Thoughts


    Typical shallow logic. There can be an identical reaction and an identical right to fear, but one side can deserve punishment from what it fears and the other can have the duty to put fear in its enemies and act on it.
    On the outside, trickling down on the Insiders

    We won't live free until the Democrats, and their voters, live in fear.

  6. #115
    Points: 32,151, Level: 43
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 299
    Overall activity: 0.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    The Sage of Main Street's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    15009
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    12,431
    Points
    32,151
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    9,384
    Thanked 2,249x in 1,927 Posts
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    According to a report from Brown University, the cost of the "war on terror" was about $8 trillion. That is $8 trillion down the toilet, money that could have been spent on any number of socially beneficial things, including lower taxes for the working and middle classes. Whether this constitutes a "small" percentage of the overall federal budget isn't really the point. The point is that this was a gigantic waste of resources that contributes mightily to America's degraded infrastructure and standard of living. Moreover, depending on how you account for spending, the true cost of US militarism is probably closer to $1 trillion annually, when you include the cost of veteran services, various "national security" agencies like the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, ATF, DHS, etc., foreign aid, and interest payments on debt. And even though entitlement spending makes up the bulk of federal spending, and even though I'm opposed to those programs in principle, they at least provide a material and direct benefit to Americans. US military spending, on the other hand, is almost entirely wasteful, done in service of corrupt profiteering interests who only want to use the military as their personal plaything. Eisenhower called them the "military-industrial complex". Without this pernicious influence over America's political landscape, our country's standard of living would be MUCH higher. And I continue to be absolutely baffled as to why more Americans are not angered by this.
    Economical Hawks


    The cheapest way would have bought us victory. Nuke Tora Bora instead of occupying Afghanistan as an outpost against Russia.

    Let Saddam get strong enough to make war on Iran again. Kuwait's oil would have helped him finish that job. There also would have been a negative defense spending in selling him arms to do it. And a retroactive cut in letting him have useless parasite Kuwait's oil to further finance his Iraq-Iran War.
    On the outside, trickling down on the Insiders

    We won't live free until the Democrats, and their voters, live in fear.

  7. #116
    Original Ranter
    Points: 850,958, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    494993
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    239,390
    Points
    850,958
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    152,084
    Thanked 145,999x in 93,426 Posts
    Mentioned
    2541 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    According to a report from Brown University, the cost of the "war on terror" was about $8 trillion. That is $8 trillion down the toilet, money that could have been spent on any number of socially beneficial things, including lower taxes for the working and middle classes. Whether this constitutes a "small" percentage of the overall federal budget isn't really the point. The point is that this was a gigantic waste of resources that contributes mightily to America's degraded infrastructure and standard of living. Moreover, depending on how you account for spending, the true cost of US militarism is probably closer to $1 trillion annually, when you include the cost of veteran services, various "national security" agencies like the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, ATF, DHS, etc., foreign aid, and interest payments on debt. And even though entitlement spending makes up the bulk of federal spending, and even though I'm opposed to those programs in principle, they at least provide a material and direct benefit to Americans. US military spending, on the other hand, is almost entirely wasteful, done in service of corrupt profiteering interests who only want to use the military as their personal plaything. Eisenhower called them the "military-industrial complex". Without this pernicious influence over America's political landscape, our country's standard of living would be MUCH higher. And I continue to be absolutely baffled as to why more Americans are not angered by this.
    And the costs of our entitlement programs yet to be funded is around $250T.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (01-29-2023)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts