carolina73 (03-20-2023),The Sage of Main Street (03-20-2023)
countryboy (03-20-2023),Ransom (03-22-2023),zelmo1234 (03-20-2023)
The Sage of Main Street (03-20-2023)
A review of her Stolen Youth: How Radicals Are Erasing Innocence and Indoctrinating a Generation can be found in Leave Them Kids Alone:
...Rounding out Stolen Youth, Markowicz and Mandel lead the reader to the next frontier in the parental rights battle: transgender medicine. As recent revelations about the gender clinic at the St. Louis Children's Hospital indicate, the authors were right on target. Last month, Jamie Reed, a former staffer at the St. Louis gender clinic, blew the whistle on the untested and unsound treatments the transgender clinic provides for children—including puberty-blocking drugs and hormones. As Reed reported, and Markowicz echoes in the chapter, the experts entrusted to the care of children admit that, when it comes to pediatric transgender medicine, they "are building the plane while [they] are flying it." This is no way to treat children.
Markowicz and Mandel throughout the book provide concrete ways in which parents can protect their children, from "opting out" of certain lessons to requesting public records and finding alternative education options. While they're all excellent suggestions, even sending a simple letter to a child's school may seem daunting—readers may be left wanting more information on how to do so.
Stolen Youth aptly depicts where the parents' fight likely began for most readers, and where it is headed. Reading between the lines, that means that the fight is far from over. Through my time working in the education space, parents who've come to me and my colleagues for help ask for three things: someone with whom they can share their stories, advice on how to combat these issues, and the motivation to keep fighting. Markowicz and Mandel successfully provide all three in Stolen Youth, though I hope they're preparing for part two.
When media lies about her defining Woke they are condoning grooming.
To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss. ― Michael Joseph Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays
Remember the Religious Right, the TEA party was considered to be the anti Christ to the point that people did not know that it stood for Taxed Enough Already. The left is a master of framing the part with negative words, it is just coming back upon you and you don't like it.
in 2024 your party will have to defend teaching kids about gender, social hate and sexual perversions instead of History R3eading and Arithmetic we will see how far gone the country is.
To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss. ― Michael Joseph Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays
We Obviously Know Everything
They've had this whining resentment about justice for decades, so WOKE is intentionally misleading, because it's not about waking up to anything. It's about extreme action in order to quickly and impatiently reach the Final Solution in crushing Straight White Male superiority. For example, on the heterophobe part of it, actually invading grade schools and seducing gullible children so they wind up losing the will to survive. The cartoon model is Pinocchio's friends being turned into donkeys.
On the outside, trickling down on the Insiders
We won't live free until the Democrats, and their voters, live in fear.
Peter1469 (03-21-2023)
Well that petered out, the Wokesters fell asleep at the wheel.
It's rewarding to argue beside those on the right, each with his own way to approach it but all pretty much agreeing.
To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss. ― Michael Joseph Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays