User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Actually, Dobbs Was the Opposite of a Power Grab

  1. #1
    Points: 616,060, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 71.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    424635
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    185,555
    Points
    616,060
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    27,719
    Thanked 72,210x in 49,620 Posts
    Mentioned
    1955 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Actually, Dobbs Was the Opposite of a Power Grab

    You might cite Marbury v Madison as a power grab but Actually, Dobbs Was the Opposite of a Power Grab. Dobbs was SCOTUS overturning SCOTUS.

    In the Atlantic, Kimberly Wehle argues that:

    By its own maneuvering, the modern Supreme Court has made itself the most powerful branch of government. Superior to Congress. Superior to the president. Superior to the states. Superior to precedent, procedure, and norms. In effect, superior to the people.

    Interesting. What does Wehle have in mind?

    Most talked about in this regard, of course, is the Court’s ending of long-established reproductive rights in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. But the assertion of extreme power extends well beyond the issue of abortion.

    Wait, what? Wehle’s primary example of the Supreme Court’s supposedly making “itself the most powerful branch of government” — “superior” in position to Congress, the president, the states, precedent, procedure, norms, and the people is . . . Dobbs? The case in which the Court overturned an act of astonishing judicial usurpation and sent power back to the people? The case that returned to the states an authority that the judiciary had falsely claimed for half a century. That was the “assertion of extreme power”?

    This is completely backwards. It is an inversion of the truth. It is as upside-down as it is possible to get....
    The Antlanta article can be found here: The Supreme Court Just Keeps Deciding It Should Be Even More Powerful.
    To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss. ― Michael Joseph Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (03-14-2023),RMNIXON (03-14-2023)

  3. #2
    Original Ranter
    Points: 789,342, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    483501
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    223,779
    Points
    789,342
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    144,650
    Thanked 134,485x in 86,237 Posts
    Mentioned
    2488 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Federalism is the opposite of a power grab.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    carolina73 (03-14-2023),MisterVeritis (03-14-2023)

  5. #3
    Points: 81,546, Level: 69
    Level completed: 63%, Points required for next Level: 904
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    RMNIXON's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    23461
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    22,725
    Points
    81,546
    Level
    69
    Thanks Given
    24,021
    Thanked 23,451x in 13,754 Posts
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If the Constitution is as open to interpretation as the liberal insists then why can't SCOTUS re-examine previous rulings and overturn them?

    This is about SCOTUS having Equal Powers as designed not becoming over powerful.
    Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is NOT my problem!

  6. #4
    Points: 9,137, Level: 22
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 113
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience Points
    LWW's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1039
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Location
    People's Midwest Republic of Ameristan
    Posts
    2,279
    Points
    9,137
    Level
    22
    Thanks Given
    763
    Thanked 1,029x in 694 Posts
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RMNIXON View Post
    If the Constitution is as open to interpretation as the liberal insists then why can't SCOTUS re-examine previous rulings and overturn them?

    This is about SCOTUS having Equal Powers as designed not becoming over powerful.
    That’s easy.

    Left wing democrats opposed the Dred Scott and Brown vs Board of Education decisions.
    "Buy a man eat fish, the day, teach a man to a life time! "
    "As one computer said, if
    you're on the train and they say 'PORTAL BRIDGE' you know you better make other plans."
    - Joseph Robinette Biden -

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts