User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 73

Thread: Religious Folks Struggle the Most...

  1. #21
    Points: 91,611, Level: 73
    Level completed: 75%, Points required for next Level: 639
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Common Sense's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    931107
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    41,620
    Points
    91,611
    Level
    73
    Thanks Given
    14,180
    Thanked 16,028x in 11,276 Posts
    Mentioned
    542 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    You could make that argument, but it would not be a valid one. Religious faith is not contingent upon having or not having a certain level of intelligence. Faith and intelligence are two totally different animals. You can be as dumb as a bucket of hammers and be a devout adherent to your religious beliefs or you you could be stump stupid and have zero faith. The opposite is also true. You will find people of faith with IQs off the scale sitting right next to an atheist who is his intellectual equal. To try to conflate faith or a lack of faith with intellect is absurd.
    I didn’t say it was a certainty. I said there could be an argument made.

    There are definitely dullards on both sides. And didn’t mean to paint with a broad brush.

    But….statistically speaking, the more educated someone is, the less likely they are to be religious. While there are many intelligent people who believe in the supernatural, IQ tests and other measures of intelligence and education, demonstrate a correlation between intelligence and skepticism.

  2. #22
    Points: 625,780, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    426481
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    188,169
    Points
    625,780
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    28,940
    Thanked 74,057x in 50,763 Posts
    Mentioned
    1965 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common Sense View Post
    Not at all. Even the most obtuse liberal doesn’t claim the government is an all powerful entity controlling everything. Nor do they think the government is a source of salvation, and not believing results in eternal damnation. Maybe in a cartoonish stereotypical exaggeration of liberalism that doesn’t exist outside of your imagination, there is a valid comparison. But in reality, comparing the belief in a supernatural omnipotent and omnipresent deity, is nothing like supporting good government.
    On the contrary, people, generally, do look to the government as the solution of all problems and to provide salvation here on earth.

    I wasn't comparing. I think government is the only thing that fits your qualifications.
    To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss. ― Michael Joseph Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    zelmo1234 (03-26-2023)

  4. #23
    Points: 625,780, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    426481
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    188,169
    Points
    625,780
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    28,940
    Thanked 74,057x in 50,763 Posts
    Mentioned
    1965 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common Sense View Post
    Well, an argument could be made that those who accept mythological stories and supernatural phenomenon, without actual evidence, could be considered less intelligent than those who require more proof than ‘just trust me’, or an old story from the Middle East, or feelings and faith.

    I would certainly question the intellectual capacity of someone who believes in unicorns, leprechauns or other mythological beings with no actual evidence of their existence beyond simple belief.

    I don't think that fits anyone but your caricature of others.

    Anyway, like what'shisname, you merely restate the initial claim but provide no evidence to back it up.
    To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss. ― Michael Joseph Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays

  5. #24
    Points: 625,780, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    426481
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    188,169
    Points
    625,780
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    28,940
    Thanked 74,057x in 50,763 Posts
    Mentioned
    1965 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    You could make that argument, but it would not be a valid one. Religious faith is not contingent upon having or not having a certain level of intelligence. Faith and intelligence are two totally different animals. You can be as dumb as a bucket of hammers and be a devout adherent to your religious beliefs or you you could be stump stupid and have zero faith. The opposite is also true. You will find people of faith with IQs off the scale sitting right next to an atheist who is his intellectual equal. To try to conflate faith or a lack of faith with intellect is absurd.

    True. But I think intelligence is harder to define and I'm not sure IQ is the only or even any measure.
    To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss. ― Michael Joseph Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays

  6. #25
    Points: 625,780, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    426481
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    188,169
    Points
    625,780
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    28,940
    Thanked 74,057x in 50,763 Posts
    Mentioned
    1965 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common Sense View Post
    I didn’t say it was a certainty. I said there could be an argument made.

    There are definitely dullards on both sides. And didn’t mean to paint with a broad brush.

    But….statistically speaking, the more educated someone is, the less likely they are to be religious. While there are many intelligent people who believe in the supernatural, IQ tests and other measures of intelligence and education, demonstrate a correlation between intelligence and skepticism.
    statistically speaking, the more educated someone is, the less likely they are to be religious. While there are many intelligent people who believe in the supernatural, IQ tests and other measures of intelligence and education, demonstrate a correlation between intelligence and skepticism.
    One, that's not exactly what some science claims. Two, even what science actually says is questionable.
    To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss. ― Michael Joseph Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays

  7. #26

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 67,378, Level: 63
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 1,372
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    193490
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    29,454
    Points
    67,378
    Level
    63
    Thanks Given
    2,748
    Thanked 25,175x in 14,531 Posts
    Mentioned
    356 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    True. But I think intelligence is harder to define and I'm not sure IQ is the only or even any measure.
    I used IQ just because it is a form of measurement with which most people are familiar. I agree with your point. I would also add having a college degree does not make you educated.
    “Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.” - Barry Goldwater

  8. #27
    Original Ranter
    Points: 802,880, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 79.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    486058
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    227,343
    Points
    802,880
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    146,547
    Thanked 137,042x in 87,891 Posts
    Mentioned
    2493 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jes'fuchinwitcha View Post
    One reason is probably that non-religious folks are generally more intelligent and aware of reality.
    Perhaps a lot of high IQ types are theists, but a lot of strap-hangers on the left side of the bell curve are too.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  9. #28
    Points: 6,152, Level: 18
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 198
    Overall activity: 76.0%
    Achievements:
    31 days registered5000 Experience Points
    jes'fuchinwitcha's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    501
    Join Date
    Mar 2023
    Posts
    2,143
    Points
    6,152
    Level
    18
    Thanks Given
    322
    Thanked 491x in 388 Posts
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    One, that's not exactly what some science claims. Two, even what science actually says is questionable.
    Of course science is questionable, that’s a fundamental part of scientific method.

    Religious belief in things is not to be questioned, however, because it all hinges on faith.

  10. #29
    Points: 35,910, Level: 46
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 1,040
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Hoosier8's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    8631
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    11,163
    Points
    35,910
    Level
    46
    Thanks Given
    1,066
    Thanked 8,622x in 5,441 Posts
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A fact during WWII experienced by soldiers in Japanese internment camps. The ones that survived it all either had belief in family or religion to help them survive.
    Arguably, the greatest indictment of leftism is its preference for the vagrant and the criminal over the law-abiding citizen and victim.

  11. #30
    Points: 12,006, Level: 26
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 644
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    LWW's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1341
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Location
    People's Midwest Republic of Ameristan
    Posts
    3,259
    Points
    12,006
    Level
    26
    Thanks Given
    1,189
    Thanked 1,331x in 904 Posts
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IQ is a measurement of one’s ability to learn through reasoning and problem solving.

    It is not a measurement of what someone did, or did not, learn by exercising those abilities.
    "Buy a man eat fish, the day, teach a man to a life time! "
    "As one computer said, if
    you're on the train and they say 'PORTAL BRIDGE' you know you better make other plans."
    - Joseph Robinette Biden -

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts