User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Why The Air Force Needs the Stealthy B-21 Bomber

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497547
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,557x in 94,977 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Why The Air Force Needs the Stealthy B-21 Bomber

    The B-21 can most likely evade the low-band radar (search) of the S-400 / S-500 5th and maybe 6th Gen air defense weapons, but should it not, it still can evade the high ban (track) part. Our great B-52s can't. They will have to stand-off and use cruise missiles.

    Why The Air Force Needs the Stealthy B-21 Bomber

    Does America Really Need the B-21 Raider? The Russian state-backed media has for several years been claiming its advanced air defenses can track and destroy stealth aircraft, due to advanced computer processing, digital networking, and high-fidelity, longer-range radar systems.


    Russian S-400 and S-500s

    The Russian S-400s and S-500s, for example, reportedly reach longer ranges and detect aircraft on a wider range of frequencies, however, the ability to establish a moving target “track” and succeed in actually “hitting” or destroying a stealth aircraft is quite different than merely detecting that something is “there.”


    Therefore, if advanced air defenses be able to see “stealth” aircraft such as bombers, does that make new platforms like the B-21 obsolete upon arrival?


    The clear answer to this is likely no, for several reasons.


    Aircraft like the B-21 are engineered to elude lower frequency surveillance radar which can determine if something is “there” or “in the area” as well as high-frequency engagement or targeting radar able to establish and maintain a target “track” on a stealth aircraft.


    Finally, even if some kind of “track” is established, successfully “engaging” or destroying a target is entirely different and much more difficult.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (05-15-2023)

  3. #2
    Points: 145,112, Level: 91
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 1,538
    Overall activity: 66.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    carolina73's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    44152
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    58,054
    Points
    145,112
    Level
    91
    Thanks Given
    56,527
    Thanked 44,157x in 28,539 Posts
    Mentioned
    155 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So if you shoot from outside of the S-500 range at hyper-sonic speeds of about 1500 miles per hour then that only gives about 6 minutes max to detect, deploy and destroy.
    What kind of time target are they looking for?
    Let's go Brandon !!!

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497547
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,557x in 94,977 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carolina73 View Post
    So if you shoot from outside of the S-500 range at hyper-sonic speeds of about 1500 miles per hour then that only gives about 6 minutes max to detect, deploy and destroy.
    What kind of time target are they looking for?
    That is why I majored in Poli Sci and then went to law school.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (05-15-2023)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts