I'm not sure what you mean by 'Soft Power". Peter. The UN, which was designed to end World Wars in a cooperative setting, has been coopted by Communists, Fascists. the WEF and others, with a steady erosion of human rights and freedoms. It is a forum for dictatorships which get a lot of power they don't deserve.
The idea of an "Anglosphere" has been around for a while as has The British Commonwealth- now the Commonwealth of Nations -and to become a member the applicants must follow the Democratic principals which has led to our successes. Free trade and human rights, as well as other advantages would, I believe, encourage other Nations to become involved while countries like China would be frozen out.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/blo.../explainingthe
https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...rmat=4&depth=1
I believe--quite emphatically--in carrying a big stick.
It seems that ever since the invention of the atomic bomb--and now, the nuclear bomb--many people are scared witless (yes, that rhymes with something else that seems appropriate here) about the threat of "hard" power.
But the Chinese are not.
And I thoroughly believe that the Chinese leadership should be met with exactly the same thing--and to the same degree, also--that they mete out.
Carl Young (05-27-2023)
pjohns (05-28-2023)
The CCP is public about what they want with regards to Taiwan.
Yes, soft power is their preferred option.
If that doesn't work they claim they will use force- hard power.
I agree the US should hold the line along the First Island Chain. The map should have Taiwan as part of that line. Use your imagination.
ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ