Secular Humanism's Slippery Slope Of Moral Relativism:

[JAG]

The women marrying themselves movement is growing. They even have a name for it: Sologamy.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/28/us/so...cec/index.html

JAG Writes:

The sexual revolution that started in the 60's has not yet
hit bottom-Sodom.

But it will.

Just give it time.

It'll get there.

Conservatives who warned about the slippery slope in the 60's
were mocked and vilified -- but they were proven correct about
the slippery slope -- once you eliminate the traditional definition
of marriage and redefine it, then you are on the slippery slope and
there are no longer any principled reasons against:

polyamory

polygamy

3 males and 1 female getting married (group marriage is coming for certain)
2 females and 2 males

bestiality (humans having sex with animals and humans marrying their dogs)

No?

Well google "Legality of bestiality in Europe" and read what you pull up.
For example, "Yes, In Finland you Can Have Sex With your Pet."

So?

So they have to start somewhere. And legalizing sex with your pet is Step #1
leading to the legalization of legally marrying your dog. And adding bestiality
to the list of protected sexual orientation identity groups ("born this way, we
didn't choose it")

And how long do you think it'll be before a significant size identity group demands
the right to go totally nude anywhere anytime they want to do that?
They've already taken step #1 -- merely google : "where can you go nude in America"

Once a nation arrives at the immoral place America now is, there are no taboos allowed anymore.

One by one, the taboos you once thought were
UNTHINKABLE will become celebrated as good
morality and moral progress.

JAG

[]

Thoughts?


``

[Chris]

The slippery slope in the 60's sexual revolution is atomization in personal autonomy. Man is by nature a social being.

[JAG]

The slippery slope in the 60's sexual revolution is atomization in personal autonomy. Man is by nature a social being.

I don't understand your point -- could you elaborate?

(I know the definition of the words but I don't understand what
you are trying to communicate.)

Best

JAG

[]

[Chris]

I don't understand your point -- could you elaborate?

(I know the definition of the words but I don't understand what
you are trying to communicate.)

Best

JAG

[]

The whole point of second- and third-wave feminism was against family, marriage, having and raising children, and the Pill allowed for that and the Internet of social media and online shopping furthered it along, to the point of atomization or extreme individualism where abortion is argued as a matter of personal autonomy. Along with this atomization, the individual becomes denatured.

But man does not exist as an individual, he is, by nature, a social and political creature. We are defined by our relationships in society and culture.

[JAG]

The whole point of second- and third-wave feminism was against family, marriage, having and raising children, and the Pill allowed for that and the Internet of social media and online shopping furthered it along, to the point of atomization or extreme individualism where abortion is argued as a matter of personal autonomy. Along with this atomization, the individual becomes denatured.

But man does not exist as an individual, he is, by nature, a social and political creature. We are defined by our relationships in society and culture.

* Amen to all that.
* Thanks for taking the time to explain - excellent explanation.

Best

JAG

[]

[XavierOnassis]

I think most people could have sex with a pet, assuming that it is physically possible.
Very few people do have sex with their pets.
You never hear about even some wild movie star cornholing his airedale. This is either because (a) he did not consider this or (2) he did, and found it disappointing, or (c) he does it all the time, but only when there are no witnesses present.

Is it moral? I suppose if the Airedale gave consent, that would be a factor.