Ukraine is being colonized by liberals

[Peter1469]

lol

My research indicates there is one major political figure in the United States that supports the Russian federation in this conflict. That is Donald Trump.
I don't know what Putin has on him but it must really be something. I think it is much more than a p tape.
Donald loves strength and Putin has been shown to be weak. There's some other reason Trump adheres to Putin.
Why do you adhere to Putin Boris? Are you an unregistered foreign agent or are you in Russia?

[slideman]

So Ukraine is winning; when is there going to be zero Russian troops inside Ukraine?

As soon as the US sends 250,000 troops with a companying air and armor.
Or maybe it won't even require that. Russia has lost approximately a quarter of its troops. They can't keep this up forever.

Russia has lost half its combat capability in Ukraine, says UK armed forces chief


https://www.ft.com/content/8cd1c388-...9-14b6ea21ede2

[Ethereal]

As soon as the US sends 250,000 troops with a companying air and armor.
Or maybe it won't even require that. Russia has lost approximately a quarter of its troops. They can't keep this up forever.

Russia has lost half its combat capability in Ukraine, says UK armed forces chief


https://www.ft.com/content/8cd1c388-...9-14b6ea21ede2

Let's send you first.

[Peter1469]

As soon as the US sends 250,000 troops with a companying air and armor.
Or maybe it won't even require that. Russia has lost approximately a quarter of its troops. They can't keep this up forever.

Russia has lost half its combat capability in Ukraine, says UK armed forces chief


https://www.ft.com/content/8cd1c388-...9-14b6ea21ede2

Oh.

[slideman]

Oh.

Straight Russian propaganda there is no danger of a nuclear exchange or very little because of mutual assured destruction which is prevented any such thing occurring for many long years.
Food and threats of nuclear attack on the US or empty and if we make clear to him that any first use will be construed as an attack on the United States there will be no first use.
Why do you support Putin's propaganda?

[Peter1469]

Straight Russian propaganda there is no danger of a nuclear exchange or very little because of mutual assured destruction which is prevented any such thing occurring for many long years.
Food and threats of nuclear attack on the US or empty and if we make clear to him that any first use will be construed as an attack on the United States there will be no first use.
Why do you support Putin's propaganda?

A sane person wouldn't write the risks of escalation off as Russian propaganda.

[stephenpe]

So Russia would use nuclear weapons on a border country? Right and Im gonna win the powerball twice. Russians KNOW about the effects of radiation from Chernobyl. Putin is a POS but he isnt ignorant of the Pandoras box that would open........

[Ethereal]

Straight Russian propaganda there is no danger of a nuclear exchange or very little because of mutual assured destruction which is prevented any such thing occurring for many long years.
Food and threats of nuclear attack on the US or empty and if we make clear to him that any first use will be construed as an attack on the United States there will be no first use.
Why do you support Putin's propaganda?

It hasn't happened yet, therefore there is no danger and no need to worry about it.

What impeccable logic.

[Ethereal]

So Russia would use nuclear weapons on a border country? Right and Im gonna win the powerball twice. Russians KNOW about the effects of radiation from Chernobyl. Putin is a POS but he isnt ignorant of the Pandoras box that would open........

I thought you guys said Putin was Hitler 2.0? That he's some kind of bloodthirsty maniac hellbent on conquering the world? Now you're talking about him like he's a sober and rational actor who carefully weighs his actions.

Which one is it? You can't have it both ways.