So what have we learned?
Minnie Mouse sucks at twerking and right wingers invented children's beauty pageants.
I don't have a party.
Listen to Zelmo on this one -- beauty pageants are sick and disgusting.
No one endorses or promotes sexualizing or sexually mutilating children. And, quit calling names. It just shows how insecure you are in your position.
And, what in the world did the OP Minnie Mouse have to do with your rant? That was stupid dancing but nothing sexual.
""A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul" ~George Bernard Shaw
Did you see Minnie Mouse doing sexually oriented moves directed at a child?
I didn't.
There is not a lot of difference between parading little girls (and older girls) around in skimpy costumes and teaching them questionable gestures/moves.
It just indicates that the fringe right really doesn't care about sexualizing children--as long as they're sexualized in their favorite way. That's acceptable.
It only makes sense that if someone is truly wanting to protect children--and, kudos to Zelmo for being the only one brave enough to say so--they will denounce those beauty pagents that are meat markets for girls of all ages.
But no, let that crap continue--and let's blow a fuse over Minnie Mouse dancing like an ij.
""A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul" ~George Bernard Shaw
Zelmo agreed with me. Those pageants are sexualizing children.
And, no, I don't have a party.
It would really be more consistent if those who have TIAs over Minnie Mouse would look a little deeper into child beauty pageants.
Not doing so is very hypocritical.
And, shows a strong political agenda.
""A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul" ~George Bernard Shaw
More dregs from Qanon. This obsession with children and using them as political pawns to attack democrats is sick and counter productive to actually protecting children. I see some people in this forum seem to find the subject titillating and are always on the lookout for an opportunity to insert child abuse into the conversation. What is the purpose here, to draw attention to a real problem or to promote a conspiracy theory? Let me guess...